Preview

Alexander The Great Tactics

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
98 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great Tactics
The Indian campaign of Alexander the Great began in 326 BC. After conquering the Achaemenid Empire of Persia, Alexander launched a campaign into India. To deal with the ever-changing military, cultural, and economic landscape, he planned meticulously, he analyzed every piece of information and formulated as many alternatives as possible, to help the world. He built an empire that was no more than 40,000 men. Toward that end, he used tactics, mobility, and weaponry—including the formidable Macedonian phalanx—to overcome his opponents. he was able to recruit indigenous professionals into his governmental structure and leverage their skill and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Following the Battle of Gaugamela, Alexander planned on deploying the same tactics used against the Persians during the battle in Issus. In reply, his generals disagreed with repeating that tactic as it would put Alexander in danger, it would leave the left and center unit weaken against Persian, and purpose that Alexander take the fight towards Darius together with his army. Alexander opposed to his general’s idea as he was very firmed on his own belief and reassured his generals that if he is able to immediately take out Darius again like at Issus (Yenne 73). The battle would be over as his non-Persian soldiers would have no motives to fight any more if their ruler had abandoned them. Hence, Alexander and his army marched out onto Gaugamela…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander began his invasion of Persia in 334 BC and he had to leave a large amount of troops in Greece to maintain control over his city states, this caused Alexander to only have 35,000 fighters with him when he began to pillage and take over Persian land. Alexander was greatly outnumbered compared to his Persian foes, never the less, he was able to cut through them. He never lost a battle. Things that may have contributed to his success was Alexander was a strong leader. He was present for every battle and rode with the cavalry on the front lines, with his trusted horse,…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Alexander the Great,was a villain when his dad was alive,but when his dad died he became a hero.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was a great leader even though some people commonly think that he was a sword wielding tyrant. Alexander was a great leader because he respected the beliefs of other people, had a great respect for knowledge, and he was a superior strategist in battle. He was so great that he was almost able to conquer the whole known world.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Alexander The Great Hero or Villain” By: Shelby Hammond-Helms I think that Alexander the Great is a hero because he had a lot of accomplishments and legacies that are important. Alexander the Great did do some bad things but most heroes do. I think that his accomplishments over ride his actions that were hurtful to other people. I think that his most important accomplishment is the Hellenistic culture. Alexander the Great founded the city Alexandria.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Legacy

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Alexander the Great was able to conquer half of the known world at that time, thus exponentially expanding his once small kingdom of Mesopotamia into a mighty empire. Even though Alexander was thought to be a man who could conquer any civilization, India’s military was actually much larger and stronger than the Greeks so the country was left untouched (“Introduction”). Due to this failure to invade India, the country was never impacted by the Greek culture, despite…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander, the young king of Macedonia, was the greatest military commander ever to lead an army into battle and is deserving of the title, Alexander the Great. Here are a few reasons why.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Flaws

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As Donald Trump is soon to be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, it is vital that he recognizes and attributes what past leaders of different nations have done to be successful. Leading a country is not an easy task, and history has proven to show what mistakes can end up crumbling a nation to its fall. One wrong move could lead to measures that could become detrimental to our country. If a nation does indeed fall, it usually ends up on the shoulders of the person who is leading it. Three leaders that helped make their empires great, or created controversy and division, included Darius I of Persia, Alexander the Great of Greece, and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. These three individuals helped drastically develop their nations…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When observing the qualities of a person, usually what are taken in account are that person’s actions. Alexander the Great, possibly one of the greatest war generals/kings of all time, was a gifted young man for his tactical strategies for battle. Through his victories and successes, he conquered a majority of the world. Plutarch writes a biography on Alexander, in which he includes his own views, which may or may not agree with other historians (though Plutarch’s accuracy may not be considered 100% seeing as he was alive a very long time after the king of Macedonia was dead), about Alexander: he was strong, confident, and audacious.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is often thought of as the greatest military commander that the world has ever seen. He was born in July of 356 B.C to King Philip II of Macedonia and Olympias. Since his youth, Alexander was tutored and trained by great philosophers such as Aristotle and Leonidas. His legacy of greatness started with the taming of the wild horse, Bucephalus. Alexander of Macedonia is worthy of the title, Great, due to his strategic military operations, his expansion of the Greek Empire, and the cultural diffusion of the Greeks across the world.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays