Preview

Aggression And Violent Behavior Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aggression And Violent Behavior Paper
Aggression and Violent Behavior 18 (2013) 605–610

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Aggression and Violent Behavior

Ethical, legal and social issues surrounding research on genetic contributions to anti-social behavior
Colleen M. Berryessa, Nicole A. Martinez-Martin, Megan A. Allyse ⁎
Stanford University, Center for Biomedical Ethics, United States

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Article history:
Received 26 March 2013
Received in revised form 27 June 2013
Accepted 16 July 2013
Available online 22 July 2013

Scientific study of genetic contributions to chronic antisocial behavior has stemmed from many lines of research in recent years. Genetic research involving twin, family, and adoption studies
…show more content…
Although there have been some efforts to educate judges on scientific evidence since Daubert, such as conferences, programs and pamphlets, these resources are not extraordinarily exhaustive and most judges are still under qualified to understand the validity and importance of bioscientific research on antisocial behavior in court.
This becomes additionally complicated when a psychiatrist or scientist gives expert testimony on behavioral evidence in court, such as testimony claiming a defendant 's genetic or biological predisposition to specific types of antisocial behavior, to a judge or jury who, trusting those labeled “experts,” might take opinions expressed in expert testimony at face value or as fact without knowing the scientific reliability the testimony. Several studies (Ivković & Hans, 2003;
Raitz, Greene, Goodman, & Loftus, 1990; Vidmar & Diamond, 2001) have shown that jurors are very influenced and persuaded by expert testimony on scientific evidence, even if they do not fully comprehend it. Juries are thus very likely to put too much weight on behavioral genetic evidence when trying to understand a defendant
…show more content…
Retrieved from www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/
38/part/1 (on December 5, 2012).
Ashworth, A. (2004). Social control and antisocial behaviour: The subversion of human rights. Law Quarterly Review, 120, 263.
Aspinwall, L., Brown, T., & Tabery, J. (2012). The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism increase or decrease sentences for psychopaths? Science, 337(6096), 846–849.
Baker, L., Bezdjian, S., & Raine, A. (2006). Behavioral genetics: The science of antisocial behavior. Law and Contemporary Problems, 69(1–2), 7–46.
Beecher-Monas, E., & Garcia-Rill, E. (2006). Genetic predictions of future dangerousness.
Law and Contemporary Problems, 69, 301.
Birch, D. (September 25). Crime, genetics link not found conference closes amid unusual quiet after weekend protest: Baltimore Sun (Retrieved from http://articles. baltimoresun.com/1995-09-25/news/1995268062_1_genetics-violence-genesexist on December 5, 2012).
Breggin, P. (1995). Campaigns against racist federal programs by the Center for the Study of Psychiatry and psychology. Journal of African American Men, 1(3), 3–22.
Brunner, H. G., Nelen, M., Breakefield, X. O., Ropers, H. H., & van Oost, B.A. (1993). Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How has this learner developed academic skills as a graduate student in Current Research on Violent Behavior Course?…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    always be the case. Studies have suggested that these juror demands for scientific evidence are…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Q. Wilson and Richard J. Herrnstein 1985 put forward a biosocial theory of criminal behaviour. In their view, crime is caused by combination of biological and social factors. Biological differences between individuals make some people innately more strongly predisposed to commit crime than others. For…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Staton, 58 Wash. 2d 879, 886 (1961) (citations omitted). In addition, this “expert testimony must be based on facts in the case, not speculation or conjecture.” Melville v. State, 115 Wash. 2d 34, 41 (1990). For example, in Miller v. Station, the Washington Supreme Court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the element of causation because the expert’s general statements regarding plaintiff’s injuries had “not been related by the expert witness to the instant case.” Id. at 886. The expert witness in Miller merely stated that, in general, nervousness is one of the contributing factors to a stomach ulcer, but the expert failed to tie plaintiff’s alleged nervousness to her stomach ulcer.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Expert testimony is important in any trial, but determining whether or not the testimony is admissible can lead to other problems. The Daubert Standard is used by trial judges during the preliminary assessment. It is crucial that the trial judge assesses the expert’s testimony on if it is not only scientifically valid, but also if the testimony can be applied to the issues properly. To properly determine if the expert testimony meets the Daubert standard there are five criteria’s that must be met; “(1) whether the theories or techniques on which the testimony relies are based on a testable hypothesis; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subject to peer review; (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error associated with the method; (4) whether there are standards controlling the method; and (5) whether the method is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community” (Kennedy, 2014, p. 1). The Daubert standard prevents trial judges from allowing expert testimony that is not reliable from entering the courtroom as evidence.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.06 Review

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criteria used to establish an expert witness might be the person’s degrees, and the number of years of experience that that person has in the field…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aggression is something that people will experience throughout life whether they are experiencing it directly or indirectly. Throughout the years, aggression has been studied in many different forms and ways. It ranges greatly and can range all the way from destructive behavior down to an insulting remark. Direct aggression would be referred to as a physical altercation or incident and indirect aggression would someone spreading gossip throughout a group of people Aggression comes in many different shapes and sizes. Defining the term aggression has been a major argument throughout the scientific community for many years. The most widely accepted definition of the term aggression was defined by Buss ( 1961: 1) as “a response that delivers noxious…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of twin studies helps explain how there could be genetic factors in aggressive behavior. There are two types of Twin, monozygotic (identical) and Dizygotic (non-identical). If both types are studied in terms of aggression and the M-Z twins are more similar in aggressive behaviour it would suggest there is a genetic influence on aggression. Coccaro et al found that when comparing MZ and DZ twins, over 50 % of variance in aggressive behaviours between MZ twins could be attributed to genetic factors.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness Evidence

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When deciding the guilt or innocence of individuals in court, juries, judges, and police investigators rely on three major types of evidence. Often, experts are relied on for information. For example, the mental state of the individual being accused. This “expert testimony,” is not often relied on in Canadian court because some judges believe the information that is offered by experts, Psychologists in particular, is common sense. There are other judges, however, that are more concerned with the jurors reliance on the information being provided rather than evaluating information on their own. Researcher A. Daniel Yarmey discovered that several research involving the testing of eyewitness…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eye Witness Testimony

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Deffenbacher, Bornstein, Penrod & McGorty (2008). Retrieved on 6-16-2013 from Wrightsmans Psychology and the legal system (chapter 5 pg. 117).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today's court system one of the strongest pieces of evidence, or that most commonly accepted as fact by a jury, is eyewitness testimony. When correct, eyewitness accounts can aid in the conviction of many guilty people. However when it is incorrect, eyewitness testimony can do severe damage. Researchers have found that "more innocent citizens are wrongfully tried and convicted on the basis of eyewitness evidence in Great Britain and North America than by any other factor within the legal system" (Smith, Stinson, & Prosser, 2004, p. 146). Even with the recent background of cases being overturned on the basis of DNA evidence many years after conviction, eyewitness identification is considered by most jurors and judges as the most persuasive sort of evidence. DNA testing contributed to the exonerations of over 100 people in the United States who were on death row. In 80-90% of these cases, eyewitnesses were a key factor in the conviction (Smith, Stinson, & Prosser, 2004). This poses the question of how valid is eyewitness memory. It does indeed appear to be unreliable. So, therefore, the judge and jurors should be alert to the possibility of mistaken identification resulting not only from suggestive law enforcement identification techniques, but also from the inability of human memory. One possibility is to educate the jurors and judge about the problems surrounding eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony can be flawed simply because of the normal and natural memory processes that occur whenever people acquire, retain, and attempt to retrieve information (Loftus, 1979). The validity of eyewitness identification depends on numerous variables. Eyewitness testimony validity can be affected by perception and memory, the weapon focus effect, cross race identification effects, eyewitness confidence and accuracy, and questioning techniques.…

    • 2345 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roles and ethical dilemmas of psychologists as exert witnesses in our court system are undeniably ambiguous. These issues of morality can be seen throughout many case studies. When forensic psychologists or psychiatrist provide expert testimony in court they’re supposed to be objective and not use bias judgment. But is it possible for them to stay equitable without having any biases towards the side that hired them – either the prosecution or the defense. When the law meets psychology, it’s important that we keep in mind the purpose of the expert’s testimony because there is always a chance that an expert can manipulate jury members and judges into bias decisions by forcing their own biases onto them.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    eyewitness

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also, scientific plays important role when identify testimony in a criminal case. Not just based on eyewitness testimony, but also capable of analyze the evidence and atmosphere in order to find out a real crime. Scott Fraser said, “When it comes to witnesses in criminal trials, the accuracy of human memory can mean the difference between life and death.” False eyewitness testimony from sincere people can put innocent people in jail, but it also can free the criminals.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A suspect confessing to a crime is often thought of in a sort of “nail in the coffin” way when it comes to a trial. When a suspect is accused of a crime, and they admit to it themselves, that confession is often prioritized over other evidence. Not only do confessions appeal to a jury, but they generally reassure a witness that they made the right decision when identifying a suspect. However, confessions aren’t always the most reliable source. False confessions account for around 25% of wrongful incarcerations that were later overturned thanks to DNA evidence proving the confessor’s innocence. A study conducted in 2009 aimed to quantify how suspect’s confessions can sway witness testimonies.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examine the role of genetic and environmental factors in the etiology of narrowly and broadly defined alcoholism in women…

    • 298 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays