Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Aldo Leopold

Good Essays
1075 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aldo Leopold
"We can be ethical only in relation to something we can see, feel, understand, or otherwise have faith in" (Erdmann Paragraph 5), one of the most renowned fathers of wildlife ecology, Aldo Leopold, so famously declared in his important non-fiction book, A Sand County Almanac. From his extensive studies of the environment, Leopold created the idea of the “land ethic”, which called for citizens of the global community to include the “land” with its soil, plants, animals and waters as part of the ecological community worthy of the respect and moral consideration of humans. Leopold stressed the importance of breaking the previously impenetrable barrier between man and nature by including the land as part of the community, and by developing an ethical relation and spiritual connection to the land because the land is as much part of the cycle of life and a part of the community as humans are. Leopold’s ecological interpretation of the relationship between humans and nature have caused him to convince many have the immense value and beauty of nature, and the importance of the preservation of wilderness.

One of Leopold’s most important contributions to the conservation movement was the development of the concept of the “land ethic” which must first be defined in order to understand Leopold’s basic argument in favor of protecting the wilderness and nature. One of the first premises of this concept is the presumption that humans are co-members of the global community instead of conquerors of the different members of the community. According to Leopold, “The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals…” (Leopold 129) and thus, as

co-members of this community, we should respect all other constituents of the community as we would respect other members of the human race. Thus, to Leopold, fostering this “land ethic” means changing our “loyalties, affections, and convictions” (Leopold 129) to include the land and build a spiritual connection with a land. This basic respect for fellow members of the community is the essence of the “land ethic” whose basic principle can be summarized in a single statement: “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong if it tends otherwise.” (Leopold 133) This principle suggests that humans are deeply embedded in human and ecological communities, and should reevaluate our loyalties and morals to include the land and the rest of the non-human community.

Leopold’s main argument was that humans should extend their ethical spheres to include the “land”, and made forest and wilderness preservation necessary for any adequate environmental ethic or policy. Leopold made the “land” not only of instrumental or utilitarian value to humans, but valuable in its own right. Humans were thus “ecological beings” who were not conquerors of the community, but co-members of the community along with the land, and thus were obligated to respect other non-human members of the community as well. However, the fostering of a love for the land requires much energy and effort on the part of humans. Leopold stated that it was “inconceivable” to him that an “ethical relation to land could exist without love, respect, and admiration for land” (Leopold 132). The development of this “ecological conscience” was important because the land, valuable in its own right, was deserving of moral consideration on the

part of humans, and was deserving of the utmost respect from them. The preservation of the “integrity, diversity, and beauty” (Leopold 131) of ecological communities should even, at times, trump human freedoms and human values of self-interest. To Leopold, the barrier between nature and man was then broken and all members, human and non-human, within the biotic community was just a incessant flow of energy which needed to be sustained in order to make life on Earth as habitable as possible, and thus, all members of the biotic community were deserving of equal respect and consideration from humans, who had the mental capacities to make distinctions between different members from the community.

The idea of the “land ethic” has thus changed the human concept of what deserves moral consideration. Humans, capable of reasoning and rationalizing, are endowed with the mental functions capable of distinguishing between what is right and wrong, and what is deserving of their time and energy, and Leopold made the preservation of the “land” part of what deserved the time and energy of humans. The land, the waters, and the soil are as much a part of this Earth as are humans, and should be treated with the same respect humans treat other humans. Leopold transcended the traditional view of ethics, which placed humans as conquerors of the community, by making them co-members of the community, and made the other members of the ecological community morally relevant. The role of emotion and sympathy would thus be changed, extending to these non-human members of the community, not only to our fellow human beings. Leopold stated, “That land is a community is the basic concept of ecology, but the land is to be loved and respected is an extension of ethics.” The perpetuation of the health of the land depends on how much we can view the land as being deserving of our consideration and respect, and how much time we are willing to allot to the care of the land so it can flourish.

Aldo Leopold has made wilderness preservation at the core of any environmental or ecologically related issue. The conservation of the environment on the part of humans was a necessity, because humans and the land shared a special connection with one another in that they were both members of the community of equal status. Leopold immediately rejected any concept that did not put ecological awareness at the forefront due to his concept of the “land ethic.” Leopold also suggested that one does not need to be formally trained in ecology in order to fully appreciate the value that wilderness and forests everywhere harbor, which further emphasizes the point that every human being really needs to try to respect the environment in order to really see the beauty of it.

Works Cited

Leopold, Aldo: A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There, 1948, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987, pp. 129-133.

Erdmann, J. (1997, December 4). Who was aldo leopold?. http://www.naturenet.com/alnc/aldo.html

Cited: Leopold, Aldo: A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There, 1948, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987, pp. 129-133. Erdmann, J. (1997, December 4). Who was aldo leopold?. http://www.naturenet.com/alnc/aldo.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his critique, “The Trouble with Wilderness or Getting Back to the Wrong Nature,” William Cronon argues against the romantic conceptualization of nature that a great portion of the environmentalist movement has embraced. Subsequently, Cronon revokes the Romantic and even quasi-religious notion that wilderness spaces are separate from those inhabited by man. He argues that by eliminating the divide in perception between the human constructs of the natural world and the civilized world, man will be encouraged to take more responsibility for his actions that negatively impact the environment. In prefacing his conclusion, he writes, “Home, after all, is the place where finally we make our living. It is the place for which we take responsibility,…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold, in his essay collection A Sand County Almanac explores the natural world, and the symbiotic relationship that’s shared between plant and animal, while also insinuating how humans live in opposition to that fragile synchrony, for we live to reshape our environment for contemporary gains. Leopold is able to write the essay as an ecological historian, who’s knowledge comes from the topography of the Wisconsin landscape, the rings of an Oak tree, or a single atom entombed in a limestone ledge. The first two sections of the book gravitate around two opposing forces conservation and modern progress (scientific advancement, economical growth.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never has a man left the embrace of nature once he found himself enamored by it; this infatuation is found in both John Muir’s and Aldo Leopold’s writing, a sense of wanting to protect this deity they call Mother Nature, a moral and ethical responsibility which every human being has to this Mother. Both John Muir and Aldo Leopold recount their almost romantic encounter with Mother Nature in their books Our National Parks and A Sand County Almanac, respectively. However, in both books it is notable that each man carries instilled in the very fiber of their being a sense of dissatisfaction toward the process of mechanization and industrialization; processes which unfortunately…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "That land is a community is the basic concept of ecology, but that land is to be loved and respected is an extension of ethics. That land yields a cultural harvest is a fact long known, but lately forgotten."…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The land ethic In Leopold’s view, humans see themselves as conquerors of the environment, and this is the key fault we all begin with in achieving this symbiosis with nature. This can be referred to as the conqueror role- we think we know what makes a community “tick.” We think we can manage it, and be “kings” of the land. But we don’t know as much as we think we do. He persists there is an instrumental value to nature, and this is one of the reasons we have no choice but to preserve it, we cannot survive as a species without its resources.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For their time, Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold held to beliefs that would influence conservationist ideals for many years to come. These pioneers of the concept of "harmony between men and land" (Leopold, 1949, p. 217) constructed a new wave of thinking towards conservation. Their work provided the foundations of contemporary thinking, which is more concerned with globalization and education than moral obligation. Although conservation is still a well discussed issue, many steps have yet to be taken to align society with the goals necessary to preserve a lush natural world. Pinchot held that the natural world exists for the sole "benefit of the people who live [on the Earth]" (Pinchot, 1910, p.33).…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sand County Almanac

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A ‘land ethic’ is a philosophy that guides and regulates the actions humans take when they attempt to change or use the land. I feel that people over use and over-work the land and resources that we have in the world. Sure, I like to have fancy things but when I think about the fact that everyone in the world likes to have these things they don’t need at all it makes me sick. We are killing our planet every day. I don’t like saying ‘we’ need to come up with a cheaper and cleaner form of energy because I feel hypocritical, but that is definitely something that has got to happen. It is imperative that we meet the needs of society today in such a way that we are still able to meet the needs of future generations.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my generation, I am able to catch what is relatively the tail end of this slow extinction. And to be quite honest, I had not devoted a moment of thought to this phenomenon until I read Leopold's passages. In fact, I am always the first one to compliment a new highway project that saves me five minutes of driving or even a tidy farmstead as I pass. Now, more than ever, my thoughts are in limbo. It was just last week when my dad pointed out an area off the highway that displayed miles of slowly rolling cornfields. His reaction was to the beauty of the countryside. Mine was to question his. I found myself thinking about all of the hard work that created that beauty, and then how much more beautiful it was fifty, a hundred, or even two centuries ago. Only the mind's eye can create this beauty now, and that is exactly why Leopold's concerns are validated.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold was a conservationist, forester philosopher, educator, writer and outdoor enthusiast and was among the founding fathers of the North American conservation movement during the first half of twentieth century (Leopold, 1981). He argues that humans are part of a community that includes the land, from the soil to the rivers and seas (Leopold, 1981). According to Leopold (1981), until humans recognize that they are part of the land and act accordingly, they will continue to negatively impact the environment and their own health by extension (Leopold, 1981)…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Muir and Abbey

    • 1014 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is difficult to find writers more passionate about the natural environment than John Muir and Edward Abbey. Both Muir in a section from his book A Thousand-Mile Walk to the Gulf and Abbey in a chapter titled Polemic: Industrial Tourism and the National Parks channel anger and frustration at the environmental policies of their time into literature that argues fervently for preservation of national parks and other areas of wilderness. In Hetch Hetchy Valley, Muir reverently describes in vivid detail the beautiful landscape of a river valley in Yosemite called the Hetch Hetchy Valley, condemning anyone who supports a government plan to dam the Hetch Hetchy River and flood the valley. In a famous quote Muir says, “no holier temple has ever been consecrated by the heart of man” (Muir 112). Abbey employs a highly sarcastic and satirical tone to outline the consequences of further expansion of roads and highways into national parks. He aims to incite anger with sharp language and insults to draw the reader in emotionally. “This is a courageous view, admirable in its simplicity and power… It is also quite insane” (Abbey 422). Both pieces easily stand alone, but when looked at together they suggest even more strongly that it is deceptive and dishonest to advertise industrialization of wilderness as any kind of favorable progress for society. This “progress” does not actually benefit anyone. Those who proclaim this as their reason for supporting industrial development are more likely motivated by the short-term economic benefits they will receive.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defenders of nature became divided between fervent “preservationists” who wanted to stop all human intrusions and more moderate “conservationist.”…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Sand County Almanac

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of Leopold’s arguments were in my opinion good arguments. In the third part, Leopold brings to my attention the obvious ironies of conservation. To promote the appreciation of wildlife and gain political support, one encourages recreational usage of wilderness. That same recreational use destroys the very environment that you would be trying to conserve. Leopold talks about how people want to take a trophy from the wilderness to share or always remember their experience. He says that just being there is a trophy enough. I love to hunt and I love to widdle wood. In Leopold’s eyes I would be taking trophies. He goes into such detail describing small creatures; that I usually would shoot for fun, but he really opened my eyes to how just the slightest change can affect so much in an ecosystem that I think twice.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When looking at things from an ethical perspective, one has to consider how to protect and preserve the basic needs of others as well as their own. There is no difference here when dealing with the well being of animals. Alice Walter and Ted Kerasote are two individuals who deal with ethical issues regarding the well being of animals, and while their stories are vastly different, their main points have overlapping similarities. In Anthony Weston’s A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox, both Walter and Kerasote’s experiences are explicitly detailed through Walter’s essay, “Am I Blue?,” and Kerasote’s excerpt from Bloodties: Nature, Culture, and the Hunt. Throughout both of their experiences, Weston’s three-part concept of ethics is put into full-effect.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldous Huxley

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    production of humans is immoral. Humans have the right to have children, or not have…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epic of Gilgamesh

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think in modern day society we still find ourselves trying to tame nature. With the clearing of rainforests for development and to the taming of animals. I think in today’s society we waste the land and the benefits we get from…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays