Preview

Afghanistan: Who Is to Blame? (Editorial Analysis)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1020 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Afghanistan: Who Is to Blame? (Editorial Analysis)
Afghanistan: Who Is To Blame?

The turmoil in Afghanistan is getting worse with each passing day. Terrorists control many parts of the country. As a result, the Afghani people live in constant fear. In efforts to assist this struggling nation, the US and NATO have tried to strengthen the Afghani national forces. Unfortunately, very little real progress has been made toward securing a solid Afghani government.

This paper analyzes two editorials that discuss the current situation in Afghanistan, and who is to blame for the current disarray in the country. One editorial is from a liberal publication (The New York Times), while the other is from a conservative publication (the Washington Times).
Both editorials provide valuable arguments, but neither is effective enough to persuade someone to change their mind about the situation by reading one or the other.

The New York Times’ editorial (“Unfinished Business in Afghanistan” published on June 20, 2008), attempts to persuade their readers that the reason the situation in Afghanistan remains unchanged is because of a lack of action on President Bush’s part. The editorial opens with “Five years after President Bush largely dropped the military operation against the Afghan-based Taliban and Al Qaeda so he could invade Iraq, American and NATO troops are needed as much as ever in Afghanistan to hold back a resurgence of those forces. Yet Washington and its European allies still do not have an effective and comprehensive strategy to combat the threat.” By making such a claim right away, the author automatically tries to persuade readers that President Bush has basically ignored Afghanistan while spending five years in Iraq. The audience of the New York Times consists of upper-middle class urban readers, who are politically liberal. They would not be hard to persuade in this situation. They already have a distrust of President Bush and the situation in Iraq. In terms of trying to persuade someone who is more



Cited: "Editorial - Unfinished Business in Afghanistan - Editorial - NYTimes.com." The New York Times, Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. 11 July 2008<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/opinion/20fri2.html?r=1&oref=slogin&gt;. "Washington Times - EDITORIAL: Fissures on Afghanistan." Washington Times Politics, Breaking News, US and World News. 11 July 2008 <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jun/25/fissures-on-afghanistan/>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Afghanistan is a war torn country located in central Asia. There are currently approximately 319, 000 internally displaced people in Afghanistan. (Encyclopedia of the Nations, 2012) The poverty is extreme, there are frequent natural disasters that tear down cities and villages, (Refugees International, 2001) and the people are in continual danger of violence. This violence includes constant suicide bombings, ambushes, abductions and rocket attacks. In 2009 there were at least 12 of these incidences every day. (Kazem-Stojanovic, 2011) They are living in fear of their lives 24/7. Due to a severe drought in 2011, there is a lack of food and therefore thousands are suffering from starvation. (Refugees International, 2001) There is also the current issue of the coalition forces deciding to take their troops out at the end of 2014. (Amiri, 2012) Citizens fear that once they are gone the Taliban will regain full control again.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C200 Exam

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. In President Obama’s speech at West Point, he announced that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan. He made this decision because he said it was vital to the United States’ national interest. The vital national interest at risk in President Obama’s address is the security and safety of the American people as well as the “security of our allies and the common security of the world.” By involving the military and increasing the troop strength, President Obama can achieve the objectives of his strategy. His objectives are to keep the Taliban from becoming powerful, prevent them from government rule, improve Afghanistan security forces and government so they can manage their own country and prevent Al Qaeda from establishing refuge in other countries. If you follow the framework of several important U.S. documents, such as the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) they will outline this same strategy. The National Defense Strategy states that it is the responsibility of the military to protect ourselves and our allies from attack. It states that the military should help protect and secure our vital interests abroad. U.S. security is linked with the security of the international community. The physical integrity of our country is protected by the military through multiple security controls. One of these security controls is through deployments of the armed forces. The Quadrennial Defense Review states the mission of the U.S. military is to protect the American people and advance our nation’s interests. The vital interests of the United States are intertwined with the integrity and resilience of allies abroad. Our vital interests are security, prosperity, broad respect for universal values and an international order that promotes cooperation among our allies. The President’s vision is to become more powerful domestically while bringing together all elements of national power. We need to help our neighbors…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bajoria, Jayshree, Greg Bruno, and Eben Kaplan. "The Taliban in Afghanistan." Council on Foreign Relations. CFR, 6 Oct. 2011. Web. 23 Feb. 2013. .…

    • 3493 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coffey, Luke. “Afghanistan After 2014: It Won 't Be Perfect, but It Will Be Good Enough.” Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/luke-coffey/afghanistan-after-2014_b_4612474.html (accessed January 23, 2014).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May of 2006, Rex Murphy; a former veteran journalist for the Globe and Mail, understood a great deal more than the average Canadian why Canadian troops are fighting in Afghanistan. In an attempt to help free the many Canadians of the frustration they felt with the government, Murphy published an essay entitled “What We Are Fighting For” that outlines the reasons Canadian troops are fighting in Afghanistan in an expository and informal way that Canadians will be able to understand. Murphy’s essay features an interesting mix of an informative but persuasive style of writing that attracts the reader to keep reading on and maybe even do some research on the issue of their own. His essay circulates around the speculation that “Canada agreed that eliminating a government that had sheltered and nursed the terrorist organization that committed the atrocity of 9/11 was both right and in our own self-interest, that not pursuing the Taliban and al-Qaeda would only leave Afghanistan as a potential site of similar designs in the future”. This being his thesis briefly answers the underlying question of the essay and he later goes on to answer the question in more depth. The essay itself supports Murphy’s thesis with great strength because Murphy’s reasoning is sound and concrete, he has done his research to give his essay accuracy, and his methods and style of writing are effective.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Obama the Machiavellian

    • 3380 Words
    • 14 Pages

    MacAskill, Ewen. "Barak Obama sets out new strategy or Afghanistan war" The Guardian. March 27, 2009. Accessed May 2, 2012. www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/27/obama-new-strategy-afghanistan-war…

    • 3380 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What Are We Fighting For”, written by veteran journalist Rex Murphy (2006), suggests that the motives behind the activities of Canadian troops in Afghanistan strike a balance between our nation’s own self-interest and humanitarian efforts.. Murphy begins by summarizing the commitment of the Canadian government in efforts to eliminate the Taliban and al-Qaeda; both were participating forces in the 9/11 attacks, which affected both the USA and Canada alike.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rex Murphy’s essay, “What We Are Fighting For,” strives to outline the reasons behind the Canadian governments’ continued deployment of troops to Afghanistan. Murphy reviews the initial reasoning for deploying troops overseas, then continues on to explain that simply disbanding the Taliban government is insufficient. He indicates that the UN led mission is also implementing peacekeeping measures, and Canadian troops, as Peacekeepers remained. Murphy outlines the ambitious peacekeeping goals and provides insight into civil liberties those of us from democratic nations, often take for granted. The author then delves into the intricacies and obstacles faced in attempting to install a democratic government in a country still under threat of Taliban…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet while our principles continue, unscarred and secure, the same is not true in Afghanistan. There, the peaceful teachings of Islam have been cast aside, and instead are used to promote violence. There, women have no rights to education. There, human trafficking and massacres against civilians have become common. There, leaders are self-appointed. We are fighting for their safety and protection as much as our own. The battle we share stems from a desire to fight those oppressing freedom, not civilians caught in the crossfire. Food, refuge, and medical aid will be available to our friends.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Afghanistan is a place that is constantly at war and involved in conflict. The people there are used to it and it cannot be controlled or escaped. Najaf tells the viewpoint of foreign invaders and also of the people who live there. He also compares it to natural disasters- pushing forward the point that conflict and wars cannot be controlled. Afghanistan’s ethnicity is very diverse which a cause of conflict amongst its people is also. Najaf explains that although the country is divided within itself, its people will unite to fight against a common enemy yet will still remain divided.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is the Gender dilemma in current Afghanistan (2010) Retrieved on 20/01/2012 from the world wide web http://sacket.blogfa.com/post-78.aspx…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay” What are we fighting for,” Rex Murphy discusses what he sees as the most compulsory reasons Canadian troops are in Afghanistan, to support some form of democracy that can resist malevolent influences and provide for its citizens, basic civil opportunities. Murphy begins his discussion with recapping the events leading up to our involvement in the Afghanistan operations, primarily 911, and supporting our ally, the United States in removing a government that supported such atrocities. The Afghanistan mission, which was UN approved, was intent on, most importantly, removing the Taliban and providing stability for its citizens through better government. However, Murphy discusses how without support a new government is not sustainable…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2009 Afghanistan surge, the “bargaining paradigm”, defined by Allen , best reflects President Obama’s decision making process by which he used the ethical lens of “deontology”, discussed by Shaw , as the moral compass of his decisions.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of so many negative factors, the United States has lost a clear reason for why we are at war. Winston Churchill described the conflict of war as a “supreme emergency.” The kind of war being conducted in Afghanistan today falls outside of the definition. America also has no terms regarding what a satisfactory conclusion might look like. The forces will never know when the goal has been met, because the visions have now been blurred. The nation should not be fighting a war without great reason and clear…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War to Save a Nation

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should we interfere in countries that are in civil war or in need of help, or should we as a nation be more concerned about our own issues on the other hand? There are many different viewpoints on whether we should be in Afghanistan or Iraq; both sides of the argument have valid points supported by facts and strong beliefs. I, for one, strongly believe that there should be a continued presence in those countries. I believe it is morally wrong to turn one’s back and pretend nothing is happening. The war in Afghanistan over the past 12 years has come at a great cost in means of money and lives, although the benefits coming from this war are justified in my eyes. In this paper I will go over how the lives being sacrificed have been for a cause that is improving the lives of Afghans, keeping our nation safe from terrorist attacks, why there is a need for justice to be served, how the lives being lost are for a greater good, how the money being spent will lead to a better future for Afghanistan, how Democracy can be achieved, and how terrorism needs to be addressed as a regional issue. For there to be a desirable and meaningful achievement of the goals that we have placed on this war there is need for a continued presence in Afghanistan.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays