Advantages and Disavantages of Meg Whitman
Computers & Education 57 (2011) 2548–2558
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Computers & Education journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu
A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing
Pei-Lin Liu
Department of Foreign Languages, National Chiayi University, 85 Wenlong, Mingsuin, Chiayi 621, Taiwan, ROC
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history: Received 12 November 2010 Received in revised form 18 March 2011 Accepted 27 March 2011 Keywords: Concept mapping English as second language Writing proficiency Writing performance
a b s t r a c t
This study aims to examine the effect of using computerized concept maps during the pre-writing phase on learners’ writing performance. The research questions were: (1) What are the impacts of different computerized concept mapping treatments (no-mapping, individual-mapping, and cooperativemapping) on writing performance for learners of different writing proficiencies (high-level, middlelevel, and low-level)? (2) Does the quality of the concept maps constructed cooperatively exceed the quality of the concept maps constructed individually? (3) Does the map quality correlate to the learner’s writing performance? Ninety-four freshmen enrolled in an English course were divided into high-level, middle-level, and lowlevel learners according to their baseline writing scores. The experimental part of the study took place over two-hour class periods for nine weeks. All participants went through all three treatments for accomplishing three writing assignments. It was found that both computerized mapping treatments had equally positive effects on low-level and middle-level learners compared with the no-mapping treatment. However, high-level learners performed significantly better with the individual-mapping treatment than with the other two treatments. The quality of the concept maps constructed cooperatively exceeded the quality of those constructed individually. The quality of the maps was
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Computers & Education journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu
A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing
Pei-Lin Liu
Department of Foreign Languages, National Chiayi University, 85 Wenlong, Mingsuin, Chiayi 621, Taiwan, ROC
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history: Received 12 November 2010 Received in revised form 18 March 2011 Accepted 27 March 2011 Keywords: Concept mapping English as second language Writing proficiency Writing performance
a b s t r a c t
This study aims to examine the effect of using computerized concept maps during the pre-writing phase on learners’ writing performance. The research questions were: (1) What are the impacts of different computerized concept mapping treatments (no-mapping, individual-mapping, and cooperativemapping) on writing performance for learners of different writing proficiencies (high-level, middlelevel, and low-level)? (2) Does the quality of the concept maps constructed cooperatively exceed the quality of the concept maps constructed individually? (3) Does the map quality correlate to the learner’s writing performance? Ninety-four freshmen enrolled in an English course were divided into high-level, middle-level, and lowlevel learners according to their baseline writing scores. The experimental part of the study took place over two-hour class periods for nine weeks. All participants went through all three treatments for accomplishing three writing assignments. It was found that both computerized mapping treatments had equally positive effects on low-level and middle-level learners compared with the no-mapping treatment. However, high-level learners performed significantly better with the individual-mapping treatment than with the other two treatments. The quality of the concept maps constructed cooperatively exceeded the quality of those constructed individually. The quality of the maps was
References: Anderson-Inman, L., & Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based cognitive mapping: A tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(6–13), 6–8. Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (1996). Computer-based concept mapping: enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(4), 302–306. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: active studying for active learners. Computing Teacher, 21(1), 6–11. Ariew, R., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 237–259. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune. Bruillard, E., & Baron, G. L. (2000). Computer-based concept mapping: a review of a cognitive tool for students. In D. Benzie, & D. Passey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational uses of Communication and Information Technologies (pp. 331–338). Beijing: China. Boxtel, C., Linden, J., Roelofs, E., & Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping: provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 40–46. Chai, C. (2006). Writing plan quality: relevance to writing scores. Assessing Writing, 11, 198–223. Chang, K., Sung, Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experiment Education, 71(1), 5–23. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, Y. M. (2010). An enhanced learning diagnosis model based on concept–effect relationships with multiple knowledge levels. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 53–67. 2558 P.-L. Liu / Computers & Education 57 (2011) 2548–2558 Dunston, P. J. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(2), 57–65. Feng, Q. Y. (2004). A research on teaching concept mapping writing to fourth-graders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chiayi, Taiwan: National Chiayi University. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). The pregnant pause: an inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 229–243. Fraser, K. M. (1993).Theory based use of concept mapping in organization development: Creating shared understanding as a basis for the cooperative design of work changes and changes in working relationships. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Ithaca: Cornell University. Freeman, L. A. (2004). The power and benefits of concept mapping: measuring use, usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction. Secience Education, 26(2), 151–169. Giombini, L. (2004). From thought to conceptual maps: CMAPTools as a writing system. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept mapping: Connecting educators (pp. 179–187). Spain: Pamplona. Giombini, L. (2008). Concept maps and CMAPTools: a cognitive writing system for the general development of thought in scholar age. In A. J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept mapping: Connecting educators (pp. 218–226). Finland, Tallinn: Estonia & Helsinki. Graves, D. H. (1975). An examination of the writing processes of seven-year-old children. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 227–241. Guastello, E. F. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial & Special Education, 21(6), 356–364. Guveng, H., & Acikgoz, K. U. (2007). The effects of cooperative learning and concept mapping on learning strategy use. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 117–127. Hamp-Lyons, L., & Henning, G. (1991). Communicative writing profiles: an investigation of the transferability of a multiple-trait scoring instrument across ESL writing assessment context. Language Learning, 41(3), 337–373. Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J. C., & Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierachical mapping treatment as an aid to prose processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 237–277. Hunter, L. (2008). CMAP linking phrase constraint for the structural narrowing of constructivist second language tasks. In A. J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept mapping: Connecting educators (pp. 21–29). Finland, Tallinn: Estonia & Helsinki. Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01102.x. Hwang, G. J., Tseng, J. C. R., & Hwang, G. H. (2008). Diagnosing student learning problems based on historical assessment records. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 77–89. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. A. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, assessing, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., & Karen, P. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3–4), 289–308. Kinchin, I., & Hay, D. (2005). Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: a pilot study. Journal of Advance Nursing, 51(2), 182–187. Kroll, B. (2003). Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52, 365–376. Lee, C. F. (2006). A study of teacher’s perceptions of writing instruction at junior high schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kaohsiung, Taiwan: National Sun Yat-Sen University. Leki, I. (2005). The challenges f teaching EFL writing. Taipei: Crane. Lin, Y. L. (2002). The effect of “composition program of integrating picture book and concept mapping” on writing performance of third grade children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University. Liu, L. Q. (2001). A case study of concept mapping in teaching in inclusive class of elementary school-student with hearing impairment embedding cochlear implant was selected as an experimental subject. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Taichung, Taiwan: National Taichung University. Liu, P. L. (2010). Computer-assisted concept maps for English reading and summary writing. Taipei: Crane. Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computer & Education, 54, 436–445. Miller, L. (2009). How to use concept mapping for writing. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from. http://www.ehow.com/how_5729465_use-concept-mapping-writing.html. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Technical Report). Retrieved October 18, 2010, from. http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/Theor. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. London: Cambridge University. Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117–153. Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: a case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34, 566–585. Onozawa, C. (2010). A study of the process writing approach: a suggestion for an eclectic writing approach. Proceedings of Kyoai Gakuen College, Japan, 10, pp.153–163. Osman-Jouchoux, R. (1997a). Linking reading and writing: concept mapping as an organizing tactic. In R. E. Griffin, J. M. Hunter, C. B. Schiffman, & W. J. Gibbs (Eds.), Journeys toward visual literacy (pp. 109–117). America, Wyoming: International Visual Literacy Association, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408955). Osman-Jouchoux, R. (1997b). The use of concept mapping tactics in cognitive strategies for writing summaries of technical material. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Denver: University of Colorado at Denver. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., Triampo, W., & Shih, B. Y. (2010). A multi-expert approach for developing testing and diagnostic systems based on the concept effect model. Computers & Education, 55(2), 527–540. Reader, W., & Hammond, N. (1994). Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Computers & Education, 12, 99–106. Roy, D. (2008). Using concept maps for information conceptualization and schematization in technical reading courses: A case study for computer science majors in Japan. Proceedings of the professional communication conference, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1–12. Royer, J., & Royer, R. (2004). Comparing hand drawn and computer generated concept mapping. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 67–81. Roth, W. M., & Royoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76(5), 531–557. Roth, W. M., & Royoudhury, A. (1993a). Using Vee and concept maps in collaborative settings: Elementary education majors construct meaning in physical science courses. School Science and Mathematics, 93(5), 237–244. Roth, W. M., & Royoudhury, A. (1993b). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: a microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(50), 503–534. Ruddell, R. B., & Boyle, O. F. (1989). A study of cognitive mapping as a means to improve comprehension of expository text. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(1), 12–22. Simone, C. D., Schmid, R. F., & McEwen, L. A. (2001). Supporting the learning process with collaborative concept mapping using computer-based communication tools and process. Educationalresearch and Evaluation, 7(2–3), 263–283. Straubel, L. H. (2006a). Character and plot nodes: writing fiction with concept maps. In A. J. Canas, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, technology (pp. 236–244). San Jose, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica. Straubel, L. H. (2006b). Creative concept mapping: from reverse engineering to writing inspiration. In A. J. Canas, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology (pp. 118–126). San Jose, Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica. Sturm, J., & Rankin-Erickson, J. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 124–139. Sung, P. H. (2010, May 9). The concept map of the enterprise resource planning suppliers. Class project posted to https://elearning.ncyu.edu.tw. Sung, Y. L. (2008). A case study on the use of inspiration to assisted college EFL students’ writing. Unpublished master’s thesis, Taipei, Taiwan: Fu-Jen University. Talebinezhad, M. R., & Negari, G. M. (2007). The effect of explicit teaching of concept mapping in expository writing on EFL students’ self-regulation. Linguistic Journal, 2(1), 69–89. Tompkins, G. E. (1993). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company. Wood, D., & O’Malley, C. (1996). Collaborative learning between peers: an overview. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11(4), 4–9. Wu, C. P. (2003). A study on the use of feedback in senior high school English composition: Students’ preferences and teachers’ practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kaohsiung, Taiwan: National Kaohsiung Normal University. Yang, C. C. (2003). A study of the effects of guided reading and writing directions on Taiwanese senior high school students’ English writing. Unpublished master’s thesis, Changhua, Taiwan: National Changhua University of Education. Ye, Q. H., & Zhan, W. H. (2000). The effect of different teaching strategies toward reading impaired children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Changhua, Taiwan: National Changhua University of Education.