Alternative Sentencing Juveniles
6.) Alternative sentencing (Instead of sending juveniles to industrial schools). Example, probation which would include the completion of a community service order, or drug program.
Many juvenile offenders can be effectively rehabilitated through community- based supervision and intervention. There is need for alternatives to detention; research on traditional confinement in large training schools or correctional facilities has found relatively high recidivism rates (Austin, Johnson and Weitzer, 2005). The time a youth spend in confinement not only takes the individual away the negative factors that may influence his behavior but also take them away from any other positive reinforcements such as family and the community.
Practitioners …show more content…
Feasible alternatives include home detention, day and evening reporting center, and community based treatment. Strategically matching youth with needed programming requires a cross-system commitment to the objective assessment, classification, and placement of youth. Placement in these alternative programs depends on the individual, and the offence committed and it is up to the court system to assess each youth to see if one of these alternatives may be optimal. If this cannot be done in the court stage the task could be carried out during the need assessments that are usually carried out when the offender enters custody.
Home detention- this alternative requires offenders to stay at home during specified periods and other conditions such as drug testing may apply. An evaluation of a program in Unites states (Alabama), found that home detainees were no more likely to recidivate than a group held in secure detention (Smykla and Selke, 1982). Home detention provides considerable cost saving compared with secure placements (Ball, Huff and Lilly, …show more content…
One goal is to promote parental supervision and authority. Available literature suggests that community based programs are one of the most effective treatments (Lipsey and Wilson, 1998). To facilitate this court system can work unison the National Task Force on Crime Prevention and the Juvenile liaison scheme to tap into their resources and expertise to assist these juvenile offenders to reintegrated back into the society, instead of confining them to prison walls.
Alternatives to detention and are intended to reduce crowding, cut the costs of operating juvenile detention centers, shield offenders from the stigma of institutionalization, help offenders avoid associating with youth who have more serious delinquent histories, and maintain positive ties between the juvenile and his or her family and
Many juvenile offenders can be effectively rehabilitated through community- based supervision and intervention. There is need for alternatives to detention; research on traditional confinement in large training schools or correctional facilities has found relatively high recidivism rates (Austin, Johnson and Weitzer, 2005). The time a youth spend in confinement not only takes the individual away the negative factors that may influence his behavior but also take them away from any other positive reinforcements such as family and the community.
Practitioners …show more content…
Feasible alternatives include home detention, day and evening reporting center, and community based treatment. Strategically matching youth with needed programming requires a cross-system commitment to the objective assessment, classification, and placement of youth. Placement in these alternative programs depends on the individual, and the offence committed and it is up to the court system to assess each youth to see if one of these alternatives may be optimal. If this cannot be done in the court stage the task could be carried out during the need assessments that are usually carried out when the offender enters custody.
Home detention- this alternative requires offenders to stay at home during specified periods and other conditions such as drug testing may apply. An evaluation of a program in Unites states (Alabama), found that home detainees were no more likely to recidivate than a group held in secure detention (Smykla and Selke, 1982). Home detention provides considerable cost saving compared with secure placements (Ball, Huff and Lilly, …show more content…
One goal is to promote parental supervision and authority. Available literature suggests that community based programs are one of the most effective treatments (Lipsey and Wilson, 1998). To facilitate this court system can work unison the National Task Force on Crime Prevention and the Juvenile liaison scheme to tap into their resources and expertise to assist these juvenile offenders to reintegrated back into the society, instead of confining them to prison walls.
Alternatives to detention and are intended to reduce crowding, cut the costs of operating juvenile detention centers, shield offenders from the stigma of institutionalization, help offenders avoid associating with youth who have more serious delinquent histories, and maintain positive ties between the juvenile and his or her family and