Alhambra Palace
ABSTRACT THINKING An Introduction to Creative Thinking in Basic Design
OMAR M. AMEIREH Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan oma_amir2000@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract. This paper critically examines the nature of the dramatic increase in the number of students accepted in schools of architecture in Jordan, and the contradictory decrease in their artistic, creative, thought process, projects problem solving and other skills. The paper also reviews architectural curriculum and courses to identify weaknesses in handling the changes and ultimately within these constraints and in order to handle the students variable potentials, abilities and contradictions, certain exercises in the basic design course are devised in ways that; reduces its dependency on learnable manual skills and conceptual thinking; uses teaching techniques that correlates and incorporates Arts, Architecture and Sciences as complementary topics; approaches and reaches creativity as a procedure not a gift; transfers and travels easily between complexities and simplicities, between natural and artificial intelligence, between abstract and relative thinking; employ geometries and design tools as the main structure of any composition; makes self evaluations of choices, decisions and variables easier. Taking Abstraction as a framework in solving the problem of the exercises gave answers and solution to many problems that was not easy solving under the conventional ways of design.
1. Introduction Innovative thinking for scientists and researchers is considered a gained skill, while for many artists and architects creativity is a gift we are born with, which is hard to obtain. Some say it can be taught with application of simple techniques. In the field of education all is possible depending on the process of bringing out the gift in those who have it and giving it to those who don’t. Bringing out or giving creativity to students of art and
528
OMAR M. AMEIREH Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan oma_amir2000@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract. This paper critically examines the nature of the dramatic increase in the number of students accepted in schools of architecture in Jordan, and the contradictory decrease in their artistic, creative, thought process, projects problem solving and other skills. The paper also reviews architectural curriculum and courses to identify weaknesses in handling the changes and ultimately within these constraints and in order to handle the students variable potentials, abilities and contradictions, certain exercises in the basic design course are devised in ways that; reduces its dependency on learnable manual skills and conceptual thinking; uses teaching techniques that correlates and incorporates Arts, Architecture and Sciences as complementary topics; approaches and reaches creativity as a procedure not a gift; transfers and travels easily between complexities and simplicities, between natural and artificial intelligence, between abstract and relative thinking; employ geometries and design tools as the main structure of any composition; makes self evaluations of choices, decisions and variables easier. Taking Abstraction as a framework in solving the problem of the exercises gave answers and solution to many problems that was not easy solving under the conventional ways of design.
1. Introduction Innovative thinking for scientists and researchers is considered a gained skill, while for many artists and architects creativity is a gift we are born with, which is hard to obtain. Some say it can be taught with application of simple techniques. In the field of education all is possible depending on the process of bringing out the gift in those who have it and giving it to those who don’t. Bringing out or giving creativity to students of art and
528
References: ARMONI, M. AND GAL-EZER, J., 2006. Reduction-an Abstract Thinking Pattern: The Case of the Computational Models course. In: The Open University of Israel, Computer Science Department, Online Information. IS. CASTI, J., AND KARLQVIST, A. (editors). 2003. Art and Complexity. Elsevier Science B.V. CASTI, J. L. 2003. Complexity and Aesthetics: Is Good Art “Complex” Art. In Art and Complexity. Elsevier Science B.V. BARROW, J.D., 2003. Art and Science—Les Liaisons Dangereuses In Art and Complexity. Elsevier Science B.V. GELL-MANN, M. 2003. Regularities and Randomness: Evolving Schemata in Science and the Arts. In Art and Complexity. Elsevier Science B.V. HJORT, H., 2003. Drawing, Knowledge, and Intuitive Thinking: Drawing as a Way to Understand and Solve Complex Problems. In Art and Complexity. Elsevier Science B.V. TAYLOR, R., 2003. Fractal Expressionism – Where Art Meets Science. In Art and Complexity. Elsevier Science B.V. GOODROW, A., 2006. Modes of Teaching and Ways of Thinking. TERC, Tufts University, Online Information, USA. ALPS,. 1999. The Thinking Classroom: Al Andrade, Harvard Project Zero, Ways of Teaching Thinking. Online Information, http://learnweb.harvard.edu/ALPS/tjinking/ways. PERKINS, D.N., 1995. Outsmarting IQ: The Emerging Science of Learnable Intelligence. The Free Press. New York. 233-227 TISHMAN, S. and ANDRADE, A., 1995. Thinking Disposition: A Review of Current Theories, Practices, and Issues. In Action Rport#1.Washintong, DC. HARRIS, R., 1998. Introduction to Creative Thinking. In Creative Problem Solving: Creative Thinking. Online information, http//www.virtualsalt.com/crebook1. HARRIS, R., 2002. Creative Thinking Techniques. In Creative Problem Solving: Creative Thinking. Online information, http//www.virtualsalt.com/crebook1. BODEN, M.A. 1991. Creativity and Unpredictability In The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Expanded ed. London: Abacus. DOCZI, G., 1981. The Power of Limits: Proportional Harmonies in Nature, In Art and Architecture. CC. Shambhala. FULLER, R. B., 1965. Conceptuality of Fundamental Structures. In Structure in Art and in Science. Gyorgy Kepes, Editor. New York: Braziller. MENDELBROT, P., 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman. PEARCE, P., 1978. Structure in Nature is a Strategy for Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. WILSON, E. O., 1998. Consilience, N. Y., Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Creativity, Online Encyclopedia, visited 11-06-2007. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_creative_thought_processes Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Creativity, Online Encyclopedia, visited 11-06-2007. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction 3rd Int’l ASCAAD Conference on Em‘body’ing Virtual Architecture [ASCAAD-07, Alexandria, Egypt]