I can honestly see all three appeals in this essay. We defiantly see examples of the logical appeal. For example, during the experiment, Aizenman states the participants were told that they could essentially see what exactly went into making these jeans. The article also states that nearly 85% just didn’t want to see that. They didn’t want to see the real lives behind the jeans, even though they had the proof, and a reason to want to know this info. The ethical appeal focuses on the “credibility and good character” of the creator of the argument. In this case I believe it would be Reczek, the experimenter. During the experiment
I can honestly see all three appeals in this essay. We defiantly see examples of the logical appeal. For example, during the experiment, Aizenman states the participants were told that they could essentially see what exactly went into making these jeans. The article also states that nearly 85% just didn’t want to see that. They didn’t want to see the real lives behind the jeans, even though they had the proof, and a reason to want to know this info. The ethical appeal focuses on the “credibility and good character” of the creator of the argument. In this case I believe it would be Reczek, the experimenter. During the experiment