Preview

Alexander The Great

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great
Alexander III of Macedon also known as, Alexander the Great, made a name for himself many years ago, but today his “greatness” is being questioned because of research conducted due to modern technology. To be viewed as great, one would need lots of evidence supporting they are a well-rounded person. I believe that Alexander had rightfully earned this title because through my research I have only found evidence that Alexander was a man of greatness. Although Alexander displayed many characteristics of greatness there are three that have stood out me, his strategy, selflessness, and influence. These reasons show clear support that Alexander was Great and never anything less.
The first reason why I believe Alexander is great is because of his
…show more content…
Document B highlights a battle in which Alexander is fighting against another civilization. In Document B it states “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled... Alexander then threw his cavalry in a circle around the entire force, and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx.” When Alexander decided to change the way he positioned his troops to confuse the Porus it shows that he used strategy to change the playing field to help him. Alexander knew that by doing this his rivals would be expecting one thing and would be receiving another. By using a unique method Alexander can secure a win for himself in a smart and efficient way, highlighting a trait that shows one's greatness. The evidence found in Document A and B show that Alexander shows the strong understanding of strategy, therefore, showing he has a trait of greatness.
Another trait displayed by Alexander showing his greatness is his extreme selflessness. A leader who is selfless will put others before
…show more content…
In Document E, there is a chart which consists of data and one of the strongest pieces that defends his ability to influence is “Number of years Greek remained the official language of Jordan - 1,000” When Alexander came into Asia Minor he set out with the plan to free his people and spread his culture, but the length that his effects stayed in Asia Minor were simply due to the amount of influence placed on the people. The fact that Alexander can change the people of Jordan’s language to Greek shows that the people believed and agreed with him. Teaching a country a new language is difficult, but pulling through and having the people master and use the language is a task that can only do by a select group of people. This example from Document E shows Alexander's s ability to not only influence large groups of people, but to also make sure that his ways will stay with them for many years to go. Document F also focuses on Alexander's cultural effect to a different civilization, located by the Hindu Kush. The text talks about how people viewed Alexander as brave and kind and that when he decided to leave India some of his men decided to stay and create a new life in India. “Some of our [Kalish] words are the same as theirs, out music and out dancing too; we worship the same gods. This is why we believe the Greeks are our first ancestors.” Alexander and his people may

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Traditionally it is assumed that he was a reactionary, unlike the reformer his father, Alexander II, had been. However, as so often the case, this interpretation of Alexander III’s rule is undisputed. There is much reason to believe that despite some different policies, ultimately both men wanted to reach the same goals. Alexander III unquestionably did undermine the reforming policies of his father, but the underlying reasons for this are not so obvious.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alison Fong Ms. Wetzel English II Honors, Period 3 20 October 2014 Alexander the Great: The Military Genius Imagine crossing thousands of miles of scorching desert, rugged mountains and endless plains on both foot and horseback while commanding and maneuvering an army. Throughout history, there have been legends of heroes facing impossible trials. Alexander the Great is a legendary figure that did the impossible. Leading thousands of men across a continent is challenging enough on its own, but Alexander the Great took this challenge even further. He took the most demanding and laborious paths possible during his campaign to expand his empire, and he succeeded (Romey).…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander shows more signs of maturity as he travels through Asia into India, where he battles Porus with his fleet of Indian elephants, which Alexander’s horses were not used to. Although the battle between Alexander and Porus was long and hard fought, Alexander comes out victorious. But before that Alexander rides up to the dying Porus and asks what the defeated king wants. He answers that he wants to be treated as a king and Alexander proceeds to give Porus’ kingdom back. Although Alexander showed some sense of mercy all throughout his life, this part…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anita I agree with you. Alexander the Great was able to manage his resources and maneuver his troops into positions that made his forces more effective. Alexander’s ability to use his limited resources effectively made his assault on the larger military more efficient. Alexander was able to accomplish more with less because of his effective use of resources which made his army more efficient overall.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When observing the qualities of a person, usually what are taken in account are that person’s actions. Alexander the Great, possibly one of the greatest war generals/kings of all time, was a gifted young man for his tactical strategies for battle. Through his victories and successes, he conquered a majority of the world. Plutarch writes a biography on Alexander, in which he includes his own views, which may or may not agree with other historians (though Plutarch’s accuracy may not be considered 100% seeing as he was alive a very long time after the king of Macedonia was dead), about Alexander: he was strong, confident, and audacious.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was a lord of Macedonia in Ancient Greece. He was conceived in Macedonia in 356 BC. He was guided by Aristotle and turned into the ruler of Macedonia at 20 years old. He was known for building a major realm crosswise over numerous Greek settlements. Along these lines, Greek culture was spread out along numerous urban communities all through the Near East. The Greek culture spreading along the Near East was something worth being thankful for Greece since it enabled them to impact culture and dialect into different urban communities. It wasn't such something worth being thankful for the general population that lived in the Near East urban communities and past in light of the fact that they didn't get the chance to build up…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great was a hero because he did great things for many people. Alexander the Great built new cities where others had been destroyed (You Decide, pg 181). This statement shows how he tried to do good for society. Alexander wanted people to have homes and live a happy and healthy life. People liked Alexander and what he did. Making sure the lives of people were satisfied was a feeling that he felt was right. This shows how he did great things for many people. Another example of this is with his great leadership skills, he and his army won the war against the Persian Empire (Teacher Created Materials, pg 133). Because he was a good leader he defeated the Persian Empire and this helped the Macedonians. He defeated them and now the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander III

    • 2638 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Alexander III did not posses the qualities necessary for a successful ruler of late 19th-century Russia” – to what extent to you agree with this judgement?…

    • 2638 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 1216 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great was a conqueror and King of Macedonia prior to the Hellenistic Period. He succeeded to the throne after Phillip II of Macedon’s death brought his reign to an end. However, the continuance of the promised legacy his father left behind did not satisfy this power crazed King for fame and glory. Alexander the Great’s resentment towards his father led him to continue conquering because he wanted to overshadow his father. Under his headship, his unification of Greek city-states led to one of the largest empires known today.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander had military training and tactics from his father and learnings of philosophy from Aristotle. These set the base for him, and led to his ability to adjust his army to conditions. Alexander displayed awareness of logistics in his army. He considered every aspect, for example the routes taken and allies courted.2…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Ii and Reform

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander II executed many reforms during his time in power but did he reform for the sake of reforming? In the essay I will conclude whether or not Alexander had objectives in which reforming only partook as a secondary effect, and if so, what “was” he primarily?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander the Great, Alexander III of Macedon, King of Macedonia, was born in July 356 BC in Pella, Macedonia. He was one of the greatest military geniuses in history. His father, Philip II of Macedon, was a brilliant ruler and strategist. His mother was Olympias, princess of Epirus, daughter of King Neoptolemus. Arixstandros Telmisy, a renowned dream interpreter, determined that Olympias was pregnant, and that the child would have the character of a lion.…

    • 2605 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander has traits to be an effective leader in wars. He born as a leader and knows how to get the soldiers to follow him and trust him. He takes an interpersonal role where he acts as a leader of his men and the population of the land that he conquers. Alexander is a good planner and organiser, he know his goal and have a strategy. He has also great ambition to do the best for himself and his people. Alexander wants to be seen as a hero, he love to manage and conquer. He is a good negotiator, as you can see in the movie for example when he and his father conquer Greece. The traits and behaviour that Alexander has is associated with derailment is that sometimes he shows very high self-esteem and He thinks that he can manage everything because of his very individualistic nature. Also he trust anyone and anything but himself. However, he needs to learn that sometimes he also needs to listen to his people and his followers to make decisions. Furthermore, another negative trait of Alexander is that he is very much impatient since he is so much fascinated by his ambitions that he couldn’t analyze the facts.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays