Preview

Alfieri’s True Power Comes from His Role as Prophet and Narrator, Not from His Profession as a Lawyer. Discuss

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alfieri’s True Power Comes from His Role as Prophet and Narrator, Not from His Profession as a Lawyer. Discuss
Arthur Miller uses the role of Alfieri in his play ‘A View from the Bridge’, as a character who represents the law, but more importantly as a prophet and narrator. Alfieri’s role as a lawyer connects to the events leading to the destruction of Eddie Carbone, We also trust a lawyer to be a good judge of character and rational, because he is professionally detached. Although his profession is an important addition to his character, his role as prophet and narrator trumps his profession. Miller uses Alfieri as a chorus, much similar to those of a greek tragedy, and Alfieri links the inevitable tragedy to those of the Greek tragedy’s. Alfieri does a lot of talking about the contrasting Italian and American ideas of justice.
Through Alfieri narration at the start of the play he introduces himself as a lawyer. As the audience are now aware of Alfieri role as a lawyer we are able to trust his judgment on the characters because as a result of his profession he is taught to be emotionally detached from his client. However his connection with Eddie makes it more harder because he as a more closer relationship with Eddie because of Eddie's father, 'I had represented his father in an accident case some years before, and I was acquainted with the family in a casual way'. As well as in the next appearance Alfieri tells us how he is so troubled, that he seek advice from a 'wise old woman', who tells him to pray for Eddie. Furthermore, he also tells the audience how the Italian community react to his presence because he is a representative of the law, 'to meet a lawyer or a priest on the street is unlucky'. From this quote we could interpret that, as most of the audience are already aware, that a visit to a lawyer means you're in great trouble. It becomes obvious that many of the Italians try their best to not involve themselves with representatives of the law because they are illegal immigrants.
Miller’s play depicts the ideas of a classical Greek tragedy. In the ancient

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller is an American playwright who started writing “the hook” which is about union corruptions on the Brooklyn waterfront. Then he started writing The Crucible which is about a troubled young girl named Abigail Williams, who had an affair with John Proctor in his 30s, and the witch trials. He also wrote The Crucible during the communism time and during the “Hitler speech, hoping to give them a sense of the Nazi which my play took place.” The article allegory was about how Arthur Miller against McCarthyism, and how John Proctor and Arthur Miller are alike.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will be studying the fight scene where Mercutio and Tybalt die, and comparing, the two film versions of the play, I will find differences and similarities as well as describing how each director / producer interprets and makes their version of the film. I will describe how eight different factors are present in each version of the film: Genre/Film, Institution, Audience, Representation, Mediation, Film Language and Ideology.…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first aspect of Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero, nobility, is one where the hero is in a high social or political standing. John Proctor, however, is a farmer living outside of town with very little contact with those living in Salem Village. While the aspects of Proctor’s life negate Artistotle’s for requirement to be a “tragic hero”, Miller himself wrote an article entitles “Tragedy and the…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Catherine decides to marry Rodolpho, Eddie becomes desperate and begs his lawyer, Alfieri (who is also the narrator), to help him. However, he is told that the only way the law is able to help him is if he informs the Immigration Bureau of the presence of the two illegal immigrants. Due to his earlier assertion that "it's an honor" to give the men refuge, he refuses to betray them. At home he continues to passively insult Rodolpho, and ends up getting Rodolpho to fight in a boxing match. In retaliation, Marco challenges Eddie to lift a chair from the bottom of its leg, when Eddie fails to do this, Marco picks up the chair with one hand from the bottom of its leg and lifts it above his head. This demonstates Marco's superior strength, mentally and physically to Eddie.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alfieri is the first character we are introduced to in this play. Alfieri’s speech at the very beginning of the play sets the scene and actually foreshadows what happens in the play. ‘There were many here who were justly shot by unjust men.’ This quote is an example of how foreshadowing occurs in his speech. This foreshadows that someone is going to be killed and we can tell this even though we don’t know it yet. The effect of this foreshadowing is the creation of tension and as we see the play unfold, we begin to realise what Alfieri said in his opening speech is actually true.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Shakespeare’s drama, bias and self-interest, more than anything else, are the key elements of the conflicting perspectives fabricated in the play. Shakepeare unites the epic legedary stories of nationalism in the history of Julius Caesar to the lyrical stage craft of the theatre. The drama provides a visual realism of the fortitude of men; it highlights the self-acting individual and their ability to supersede values of patriotism and nationalism when self-interest becomes apparent. A key example of this is the character Brutus. The characterisation of Brutus changes throughout the play. So the audience is left with the conflicting perspective of who Brutus is; they are only left with the representation of who he is, only to work out for themselves who the true Brutus is. At the beginning of the play, the audience is shown a character who is noble, good, patriotic, honourable but most of all, proud of Rome. He is also depicted to be loyal. “Brutus has rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” This quote from Act 1 scence 2, shows the inital view of Brutus at the start of the play; it portrays him as noble and loyal to Rome. This becomes a motif throughout the play…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotole. (or Miller, Arthur.) “Poetics: Comedy and Epic and Tragedy”. The Bedford Introduction to Drama. 5th ed.. Ed Lee A. Jacobus. Bedford/St. Martins. New York. 65-71…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Crucible Film

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although Arthur Miller’s play is thematically rich, the movie form would not have been as interesting if not for the actors and actresses who accurately represented the characters as members of the community who were widely affected by guilt,…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's characterization of Brutus has often puzzled readers and critics of Julius Caesar, but rarely has anyone challenged Brutus' role as the hero of the play. Critics have labored, rather, in trying to understand Shakespeare's treatment of Caesar and in attempting to justify the title of the play without falling into the problematic assertion that Caesar and not Brutus is the real protagonist. A recent critic, however, reviewing some modern productions of the play, applauds the effort of one company to focus the play on Caesar rather than Brutus. Describing the Glen Byam Shaw production of Julius Caesar, in volume 11 of Shakespeare Survey,1 Roy Walker suggests that a successful interpretation of the…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In life, emotions can act as motivators for courses of action, particularly the feelings of fear, guilt and revenge. Arthur Miller's play The Crucible shows these themes put to use on a number of occasions. The play's numerous characters and relationships provide a plethora of examples where the themes are employed. It is through their actions that their emotions and motives are revealed, aiding us in understanding the measures they've taken.…

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interpretations are merely influenced by one’s personal beliefs, experiences and the way the situation is presented. William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar”, and David Deane’s news article, “Cop’s Visa Denied over Autistic Daughter”, present these interpretations by cleverly embedding the thoughts of different parties, and where these thoughts are stemmed from. Shakespeare’s conversion of Plutarch’s histories into a play exposes the responder to a visual interpretation of Julius Caesar’s event, and Deane’s article allows the text to be presented in a more authorative and formal approach to the readers. The expression of emotions and stage directions depicted within the play provides more depth to revealing the true intentions and nature of a character, whereas the news article simply persuades the audience through the structural official form of the text, presenting the information as objective and factual, rather than personal opinions.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play, Marco is very important. After all, he was the one person who killed Eddie Carbone which is the main event in the play. When Marco comes into the play for the first time, he is proven to be the most mature brother who has a quality life worth living. "What can I do? The older one is sick in chest. My wife - she feeds them from her own mouth. I tell you the truth; if I stay there they will never grow up. They eat the sunshine." Having children, Marco might feel they are a motivation to earn money to keep them alive as well as himself. The reason Marco came to Brooklyn, America to help and pay for food for his family as he would send money back to his wife in Italy to care for them. "My wife - I want to send right away maybe twenty dollars … because I could send them a little more if I stay." Marco knows he has an obligation to Eddie and is trying to be good so he can stay in America in the house to earn money for his family. So to make sure he can stay, he is trying not to let Rodolph ruin his chances either by doing ridiculous tasks like singing which Marco thinks is inappropriate at the time so tells him, "No - no! … You'll be quiet … You'll be quiet. He also thinks Rodolph should tame himself down. ‘’They paid for your courage. The English like courage. But once is enough.’’ He is loyal and strong. He thinks before he acts which gives the impression that he is focused. He only punished Eddie by killing him as he felt threatened which is not a selfish action. He is the antagonist in the play and the Sicilian avenging angel that Alfieri hints at his comment to the audience. "A man works, raises his family, goes bowling, eats, gets old and then dies. Now, as the weeks passed there was a future, there was a trouble that would not go away." Marco is also very important to the play as he is very respectful towards Eddie to begin with. Marco is willing to do any work to support his family as he is very proud of his wife and he is grateful…

    • 596 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ’There are various degrees of recognition in tragedy. In Othello, recognition is minimal: the protagonist learns what he has done and what he has lost, but learns little or nothing about himself.’’ How far do you agree? – This is a quote that I have adapted into my thesis, taken from ‘’A Book of literary terms’’.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eugene O’Neill is the father of modern American drama. His vision of life was essentially tragic; the human dilemma is the theme of his plays, which are all, with one exception, tragedies. He is a great tragic artist, but with a difference. He writes tragedies of modern life which do not follow the traditional Aristotelian form. There are no tragic heroes, exceptional individuals with Hamartia, in the Aristotelian sense. His tragic characters are all drawn from the humblest ranks of society. Each of them has his own pipe-dream, his own romantic illusion which sends him to doom. The tragedies demonstrate that any kind of escape from the reality of life is self-destroying; they assert at every step, the beauty and joy of life which must be accepted with all its joys as well as with all its limitations. Tragedy results when in the pursuit of some cherished illusion man forgets the reality of life. His tragedies soothe, console and strengthen which make O’Neill a great tragic artist. They’re as much apotheosis of the human spirit, as say, the tragedies of Shakespeare or of the ancient Greeks.…

    • 3233 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On of the first things that the author of the article points out, is that the author himself has contradictory statements on the roles of the society and the individual. Miller says that his central impulse in writing the play was the interior psychological question of guilt. In an interview with Miller, he says that he wrote the play to emphasize the conflict between people and not the conflict within somebody (Bonnet). I agree with the author’s opinion that the even Miller is ambiguous about what the focus of the play is, perhaps because he himself doesn’t really know, or perhaps because he wants the reader to discover that for his or herself. Miller, in his authorial statements even lays stress on the importance of the sense of community (Bonnet), all while giving important personal characters lives.…

    • 717 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays