Preview

ALR383 Government Relations and Issue

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ALR383 Government Relations and Issue
ALR383 – Government Relations and Issues Management
Essay – Same-sex marriage
Sam Stacker
211307837

As society has revolutionized and with democratic ideology denominating has the western world, liberation and equality campaigns stemming from “third sector” (Keane 1998) lobbying groups, stand as a key component to the operation a “civil society”(Keane 1998). Carrying an objective to influence legislators or regulatory agencies, these political advocacy groups play a critical role in the operation of a healthy liberal democracy. In contemporary society, the notion of Same-sex marriage has polarized public opinion worldwide and is recognized as one of the most controversial non-economic issues to ever confront the Australian parliament. The contentious issue provides a modern 21st century example of “civil-governmental cooperation” (Keane 1998), comparable to 1960 libertarian movements against racism and sexism. Ones right to the institution of marriage is the key distinction between the treatment of heterosexual and same-sex relationships in Australia, and forms the foundations upon which the highly contentious issue is contested. ‘Australian Marriage Equality’ is an activism group partnered with a myriad of pro same-sex marriage organizations around Australia, who collectively fight to end the evident disparity in entitlements between heterosexual couples and same-sex partners. Founded in 2004, the lobbying group was established preceding the Federal Parliament’s amending of the ‘Marriage Act 1961’, which ultimately prohibited lawful recognition of same-sex partners. Opposing the concept of Same-sex marriage is the politically active ‘Australian Christian Lobby’. Publicly condemning the notion of same-sex marriage in the public sphere, the influential group raises moral and religious concerns and assertively promotes the damaging social consequences associated with the potential legalization of same-sex marriage. Both these well-established lobbying



References: Keane, J 1998. Civil society: old images, new visions. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Mackey, S 2012, 'Public Affairs and Civil Society ', The Influence Seekers, Australian Scholarly Publishing Australian Christian Lobby 2013, ‘The ACL Vision, Australian Christian Lobby’, retrieved 27 April 2014, <http://www.acl.org.au/about/> Australian Christian Lobby 2012, ‘Submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee Concerning the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill’ 2010, Australian Christian Lobby, retrieved 27th April 2014, < http://www.acl.org.au/> Dunkin, A 2012, ‘ACL ENTERS SA MARRIAGE DEBATE’, GAY NEWS NETWORK, 14 November, retrieved 27 April 2014, <http://gaynewsnetwork.com.au/news/acl-enters-sa-marriage-debate-9511.html> Wilson L, 2013,’High Court strikes down ACT gay marriage law’, The Australian, 12 December, retrieved 28 April 2014, <http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/high-court-strikes-down-act-gay-marriage-law/story-fn59niix-1226781474406> Australian Marriage Equality 2012,’Marriage equality and public opinion’, Australian Marriage Equality, retrieved 28 April 2014, http://www.australianmarriageequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Full-Galaxy-Poll-Results-2010.pdf> Habermas J, 1991,The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MIT Press, retrieved 29 April 2014, < http://books.google.com.au/books?id=e799caakIWoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false> Habermas J, 1984, The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press, retrieved 1 April 2014, < http://books.google.com.au/books/The_Theory_of_Communicative_Action_Reaso.html?id=kuFhjNZuHTAC&redir_esc=y> Bernays, E. 1928, Propaganda, New York: Liveright.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of whether or not gay marriage should be accepted in Australia has been largely debated in politics and among the general public for a while now, and it seems as though it will remain a continuous issue for some time to come. The majority of Australians are currently split over whether the traditional view of marriage being solely between a man and a woman should be preserved, or whether this view of marriage is out-dated and should be redefined in order to allow gays the right to marry. The Australian Labor Party was also divided on this issue at a recently held federal conference. In the opinion piece “Welcome, gays, to… what?” (published in the Herald Sun in December 2011), Wendy Tuohy contends in a supportive tone, that gay marriage should be allowed in Australia, and in a more inquisitive and somewhat deflated tone goes on to question the meaning and necessity of marriage in today’s world. Similarly, Michael Newton believes that our laws should reflect on the new sets of values which are present in the modern world. In his letter to the editor titled “It is nonsense to cling to the past” (published in The Age on the 16th of November 2011), he presents a reasoned point of view, that although marriage has had a certain meaning in the past, to assume that it should stay that way would be completely irrational. A contrasting viewpoint is presented in the opinion piece “Tsunami-sized backlash on same-sex marriage looms” (published in The Australian on the 12th of December 2011), in which Barry Cohen attacks “the pro-gay marriage brigade”, expressing his traditionalist views and stark rejection of same-sex marriage in a very deprecating and slightly satirical tone. A cartoonist named Spooner drew a cartoon (published in The Age on the 22nd of November 2011) which presents two clashing views of the issue. A non-Christian audience would derive a message in support of giving gays the right to marry, whilst a religious audience may see the opposite.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coun 501

    • 4924 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Jost, K. (2003, September 5). Gay marriage. CQ Researcher, 13, 721-748. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from CQ Researcher Online, http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher…

    • 4924 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first debate is a normative debate concerning “What relationships are intrinsically valuable. The second debate is an administrative debate concerning “What relationships between persons ought to be given legal recognition.” Koppelman’s second premise is that those opposed to gay-marriage cannot be sustained on moral ground claiming that “Homosexual relations are intrinsically wrong.” Koppelman’s third premise is that marriage law should be constructed to accommodate everyone, he claims that the state has enacted a “One size fits all default rules,” making it difficult for every different outcome to succeed. Koppelman’s forth premises is that the most successful heterosexual couples and their gay counterparts, claiming that homosexual’s love different from a heterosexual couple having their children inferior.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage Act 1961

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Marriage Act 1961, marriage in Australia is defined as, “the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.” It is said that a “good law” is that which consists of five key features; one being that the law reflects the changing values of society (Sykes, 2002). The aspect of marriage being allowed only between a man and a woman has been widely contested among people as society has evolved and this provokes debate.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wilson, L. 2013. High Court strikes down ACT gay marriage law | The Australian. [online] Available at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/high-court-strikes-down-act-gay-marriage-law/story-fn59niix-1226781474406 [Accessed: 8 Mar 2014].…

    • 1307 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article is covering the “Marriage and Religious Freedom Act” that was introduced in the House. The Act was drafted by Raul Labrador and endorsed by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; it is being described as the latest way to use religion as an excuse to discriminate, causing significant harm on “gay people and their families.” The bill would prevent the government from taking any “adverse actions” based on “acts in accordance” with a person or group’s religiously motivated opposition to same-sex marriage. The bill is very broad, and call lead to unfairness to same-sex couples, such as, businesses denying spouses their rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage and Conflict

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the outside looking in, it is rather apparent that there are two objectives in regards to gay marriage; those who say “green-light” and those who say “red-light”. In essence, when you consider the marriage battle between homosexuals and heterosexuals -- it’s like fire and ice; they both have the potential to overcome each other’s privileged power. “It’s this tug of war between whose gut feeling is better or morally correct that perpetuates the cycle of bitter feelings,” suggests David Myers , a spokesperson for gay rights (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 129). When we take into consideration the lenses model, you quickly notice that you have three parties – one that is for the institution of gay marriage, one that is against it, and one that is liaison between the both (the government). Those who say “green light” for gay marriage see themselves as being “ostracized by the other parties for wanting to belong” (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 13). Rather than being avoidant, this party finds it more promising to just promote “collaboration as they find an integrative solution that will satisfy both the other parties” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, p. 163). Meanwhile, those who say “red light” to gay marriage either see their counterparts (the “green lighters” and the government) as unmoral tradition breaking savages (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 113). They believe in that the perfect union in marriage as that of a heterosexual bases rather than a homosexual. The government on the other hand sees itself as the crowd pleaser. They are persuaded by the vote of the masses and see their part only as one who acts accordingly to the public interest.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law Reform

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To achieve just outcomes, justice needs to be done and seen to be done. To do this the law must adapt to accommodate society’s changing needs and attitudes. This means that, over time, new laws must be introduced and old ones repealed or amended. The decriminalizing of homosexuality is one area in which law reform has been driven by changes in society’s values and the consequent advancement of society in recognizing equality and justice for its members, through recognition of non-traditional family structures. The effectiveness of law reform in achieving just outcomes for family members and society can be evaluated by examining issues such as the treatment of same-sex couples in adoption, recognition of same-sex marriage and same-sex couples having equal rights under the law, for example under inheritance laws, health and other insurances, superannuation entitlements and other aspects of social contract.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the opinion piece published in the Sunday Herald Sun on April 20th, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Penberthy expressed his opinion about same-sex marriage in Australia. Penberthy has enthusiastically spoken about gay marriage in a positive way, he shows this point of view throughout the entire piece, but it is emphasised and summed up in the title ‘Same-sex marriages in Australia? She’ll be right, mate’.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Viewpoints

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wilkins, Richard G. "The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Heterosexual Marriage." Family in America June 2001: n. pag. Rpt. in Homosexuality. Ed. Helen Cothran. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2003. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 5 May…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Writing Project three

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Barkacs, Linda L. “Same Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, And Employee Benefits: Unequal Protection Under The Law – When Will Society Catch Up With The Business Community?” Journal Of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 11.2 (2008) 33-44.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As society evolves it grows in diversity and acceptance to which regard the legal system must change to better serve societies needs and values. With reference to this the legal system’s approaches to protect and recognise the rights of same sex couples in relation to same-sex marriage has proven to be ineffective. Whilst there has been reform through the Corbett v Corbett 1970 (One of the couple had undergone a sex change operation so the courts reformed the sex requirement from birth certificate to the…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Reform- My Report

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * the case-waiting for the big day-in six years, Michele and Lisa Saffery held onto their dream that one day they could legally marry in Australia. The women from Wagga Wagga and their two children, Gemme 6 and Jordae 5 carried a huge rainbow flag during 8000-strong gay marriage rights march the Labor party National conference in Sydney. Along with many others, the couple decided to have the same surname despite not being married, were disappointed with the conscience vote approved at the conference. ''I have to say to Julia Gillard, 'Damn you!''' Michele said. ''All Labor MPs should be voting 'yes' on this issue. The conscience vote is just a cop-out for Julia.'' An observant Jew, mr.whitmont-stein dismissed arguments that allowing same sex marriage was an attack on religion. “the whole point of marriage is equality, it’s not about religious institutions”, he said. Lisa Saffert and Michele are Australian but also hold British passports but they insist on marrying in Australia…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due to the long-awaited family law reforms signifying the recognition of same sex relationships, one may say, “society moves ahead and the law limps behind.” It was in the 1969 that the ACT Homosexual Law Reform Society was formed, indicating society’s demand for equality. Such demands were first recognised by the Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999 (NSW), which enabled access to the District Court for property divisions and financial maintenance orders, and granted inheritance rights to same-sex de-factos. Finally, after 2 decades of Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras marches, The Commonwealth government passed the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008. The legislation expanded the definition of de-facto relationships to include, “2 persons of the same sex.” This, amongst other amendments, ensured that same-sex couples are afforded the same rights and obligations as heterosexual couples, under around 50 Commonwealth statutes.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Policymaking and the Media

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Cryle, D. & J. Hillier (2005). Consent and consensus: politics, media and governance in twentieth century Australia. Perth, W.A.: API Network, Australia Research Institute.…

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays