Preview

Act Utilitarian Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Act Utilitarian Analysis
An act utilitarian evaluates each action to see the sum of good and evil it creates. According to the principle of utility, giving the medicine to the surgeon who has saved many lives, is the morally right choice. If the surgeon lives, he/she can continue to save the life of others and therefor creates the most net happiness not just for the patient, but the family members and close friends of the patient. If the medicine was given to a child or musician, it would not compare to the net happiness a surgeon would create in the long run. Also, most homeless people are not well known in a community and usually do not have family members, which would be a waste of the medicine. Ex convicts are more likely to commit a crime than a surgeon would,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clinicians are expected to provide medical services to help others. However, there is a debate about whether clinicians should treat friends and family, members also known as non-patients. “Treatment of non-patients is widespread, with some studies reporting nearly 100 percent of physicians engaging in this practice” (Latessa & Ray, 2005, p.42). A case was presented where a physician assistant (PA Brian) was asked to treat his supervising physician (Dr.Yarnell) for different medical conditions while prescribing multiple controlled substances. Legal standards provide vague ethical guidance regarding this issue and leave a lot of blank spaces open for clinician interpretation. In Dr.Yarnell and PA Brian’s case there were numerous ethical dilemmas that can be examined under the four ethical principles of medicine: beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism Act means to do the right action that will benefit a good amount of people over any other option. In the two examples I read from Bernard Williams “A Critique of Utilitarianism” I realized those were two difficult choices these two men had to make. However, if we follow the Utilitarianism Act, George would of taken the job offer and Jim would unfortunately sacrifice one of the protestors to save the rest. By George taking the job offer, it would benefit his family financially and also help his family’s emotional battle. Also, George opposing chemical and biological warfare would mean he wont have much interest compared to the other gentlemen that had much more interest on the subject. This will benefit a large amount of people…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of utilitarianism classifies actions of being "morally" right or wrong solely based on the results and outcomes of the actions. This paper will analyze the problem that Arthur, "the art dealer", faces with artwork pieces he stumbles upon. Arthur's predicament is that he is given an opportunity to buy looted artworks. His dilemma is to either purchase or to not purchase the art work. This paper will evaluate the two analysis views of a utilitarian: act (extreme) and rule (restricted).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitariansim is an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mills that is founded on moral judgements or policies that focuses on bringing forth the greatest satistfaction or happiness for the greatest number of people. It can be described as quantitative and reductionst approach to ethics and contrasts with the deontology theory which do not regard the consequences of an act as a way to determine its moral value. Considering this dilemma, the Student nurse had to consider which act would bring forth the greatest good for the greatest number. One could argue, that the only person that mattered in this situation was the patient, since it was concerning her, however once may also argue that the decision she would make would have an impact on those around her and society around her in general. For instance, if she decides to amputate she wouldn’t come to hospital as often when it comes to her leg ulcers. This would result to empty beds meaning that someone who may need a bed for more dire reasons are more likely to have it. Furthermore, the costs taken from the NHS to treat her leg continually would decrease meaning that the chance of the government cutting down on other services would decrease. Also, she would not be in as much pain as she was in when she had the ulcerated leg. If she gets a prosthetic leg her mobility would improve and she may be able to mobilize better than she did previously. Although these outcomes may not appear obvious but the impact is undeniable. However, one may also argue that if she doesn’t amputate her family and friends may be happier with the decision (considering that all her family members share the same opinion with her daughter). She may be happier as well considering she has been living with her leg for a long time. The whole argument would result to determining whether her quality of life is better if she amputates or…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act and Utilitarianism

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the view that a religious concept of love is the most difficult to put into practice. (20 Marks)…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You Decide Memo

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are three patients in need of a transplant; Ozzy, Lisa and Jerry. The first patient is Ozzy; he has been homeless for the past ten years. His heart condition is due to constant drug abuse and overdosing on crack cocaine. In the past few months he has started working with troubled teens at a local homework and tutoring hangout. If he receives the heart transplant he will live another 10-15 years and will be able to continue to be a mentor to teens. Because of his history with drugs, it is a high risk to choose him as a recipient. Drug abuse is a serious illness and he may relapse causing the new heart to become damaged and die within a few months. Lisa is a 12 year old with a lifetime of health issues. Her heart was damaged after fighting pneumonia the year before. Unfortunately because of her health history, a heart transplant won’t guarantee she will make it past her 20’s. Dr. Doe, her father, is also a doctor at the same hospital working in a different department. He has offered a substantial amount of money to the hospital so that his daughter can receive the transplant. So far the understanding of utilitarian ethics is "the greatest happiness for the greatest number," but I must also consider deontology for this case. (Levith) According to Immanuel Kant, “It is goodwill that directs people to do what they ought to do rather…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his piece, “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism” J. J. C. Smart illustrated just how different extreme utilitarianism and restricted utilitarianism are from each other and which one is more realistic to follow. Smart developed this idea by supplying his readers with various examples on each side and explaining them thoroughly. Smart’s objective from presenting this piece is to show just how unreasonable restricted utilitarianism is in most, if not all situations. He also explains why people should live their lives the way an extreme utilitarian would. Through the course of this paper there will be multiple examples of each kind of utilitarianism, restricted and extreme, and Smart’s opinions on the matter. While some examples will support…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianists, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, said, “The right action is the one that, on balance, promotes the most happiness, or the greatest amount of pleasure over pain” (Steinbock p.9), and “Man desires as much happiness and as little suffering as possible, and nothing else is worth desiring” (Fenigsen p.244). I can’t say that I always agree with utilitarianism, but in this case of PAS I convinced that doctors have to satisfy the small amount of terminally ill patients what is very popular in this ethical theory. This way of thinking might be criticized by Kantianism which advocates promoting the happiness not only for few people. Some cases from countries and a few states in USA, where PAS is legal, show that it might happen that satisfying some people doctors could abuse others, but it’s not too much occasions, because the number of people who ask for help is still so small, and the affairs of abuse are rare. For example, the statistic in 2010 in Oregon shows that 96 Oregonians asked their doctors to prescribe a deadly barbiturate which they could ingest causing their own death; 65 of them went ahead and did so. This mode of dying accounts for just 0.2% of death in Oregon (Brennan p. 18). Also the request of PAS was from really terminally ill patients. In the Netherlands and Belgium the large majority of the patient suffered from…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relating to “Tyrant,” should the patient be treated? Deontology clashes with utilitarianism when the patient is being diagnosed for his mysterious illness. For this situation in “Tyrant” a deontologist would say the ethical action would be to treat the patient and not based your decision on what the patient has done or plans to do. It would not be ethical to refuse him treatment or treat him wrong on purpose. Flip the roles to a utilitarianism, and they would say the ethical action would be the action that benefits the greatest number. It would be ethical to not treat the patient for the civilians of his country can be free of the genocide. It would not be ethical to treat him because it only benefits the patient rather than benefitting his country peoples. In “Tyrant” you can see how the two theories clashed when Dr. Chase and Dr. Cameron are deciding to treat the patient or…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Utilitarianism is a moral principle that holds that the morally right course of action in any situation is the one that produces the greatest balance of benefits over harms for everyone affected (Andre & Velasquez, n.d.). How would utilitarian thinkers view physician-assisted suicide? Utilitarians would assess each individual situation and determine the right course of action which is relative to the unique circumstances. For the utilitarians, the…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A utilitarian model of ethics is one where the greatest good is produced for the greatest number of people. As explained in the text, payola is the act of using money to get air play. They further add that statistics show a significant correlation between air play and generated profit from that song.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The use of utilitarianism when making moral decisions leads to an injustice society, evaluate this claim.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays