Preview

adolescent crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2972 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
adolescent crime
Live Debate: Tuesday 23 Crime, Culpability, and the Adolescent Brain.
Read the attached article in its entirety and develop a plan to engage in a full debate on Tuesday.
You will be assigned a pro or con side, so plan for either one.
This debate is a graded debate.
Use the article and your chapter to make an argument on your team's behalf.
Have a great weekend. Please review chapter 3

Record: 1
Title:
Crime, Culpability, and the Adolescent Brain.
Authors:
Beckman, Mary
Source:
Science; 7/30/2004, Vol. 305 Issue 5684, p596-599, 3p
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*DEATH
*CRIMINAL behavior
*ATTITUDE (Psychology)
*BRAIN -- Research
*SOCIAL problems
Geographic Terms:
UNITED States
People:
SIMMONS, Christopher -- Trials, litigation, etc.
Abstract:
This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether capital crimes by teenagers under 18 should get the death sentence, the case for leniency is based in part on brain studies. When he was 17 years old, Christopher Simmons persuaded a younger friend to help him rob a woman, tie her up with electrical cable and duct tape, and throw her over a bridge. The latest to do so, Wyoming and South Dakota, considered brain development research in their decisions. Structurally, the brain is still growing and maturing during adolescence, beginning its final push around 16 or 17, many brain-imaging researchers agree. Teens may be highly functioning, but that doesn't make them capable of making good decisions. Brain and behavior research supports that contention, argues professor Steve Drizin, who represents the Children and Family Justice Center at Northwestern on the amicus curiae brief for Simmons. INSET: Adolescence: Akin to Mental Retardation?.
Full Text Word Count:
2720
ISSN:
00368075
Accession Number:
14081046

Persistent link to this record (Permalink):
https://libaccess.fdu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=14081046&site=ehost-live&scope=site

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adolescents’ comparative developmental immaturity contributes to immature decision and criminal behavior with poor decision making, not thinking about the future, giving in to peer pressure, risk taking, unformed identity, impulsivity and self-control. Nathaniel Brazill, age 14 when he committed the crime, and was convicted of first-degree murder facing life in prison without parole. When confronting a Florida grand jury, Brazill would often look confused, when the verdicts were being read. Giving the fact that juveniles are incapable to stand trail. Assistant professor Paul Thompson of neurology at the University of…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority advances their argument by listing some of the mental differences between adults and juveniles such as: “susceptibility to immature behavior”, lack of control over their environment and the peers that come with it, the ability to undergo a character change. These factors were enough for the Court to find the age group a suspect class and hold that they have diminished culpability, at least to an extent that the death penalty becomes an excessive…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of course, “even though teens are experiencing a wildfire of tissue loss in their brains, that does not remove their accountability.” (Thompson 10) There are additionally situations where the child is irrefutably psychopathic (Jenkins 7), but that is the minority. Another of Jenkin’s arguments is the lack of education amongst people concerned with this debate. She claims that children are not sentenced to die in prison (Jenkins 11) or that brain development occurs at the same rate globally (Jenkins 6), but she is wrong.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Roper v. Simmons, Kennedy has once again shown himself to be one of the most powerful legal activists of our times, ready to impose his own sense of morality and law upon the rest of society. In his majority opinion, Justice Kennedy cited “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” and the court find the death penalty for juveniles to be cruel and unusual punishment, and thus unconstitutional. Moreover, Justice Kennedy turned to psychology as the platform for his argument. He stated that adolescents under age of 18 lack maturity and have “a underdeveloped sense of responsibility. Secondly, he stated that juveniles are ““more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure.” Finally, he argued that “the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult. The personality traits of juveniles are more transitory, less fixed.” With the backing of American Psychological Association’s reasoning and Supreme Court’s majority opinion, the Roper decision will go down as one more milestones in the U.S. Supreme Court’s project of judicial activism and taking moral values into…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The findings on the teenage brain shows how their brain can be a cause of their actions. This gave people an insight on why teenages would commit such crimes. Some argued that due to their actions, they should be tried as any other adult and be sentenced to life in prison. However, they should not be sentenced to life as a teenager due to their brains still being in development as a…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It’s never easy to accept the fact that a child can commit a serious crime. The reality is, it happens all over America and it has to be stopped before it starts to spread. The article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins is a more personal stance on the minority side of the situation, but it is the truth. Jenkins argues that The Supreme Court allows the underdeveloped brain theory apply to a situation like murder. This is the argument in Jensen’s case. In the article Jensen states “If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    You see people everyday getting different sentences and consequences for the same crimes. This happens because defendants differ when it comes to mentality, past crimes, culpability and blameworthiness. There has been recent brain imaging technology that shows from the “prefrontal cortex to the limbic area, the teenage brain is undergoing dramatic changes during adolescence in ways that affect teens ability to reason, to weigh consequences for their decisions and to delay gratification long enough to make careful short and long term choices.” (Schwartz 2010). MacArthur and his researches concluded that young people under the age of fifteen should never be tried as an…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Children make mistakes from time to time, and haven’t you ever heard the term “we are only human.” Well now that’s we are in 2013, we can acknowledge the fact that locking up a teen for life without parole violates our constitutions eighth amendment. Took us a while, but with the last three court cases, (Graham vs. Florida, Miller vs. Alabama, Roper vs. Simmons) they have all helped us shed a different look on Juvenile punishment in the past seven years. With the help of scientific research we can distinguish the fact that children don’t have the maturity set to make rational decisions on their own, are often pushed by peer pressure, adolescents don’t tend to consider future consequences, and the child’s vulnerability to external influences. These traits are what the court found to set children apart from adults and are to be handed down a differential punishment than adults when it comes to such serious crimes such as life without parole or the death penalty.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Acuna was the latest person to be convicted with a death row sentence before the age of 18. In “Kids Are Kids until They Commit Crimes” by Marjie Lundstrom writers about a 12 year-old savagely beated a 6 year-old girl to death, Lionel Tate said he was imitating his world wrestler icon. In April. Nathaniel Braizl was charged with first-degree murder at the age of 14, for shooting an English teacher that didn’t let him say goodbye to two girls on the last day of school. In “Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult trial…” by Greg Krikorian researched that teens are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense in court. In studies shown thousands of Juveniles went to an adult trail when they shouldn’t because of their inability to stand the courts proceeding. In “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson discovers that the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers. The brain is like a puzzle that grows fast at the point of learning skills. Also, that the massive loss of brain tissue happens in teenage years at risk taking, controlling impulses, and self-control. The Supreme Court, adjurors on executing young juveniles as killers and to be convicted as adults. Young juveniles are incompetent on being well behaved as what Krikorian says “Seriously Impaired” or is that just an excuse? But knowing that you took a life is just unimaginable and horrifying. So if you did the crime now you’re going to pay the time. Even though your seriously impaired if you know that then why you take advance of that abuse and commit crimes. If you blame the teens you’re basically blaming the parents for unfit parenting their children. They don’t teach their kids form right or wrong and don’t control their kids. So minors are what so to be punished for what…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brain is not fully developed . In the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” posted on the Sacramento Bee on May 25,2001 by Paul Thompson, he points out that “brain cells and connections in the teenage brain are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses ,risk taking and self control”. The fact that teenagers are losing brain cells responsible for their self control makes them vulnerable to making bad choices.Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brain is not fully developed like an adult…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime - young offenders

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It is widely acknowledged in Australia and around the world that young people under the age of 18 should be subject to a system of criminal justice that is separate from the adult system. This is because young people often have lower levels of maturity, as well as knowledge when it comes to the law. Although morals and ethics form an important part of school education (helping young people to make sensible decisions), most aspects of the law do not become clear until they reach adulthood. In NSW young people are legally separated from adults when it comes to rights such as questioning, identification, forensic procedures, having the right to a support person and automatic legal aid. Young people also have a separate court to deal with their and separate legislation offences. The effectiveness of these judicial and legislative provisions inevitably has mixed results. This merits an ongoing monitoring and review process that aims to identify the legal issues faced by young offenders within the criminal justice system, and support and protect young people in the legal system.…

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Recidivism

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the past years, scholars and courts have studied the recidivism of young offenders whom have been convicted as adults. As prosecutions of young offenders continue to increase within the adult court system, many argue whether programs are being used properly to reintroduce repeat offenders back into society. Loughran, put the juvenile process in perspective with his statement, “theoretical intent of broader transfer provisions was clear (sufficient retribution for serious criminal behavior, deterrence through strengthened sanctioning and penalties), there has been only limited definitive empirical evidence regarding the effects of the transfer on the future…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antisocial Youth

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page

    However, some studies of antisocial youth have found rates of self-reported trauma exposure to range from 70 % to 92% (Dembo, LaVoi, et al., 1987; Lewis, Mallouh & Webb, 1989; McMacklin, Morrissey, et al., 1998; Rivera & Widom, 1990; Steiner, Garcia & Matthews, 1997). And research has found that incarcerated youth have high rates of having witnessed a murder (57%), having witnessed a suicide (17%), and having been been shot or shot at (72%) (Wood, Foy et al., 2002).…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He recalled being unnerved being asked questions like “If I kill someone, can I be executed?” To which Garcetti responded “No.” He was also asked “ Right now, I'm under sixteen. If I kill someone, I get out of prison when I'm twenty five, right?” again Garcetti confirmed the boy's belief, “Right” he said. This juvenile only needs to weigh the risk and benefits to whatever he wants to do because the court system will not do to him what it would do to someone else over eighteen.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion: “Those prisoners who have shown an inability to reform will continue to serve life sentences. The opportunity for release will be afforded to those who demonstrate the truth of Miller’s central intuition — that children who commit even heinous crimes are capable of change.” (McGrough) Showing we can be comfortable with this assessment without adopting the credulous view that juvenile killers assume no accountability for their offenses because “my brain made me do it.” Clearly most minors don’t execute vicious crimes, and those who do must pay some price. Lessened amount for the realistic or ethical contemplation doesn’t mean any amount at all. Also, some killers who performed their crimes when they were young maintain to pose a risk to society decades later, and judges and parole boards can take that into…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics