Preview

Aeschines Speech Against Timarchus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aeschines Speech Against Timarchus
Dr. Ng,

Thank you for your insights. As for Aeschines’ speech against Timarchus, Aeschines tries to bring Timarchus to account about why he blames the city, and its laws and regulations by saying to him “You will see, then, that Timarchus cannot blame the city for any part of this prosecution, nor can he blame the laws, nor you, nor me, but only himself.” Through Aeschines’ verbal attack over Timarchus, we can question why Aeschines defended the city and its rules and laws against Aeschines’ claims. Were Aeschines’ claims fake or false? Through the attic oratory, we can understand why and how the attic orators performed their jobs, and most probably, they performed it on behalf of some sort of wealthy and notable people, for example, one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ Barbarian Invasions

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages

    8. According to Procopius, “some say that Rome was not captured in this way by Alaric.” What do they say happened?…

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Aeschylus’s Seven Against Thebes, Eteocles had an agreement with his brother that they would alternate the throne every year. However, due to Eteocles’ greed, he refused to step down and his brother gathered an army to take back what was rightfully his(xiv, line 12). This rebellion created by Polyneices had become Eteocles’ most significant obstacle. This resulted in Eteocles creating an army, seven men to guard each gate. Polyneices’ men were suited up with armor and a specialized shields. Eteocles’ greatest tool was his ability to change the interpretation of the blazons his brother’s soldiers carried (367). He talked down the weapons of defense to his men in order to enhance their ability to fight by increasing their confidence.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Eratosthenes Guilty

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1b. In 1b it sates “If so, were the actions of Euphiletos of Oea, resulting in the death of Eratosthenes of Oea, justified by Section 11 of the Laws of Athens?” The act of Euphiletos was not justified because he should have not killed Eratosthenes. Euphiletos says he did this in the heat of the moment and that he felt that Eratosthenes had corrupted his wife and brought shame to his family and insulted him but in fact this did not happen in the heat of the moment. This is a case of premeditation. Euphiletos has hated Eratosthenes from the beginning. The old women who had spoken to Euphiletos had said, “The person who is disgracing you and your wife happens to be our mutual enemy.” Notice that the women had said “mutual enemy” meaning that Euphiletos had…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sweetlove26

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Aristophane chose to make his point through a fictional story, I believe, to come off as humerous to himself. He obviously doesn't mind seeing others suffer, so he didn't quite mind getting his point through in this manner. In the introduction of the passage, it says that Aristophane wrote a play called The Clouds that “...viciously satirized Socrates as manipulative...and an...impractical teacher who taught students to circumvent the law”(Plato 89). Aristophane didn't mind hurting Socrates just like he found the story and crisis of the beings humorous.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading "The Speech of Callicles" I noticed that Philosophers were not what I originally thought they were. I have always pictured them being men who were ahead of there time. Who were searching for the answers to life. In the first paragraph these beliefs I once had about philosophy were changed. Callicles states that Philosophers would get into pointless arguments about the problems of everyday life rather than look for the truth. They would also attempt to make a man who doesn't study philosophy but studies practical affairs second guess himself. No matter what side of the argument the man would speak about the philosopher would take the other side. The distinction made in paragraph one is that nature and custom are antagonistic to each other. Nature being the order and behavior of all living things that make up the universe, and custom meaning the everyday habits that have fallen upon society. I feel that they are…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aeschines sets the stage to his prosecution, against Timarchus, by reading out laws and putting them into some context. He points out that there are laws to protect a free-born child or free-born woman from “any person [who] acts as pander”. (Aeschines ¶ 14) So both free born women and children are not to indulge others in distasteful acts. There are laws that allow people who are outraged, whether ''a child, or a man or woman, or any one, free or slave” to prosecute the person who has wronged them. (Aeschines, ¶ 15-17) This allows Aeschines to prosecute Timarchus since he claims to have not only been outraged by his actions. Also he broke some the laws that prohibits him from holding public office and addressing the people because he has prostituted his person. (Aeschines, ¶ 21) There is a law that protects fathers and mothers from the neglect of their children,…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Devil And Daniel Webster

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    orator. He had a way of using words to pursued the opinion of others, sometimes by conveying feelings or emotion. The play starts out in the ornate home of Jabez and Mary Stone, right after their wedding has taken place. The Fiddler, who sat upon a Cider Barrel, played a tune on the Fiddle, and all of the guests danced to it. Basically, it was a wedding reception. At first, there was nothing more than small talk going on, but by using even this smalltalk,…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earlier in the text Archidamus, a Spartan, explains that the Spartan’s slowness in decision making is due to their “clear-headed self-control” (27.84). However, they do not exhibit this quality when Alcibiades easily manipulates them into trusting him. He begins his argument by asserting that others have done “worse things” in the past than deserting their country in a time of need. However, instead of actually citing what instances he is referring to, he compensates for his lack of evidence by telling his audience that he was a better “[leader] of the city as a whole” (127). Alcibiades is manipulating his “evidence” into seeming more substantial than it truly is by telling the audience that these “others… have incited the mob to worse things” (127). However, he is actually using persuasive rhetoric to shift the blame off of himself and onto a made up third party. This tactic is effective on the Spartans because Alcibiades creates a scapegoat that both lessens the impact of Alcibiades’ betrayal and makes him seem like a better leader than he was. Essentially Alcibiades is taking his illogical argument and reforming it as something that is not only perceived as logical, but also as a reason that his betrayal was necessary. Similarly Pericles praises the Athenians as being “[people] who think through what they will take in hand, and discuss it thoroughly” (42.40). However, after having heard Alcibiades speech “they were far more earnestly bent on the expedition than they had been before” (120.19). Contrary to Pericles’ belief, the Athenians’ were unable take a step back and truly analyze Alcibiades’ speech. This means that his speech was so persuasive to these lovers of sophistry that they didn't give a second thought to opposing it. Alcibiades begins his speech, once again, with an appeal to his audience’s logos.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This ancient Athenian murder trial centralizes around the expectations of marriage, the role of women in ancient Greece, and the dangers a husband faces after failing to properly supervise his wife. Euphiletus stands accused of the murder of Eratosthenes, his wife’s lover. According to Athenian law, if a husband finds his wife in bed with another man, it is the husband’s right to determine what penalty the male adulterer will face. The Husband could demand he pay a fine, or even justifiably kill him. The time period of Euphiletus’ trial had come to acknowledge financial compensation as the common settlement for such offenses. Eratosthenes’ family is having Euphiletus prosecuted for premeditated murder; leaving Euphiletus to convince a jury his actions where perfectly legal. He must paint himself as the real victim, a respectable law abiding citizen forced to uphold the law and carryout the proper punishment Eratosthenes earned. All to protect the honor of his wife, children, home and name as best he could. If his defense fails in the eyes of the jury, Euphiletus will face execution.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timaeus Vs Plato

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Creator copied this world, regardless of how its imperfections may appear to support otherwise, from an eternal, immutable, and perfect model. The Creator, or God, combined the elements of earth, air, fire, and water to create the universe and all within it. As this universe would be the only copy made, no additional material remained. With order considered perfection, the God turned a disorderly substance into an orderly sphere which would become the universe. Next, God created heaven and with it time, which had not been needed in the eternal model. Then, four species were designed yet only created one, that of the gods. It became the responsibility of the gods to create the other species, water, air, and land creatures. Among these creatures…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MARK ANTONy SPEECH

    • 381 Words
    • 1 Page

    he is giving him a funeral. But in a way I believe he saying that Caesar…

    • 381 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aeschylus The Oresteia

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Oresteia” is a brilliant piece of work written by Aeschylus which has three incredible plays. The main focus of “The Oresteia” is about the termination of the spell cast by the House of Atreus. It all began with the king, “Agamemnon” killing his own fleshing blood, Iphigenia. Because Agamemnon killed Iphigenia, Clytemnestra who was the mother of Iphigenia and the wife of Agamemnon grew quite heated and at the moment wanted to take her husband’s life. In addition to that, Agamemnon cheated on Clytemnestra by bringing Cassandra, the princess of Troy when he made his triumphant return from the Trojan War.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timaeus Vs Plato

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our fascination with explaining the universe is not a modern concept, and historically, Aristotle and Plato, whilst they differed in their views of the world, both assembled compelling arguments to respectively portray this. This essay will serve to demonstrate the concept of 'world ' and 'worlds ' in the work of Plato and Aristotle, and how they differentiate and coincide to define their individual philosophies of nature. I will also contrast and compare the way in which each of these texts address the concept of motion in their respective worlds.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role of Tiresias

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Oedipus brings Tiresias to the palace, he reveals another side of Oedipus’s personality. At first, Oedipus seems like the faithful king, as he blamed Tiresias for treason and said that he was “Unlawful, unfriendly too to the state that bred and reared you- you withhold the word of god.” (Line 367) This allegation may appear out of good will to save the city of Thebes, however his strong desire to know continued to build up and eventually he snaps. Tiresias accuses him as the murderer of Laius and finds this outrages. Tiresias´s accusation stirs up Oedipus’s anger and brings out his inner child. He denigrates Tiresias, which is something a child would do and not an honored king. At the breaking point, he mocks Tiresias, saying, “ You’ve lost your power, stone-blind, stone-deaf – senses, eyes blind as stone!” (Line 423). At the beginning it seemed unlikely that such a kind king as Oedipus would be a murderer. As the readers are exposed to Oedipus’s more aggressive side it becomes believable that he could have killed Laius. They learn that Oedipus is not really the king that they thought he was, because of Tiresias.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Speakers are made

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    discover that in fact there is a “Speaking Gene” but I wouldn’t hold my breath…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays