Preview

Agrippina’s Relationship with Other Members of the Imperial Court

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2158 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Agrippina’s Relationship with Other Members of the Imperial Court
Ancient Assessment – Agrippina – by Sophie Mulley

Describe Agrippina’s relationship with other members of the imperial court. (10 MARKS)

“Agrippina was a formidable adversary. She had political allies at all levels, acquired during Claudius’ reign, and she knew how to exploit her Augustan lineage and descent from Germanicus to the full.” – Griffin

Agrippina the younger is recognized as one of the most ambitious women in history who encompasses a great desire for power, wealth and supremacy. The Julio Claudian period was solely a patriarchal society, but this didn’t mean women could not hold any influence. It is in this period we see ambitious women such as Agrippina attaining power through men. Agrippina chose specific individuals with influential talents; she formed political allies with them in the positions of power that would ultimately pave the way to her own desires and ambitions centered mostly around the promotion of Nero, and what Tacitus describes as “a vigorous, almost masculine despotism.”

Agrippina acquired political support and influence she needed through the orator Seneca and the praetorian prefect Afrianus Burrus. These two figures played an important role throughout the rule of Agrippina. They are quite often mentioned together, as if they had worked together, but they both worked individually with only the same beliefs and values in the state. Seneca and Burrus “enjoyed a unanimity rare in partners in power and were equally influential by different methods” says Tacitus. This would both be of service to, and see to the downfall of Agrippina for “although they owed their positions to her, had little love for petticoat government” Quotes Scullard.

The Relationship between Agrippina and Seneca was purely to insure Nero’s accession to the throne, and to ultimately grant Agrippina the power and authority needed to have her desired influence on the Empire. The relationship began as a strong bond that allowed both, prosperity and power,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Agrippina was the mother of the Emperor Nero. Her influence on politics and her ambition dates back to his birth and spans till the time her powers began to decrease, and eventual assassination in 59 AD. Nero was 17 at the time he succeeded Claudius. In the early years of his reign, Agrippina held great influence over her son and political affairs. However her downfall began in his inaugural address, when she was indirectly denounced by Nero, who later began to rely on others, such as Seneca, Burrus and Poppaea Sabina.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tacitus stated that Agrippina’s “passion to acquire wealth was unbounded”. This is indeed indicative of the general consensus of ancient sources toward her, with greed, manipulation and ambition forming the central tenets of her character. Her marriages played a central role in fulfilling her idealistic goals, in the process, propelling her into the public consciousness.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The enormous favours that he heaped on them at the beginning of his reign has a political purpose…

    • 333 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agricola’s pre-military life and early military life affected his attributes and shaped his future to give the qualities for success. Before his first birthday the Emperor ordered for the death of his senator father because of his refusal to prosecute the Emperor’s second cousin, this left Agricola fatherless with only the support of his mother to nurture him to maturity and an early influential reference of what happens to those who don't obey their superiors.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman society from republican times through to the empire worked on a system of “patronage”. Patron- client relationships existed through all levels of roman society. A patron was expected to assist his clients and their relatives by advancing their careers. In return the client had to support and further the cause of the patron, often giving them gifts. The system of patronage was particularly important for noble families of Rome, and as can be seen by Agrippina, the women of the imperial household could exert their influence as patrons. Throughout the reign of Claudius, and in the early years of her sons reign, Agrippina placed some of her clients into key positions. In AD49 used her influence with Claudius to have Seneca recalled from exile and give position as Praetor. She helped Seneca as she wanted him to tutor her son. Another of Agrippina’s Protégés was Burrus, Tacitus argues that she wanted to “remove the commanders of the guard, Lucius Geta and Rufrus Crispinus, whom she regarded as to loyal the memory and the cause of ….. Messalina children.” So Agrippina asserted to Claudius that the guard was split by their rivalry and that unified control Agrippina would mean stricter discipline , whereupon the patron client command was transferred Burrus, who was a distinguished solider but fully aware whose initiative was behind the appointment.”…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boudicca and Her Revolt

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Suetonius: leaving pockets of potential trouble (client kingdoms) behind Roman lines had become only too clear.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power could be an abstract term with numerous meanings that's often utilized by historians however rarely outlined. For the needs of this discussion, power is viewed through the lens of one common divisor that underlies conquest: dominance - in any type, degree, or context – as a central feature not solely of imperial growth, however additionally of the many, if not most, human societies. Cabeza de Vaca’s Narrative provides trendy readers with distinctive insights into the cultural dimensions of power and methods for its mediation from numerous views within the sixteenth century. additionally to physical, emotional, and psychological violence and trauma, the Narrative addresses power structures inherent in competitive social hierarchies, territorial boundaries, assertion of sovereignty and legitimacy of authority, ritual symbols and expressions, economic exchange, and therefore the commoditization of ideology, all of that mix in keeping with apparently endless permutations and contingencies to provide multiple outcomes. No parties concerned in these advanced interactions were ever a similar once more.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agrippina’s particular power was exercised most effectively during the reigns of Claudius and Nero, as portrayed in modern and ancient sources through her actions and the symbols of her power. Even from the reign of Caligula, however, she exercised more power than the average Roman woman, largely due to her Julian blood and connection with Gaius, who made her an honorary Vestal Virgin and allowed her to sit with him at the games. The title of Vestal Virgin was significant, as it allowed her to have legal advantages. But this is insignificant when compared with the power she rose to during her later life.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that Nero’s execution of Agrippina was commanded by her plot to set Rubellius Plautus on…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When news was out that Nero had murdered Agrippina, Nero defended himself to the senate, reporting that his mother was plotting to kill him, meaning he had to retaliate first. Shockingly, the senate seemed unaffected by Agrippina’s…

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agrippina was related to the Claudian ‘gens’, one of the oldest and most illustrious patrician families with imperial connections. Her father Germanicus had risen through the cursus honoroum to two consulships and the proconsulships of Germany and Gaul. Germanicus’s brother was the brother was the future Claudian emperor, Claudius. Agrippina’s family lineage was therefore immensely prestigious. Her mother is quoted twice by Tacitus asserting her descent from the blood of the divine Augustus. According to revisionist Barret, Agrippina would have learnt from her mother in her formative years a powerful sense of her important place in the scheme of things.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    agrippina the younger

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Agrippina the Younger was an Empress. Her rank in Roman society was higher than that of her husband, as she was the sister of an emperor, Caligula. Because she was so high up, she was allowed to attend senate meetings and watch and listen behind a curtain. Agrippina murdered and deceived many people throughout her life. The first of these was her second husband, who it is suspected Agrippina poisoned. She then convinced Claudius, her Uncle to marry her, in order that her son, Nero, would become Emperor. Just 4 years after her marriage to Claudius, she murdered him so that Nero became the Emperor of Rome.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agnodice's Legacy

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Agnodice’s legacy is a very peculiar one, and whether it is true or not has been debated over and over, time and time again. Any and everything we know about her life comes from the Latin author, Gaius Julius Hyginus. He wrote her story in his collection titled, “Fabulae”, which is the only surviving record of her existence. Fabulae roughly translated can mean “fable” or “story”, hinting that Hyginus’ accounts of Agnodice’s life and accomplishments have a possibility of being fictional. Even the name, Agnodice, translated from Ancient Greek means “chaste before justice.” This is another reason some believe that Agnodice is a mythical character created by Hyginus, as giving such characters names that coincide with their tale was done commonly…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tacitus states that from the moment Agrippina married Claudius “the country was transformed”, “her passion to acquire money was unbounded. She wanted it as a stepping stone to supremacy”. This marriage is also described as one dominated by the power and influence of Agrippina, “as soon as Agrippina moved into the palace she gained complete control over Claudius” (Dio Cassius) Agrippina is shown as a woman who hastily secured her means of dominance and privileges to elevate her power and status. Dio Cassius’ Roman History also notes Claudius’ feelings are “enslaved by Agrippina” and once the incestuous marriage had been legitimised by the Senate, Claudius arguing it was “beneficial for the state” (Suetonius), he married her without “a single day’s delay” (Dio Cassius) reinforcing Agrippina’s control and manipulation over Claudius. Agrippina was willing to do anything for Nero to become emperor, “let him kill me but let him rule” Tacitus. Modern historian Richard Bauman notes that this period shows Agrippina at the height of her career and influence in Rome, seen in Claudius’ eventual adoption of Nero in 50 and “a string of successes for Agrippina” (Bauman). According to Bauman, the adoption of Nero was one of numerous examples of Agrippina’s dominance…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays