Ambiguous Terms
Philosophical Analysis
1. Clarificatory Probe:
2.1 Are there vague or ambiguous terms that need to be defined and or clarified?
“Vague or Ambiguous Terms”
* In dealing with the situation given, I had come up that there are terms or words that are not clear or too obscure on me. And these are: * “Jenny became heavy with a child” * “Rheumatic Heart” * “Mitral Valve” * “Medical Predicament”
In regards with the ambiguous or vague terms that I’ve encountered in the given situation, I had able to scrutinized the 1st term or phrase wherein it tells and shows that “Jenny became heavy with a child” with these terms or phrase, I was able to know that Jenny is very much willing or she is very aggressive …show more content…
* The issues being presented above are both questions of fact and questions of values it’s because we cannot denied the fact that the issues questions that are being presented in the situation are present in every corner of the world, in a narrow sense it tells that there is somewhat similar situation that is happening to a person wherein maybe at some point in time one person is suffering the same situation, meanwhile these could be also a question of values because you can gain something from this situation in which you are to decide the attitude you are to take in situation and you could also learn from that situation.
2. State the alternatives in Clear and Simple terms: 3.4 Alternative X: Jenny should abort the fetus so that her life will be safe 3.5 Alternative Y: Jenny should continue the pregnancy even if she will lose her life
3. Analysis of the Elements of the Decision Environment: 4.6 Teleological Analysis 4.7.1 Which alternative, act/rule, has more beneficial consequences for greater number? (self, community or humanity …show more content…
4.7.4 Is the dilemma balanced? This means that both alternatives X and Y have more or less the same beneficial consequences as well as aversive consequences. * In regards with the equality of the 2 alternatives I think it is balanced wherein in alternative X tells that the baby should be aborted so that Jenny’s life will be safe, at some point there could be a possibility that the life of Jenny will lose too. In accordance with the second alternative, alternative Y, for me it tells that Jenny could continue her pregnancy but she will lose her life, meanwhile if we are to take some points and views there could be a possibility that the baby will be abnormal or will die too, so for me the situation are balanced in nature. 4.7 Deontological
1. Clarificatory Probe:
2.1 Are there vague or ambiguous terms that need to be defined and or clarified?
“Vague or Ambiguous Terms”
* In dealing with the situation given, I had come up that there are terms or words that are not clear or too obscure on me. And these are: * “Jenny became heavy with a child” * “Rheumatic Heart” * “Mitral Valve” * “Medical Predicament”
In regards with the ambiguous or vague terms that I’ve encountered in the given situation, I had able to scrutinized the 1st term or phrase wherein it tells and shows that “Jenny became heavy with a child” with these terms or phrase, I was able to know that Jenny is very much willing or she is very aggressive …show more content…
* The issues being presented above are both questions of fact and questions of values it’s because we cannot denied the fact that the issues questions that are being presented in the situation are present in every corner of the world, in a narrow sense it tells that there is somewhat similar situation that is happening to a person wherein maybe at some point in time one person is suffering the same situation, meanwhile these could be also a question of values because you can gain something from this situation in which you are to decide the attitude you are to take in situation and you could also learn from that situation.
2. State the alternatives in Clear and Simple terms: 3.4 Alternative X: Jenny should abort the fetus so that her life will be safe 3.5 Alternative Y: Jenny should continue the pregnancy even if she will lose her life
3. Analysis of the Elements of the Decision Environment: 4.6 Teleological Analysis 4.7.1 Which alternative, act/rule, has more beneficial consequences for greater number? (self, community or humanity …show more content…
4.7.4 Is the dilemma balanced? This means that both alternatives X and Y have more or less the same beneficial consequences as well as aversive consequences. * In regards with the equality of the 2 alternatives I think it is balanced wherein in alternative X tells that the baby should be aborted so that Jenny’s life will be safe, at some point there could be a possibility that the life of Jenny will lose too. In accordance with the second alternative, alternative Y, for me it tells that Jenny could continue her pregnancy but she will lose her life, meanwhile if we are to take some points and views there could be a possibility that the baby will be abnormal or will die too, so for me the situation are balanced in nature. 4.7 Deontological