acquisition in multinational coperation
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1044-4068.htm IJCMA
21,2
A re-evaluation of conflict theory for the management of multiple, simultaneous conflict episodes
186
Received 7 May 2008
Accepted 25 May 2009
James Speakman
IESEG School of Management, Catholic University of Lille, Lille, France, and
Lynette Ryals
Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK
Abstract
Purpose – This conceptual paper aims to draw upon recent complexity and organizational psychology literature to examine conflict episodes, exploring the limitations of the predominant research paradigm that treats conflict episodes as occurring in sequence, as discrete isolated incidents.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper addresses a long-standing issue in conflict management research, which is that the predominant typology of conflict is confusing. The complexity perspective challenges the fundamental paradigm, which has dominated research in the conflict field, in which conflict episodes occur in sequence and in isolation, with managers using one predominant form of conflict resolution behavior.
Findings – The findings are two-fold: first, the behavioral strategies adopted in the management of these conflicts will be highly complex and will be determined by a number of influencing factors; and second, this moves theory beyond the two dimensional duel concern perspective, in that the adaptable manager dealing with these multiple, simultaneous conflicts will also need to consider the possible implications of their chosen strategy along with the changing micro environment in which they operate. Originality/value – This paper adds value to the field of conflict theory by moving beyond two dimensions and exploring a sequential contingency perspective for conflict management within the organization. It argues that multiple conflict episodes can occur simultaneously, requiring managers to use differing
21,2
A re-evaluation of conflict theory for the management of multiple, simultaneous conflict episodes
186
Received 7 May 2008
Accepted 25 May 2009
James Speakman
IESEG School of Management, Catholic University of Lille, Lille, France, and
Lynette Ryals
Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK
Abstract
Purpose – This conceptual paper aims to draw upon recent complexity and organizational psychology literature to examine conflict episodes, exploring the limitations of the predominant research paradigm that treats conflict episodes as occurring in sequence, as discrete isolated incidents.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper addresses a long-standing issue in conflict management research, which is that the predominant typology of conflict is confusing. The complexity perspective challenges the fundamental paradigm, which has dominated research in the conflict field, in which conflict episodes occur in sequence and in isolation, with managers using one predominant form of conflict resolution behavior.
Findings – The findings are two-fold: first, the behavioral strategies adopted in the management of these conflicts will be highly complex and will be determined by a number of influencing factors; and second, this moves theory beyond the two dimensional duel concern perspective, in that the adaptable manager dealing with these multiple, simultaneous conflicts will also need to consider the possible implications of their chosen strategy along with the changing micro environment in which they operate. Originality/value – This paper adds value to the field of conflict theory by moving beyond two dimensions and exploring a sequential contingency perspective for conflict management within the organization. It argues that multiple conflict episodes can occur simultaneously, requiring managers to use differing
References: Amason, A. and Sapienza, H. (1997), “The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict”, Journal of Management, Vol Amason, A.C. (1996), “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Bodtker, A.M. and Jameson, J.K. (2001), “Emotion in conflict formation and its transformation: application to organizational conflict management”, International Journal of Conflict Bradford, K.D., Stringfellow, A. and Weitz, B.A. (2004), “Managing conflict to improve the effectiveness of retail networks”, Journal of Retailing, Vol Cheng, C. (1995), “Multi-level gender conflict analysis and organizational change”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol De Dreu, C.K.W. (1997), “Productive conflict: the importance of conflict management and conflict issue”, in De Dreu, C.K.M Euwema, M.C., Van de Vliert, E. and Bakker, A.B. (2003), “Substantive and relational effectiveness of organizational conflict behavior”, International Journal of Conflict Ford, N.M., Walker, O.C. Jr and Churchill, G.A. (1975), “Expectation specific measures of the intersender conflict and role ambiguity experienced by salesmen”, Journal of Business Jameson, J.K. (1999), “Toward a comprehensive model for the assessment and management of intraorganizational conflict: developing the framework”, International Journal of Conflict Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E. and Veenstra, C. (1999), “How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams”, Journal of Management, Vol Jehn, K.A. (1995), “A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol Jehn, K.A. (1997), “A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol Jehn, K.A. and Chatman, J.A. (2000), “The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Barry, B. and Minton, J. (2003), Essentials of Negotiation, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, Singapore. Medina, J.M., Dorado, M.A., de Cisneros, I.F.J., Arevalo, A. and Munduate, L. (2004), “Behavioral sequences in the effectiveness of conflict management”, Psychology in Spain, Vol Munduate, L., Ganaza, J., Peiro, J.M. and Euwema, M. (1999), “Patterns of styles in conflict management and effectiveness”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol Nicotera, A.M. (1993), “Beyond two dimensions: a grounded theory model of conflict-handling behavior”, Management Communication Quarterly, Vol Olekalns, M., Smith, P.L. and Walsh, T. (1996), “The process of negotiating: strategy and timing as predictors of outcomes”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Pinkley, R.L. and Northcraft, G.B. (1994), “Conflict frames of reference: implications for dispute processes and outcomes”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol Pondy, L.R. (1966), “A systems theory of organizational conflict”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol Pondy, L.R. (1967), “Organizational conflict: concepts and models”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol Pondy, L.R. (1989), “Reflections on organizational conflict”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol Pondy, L.R. (1992a), “Historical perspectives and contemporary updates”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol Pondy, L.R. (1992b), “Reflections on organizational conflict”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol Priem, R.L. and Price, K.H. (1991), “Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making”, Group & Putnem, L. and Poole, M.S. (1987), “Conflict and negotiation”, in Jablin, F.M., Putnam, L.L., Roberts, K.H Reid, D.A., Pullins, E.B., Plank, R.E. and Buehrer, R.E. (2004), “Measuring buyers’ perceptions of conflict in business-to-business sales interactions”, The Journal of Business & Industrial Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C. and Van Dyne, L. (1993), “Complex interdependence in task-performing groups”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol Sessa, V. (1996), “Using perspective taking to manage conflict and affect in teams”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol Schwenk, C.R. (1990), “Effects of devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: a meta-analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol Sheppard, B.H. (1992), “Conflict research as Schizophrenia: the many faces of organizational conflict”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M. and Frey, D. (2002), “Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking”, Simons, T.L. and Peterson, R.S. (2000), “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Sternberg, R.J. and Soriano, L.J. (1984), “Styles of conflict resolution”, Journal of Personality and