Preview

Absolutism DBQ

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism DBQ
Mike Chang 11/1/08 Mrs. Lee Global DBQ

In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two main forms of government. The two main forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these types of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism was the most effective type of government during that time period. Absolutism is when the ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people of their nation. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them instead of a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.

Two forms of government that were used during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of governments were effective in there own ways, absolutism was more effective. Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" which was a simply a textbook on monarchy. He said the best way to rule was to be feared. Machiavelli wrote in his book that "Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it" (Document 1). King James I also believed that absolutism was the way to rule. He thought that kings were like gods therefore he believed in divine right. Divine Right is the authority to rule directly from God. "The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). Another person that ruled in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He felt that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He was not very popular because John Locke overshadowed him. Hobbes wrote a book named "Leviathan" says that life would be constant warfare without a strong government to control

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the more common forms of government was absolutism. Rulers believed they should have complete control over the country. An excerpt in document 1 states that Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be aggressive and feared and thought that the only way the citizen would follow his rule was if he emulated his power and social status. He thought that if he showed kindness and generosity that he would be overthrown. Most of the monarchs believed in divine right, this meant that they thought that they were chosen by God to rule. One of rulers that believed in divine right was King James 1st, his ideas were expressed in document 2 one of his quotes: “….God has the power…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism dbq

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history autocratic rulers have come to power. Autocratic rulers control the power of the nobility, control religious authorities as well as, use armies to expand their borders and make laws. These leaders have tried to control their countries. The actions taken to control their countries helped and hurt the countries. Two such leaders, Czar Peter the Great of Russia and King Louis the XIV of France were both examples of Autocrat whose actions helped and hurt their countries. Peter the Great’s autocratic actions like taking control by expanding and westernizing his country and building a new capital, both helped and hurt his country. Louis XIV was another example of an autocratic ruler who actions like building a magnificent palace in order to control the nobility and thinking that France revolved around him, both helped and hurt his country.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three major forms of government in the early modern period in Europe could be summarized by looking where the power is centralized. The first form, Absolutism also known as divine right kingship, is centralized to where the power was held by the Monarch and Monarch alone. The second form, Constitutionalism, is centralized by the idea of limited power. The existence of a fundamental governing law that made no one body of the ruling government, too powerful. The third and final form, Enlightened Despotism, is similar to Absolutism but it had limiting ideas which conflicted each other, they limited their growth with the rigid class structures and liberal ideas that were not implemented efficiently. The governments of the early modern period…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people in Europe preferred absolutist systems and many people also preferred the constitutional systems. Thomas Hobbes justified absolute authority and Locke provided the basis for constitutionalism. The both of them argued that all…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 17th century two future rulers, Peter the Great of Russia and Louis XIV of France, were born who would push absolutism to new heights. Absolutism is a form of government where all the power is in the hands of one individual. Absolute monarchies are the most common form of absolutism.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there were various forms of government, including democracy and absolutism. Not only is this an important topic because it deals with the government, but it also deals with the citizens and their perception of the government. However, at this time democracy was a better form of government because the people share the power with the government, the person in power does not have absolute power, and it protects the rights of the people.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is a concept that rose during the late sixteenth century and early seventeenth century. The idea of Absolutism consisted of a belief that each country has a divine right from G-d to rule. Within each country, an absolute monarch rose to power. Each absolute monarch was economically in charge of taxes and politically in charge of mobilizing an army. Over time, Absolutism transforms into a social movement in which a king is in total control of his kingdom economically and politically.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbe’s argued that ordinary people were incapable of governing themselves and should willingly submit to the sovereignty of a supreme ruler. They carry out the ruler’s demands, and the ruler, in return, agrees to keep the peace. This type of political theory is know as Absolutism.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism

    • 717 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Prussia is not a state which possesses an army, rather an army that possesses a state.”…

    • 717 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism Vs Democracy

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    Democracy was the more effective form of government for the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe. With absolutism, a colony can refuse to obey any laws or commands once things are not going according to plan into making their nation powerful. A ruler can abuse their power, and start becoming selfish or injusticely in order to keep having more power. There is a possibility for an absolute monarch succeeding into increasing and strengthening the power of their empire. However it is also likely for a ruler to a mistake after another, making the empire taking matters into their own hands.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism in France

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the reign of the Bourbon dynasty of France, a distinct form of government known as absolutism developed, hoping to counteract the intensifying religious conflicts and the social fragmentation in Europe. Within the rule of the great Henry IV of Navarre, his son Louis XIII, and the prominent Louis XIV, the supreme authority of the monarch of France expanded exponentially, bringing about stability, prosperity, and public order. And through an unsettled, irresolute, and altering relationship with the nobility, the kings of France were able to exercise their immeasurable power over their kingdoms.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes + Machiavelli

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Two of the greatest philosophers of all time are Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli. Hobbes was born in 1588 in England, when absolutism was taking hold in Europe. His most famous work was "Leviathan", written in 1651. Hobbes discussed the ideal state and innate laws of man and nature, among other things. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, a time when his home country was ruled mostly by foreign powers. His hometown, Florence, was still independent. Machiavelli's most famous work, "The Prince", tells of his ideal state and ideal ruler. Machiavelli goes on to describe the perfect prince, a picture of cruelty and cunning. Though both genius philosophers, their views differ greatly. Hobbes believed in a minimalist government where the state only interfered with the lives of the citizens when it had to. The ideal kingdom was the kingdom of God, in Hobbes' mind. In Machiavelli's "The Prince", he describes his ideal government with a strong monarch, and fearful subjects. In Hobbes' system, a close relationship was kept with God, while in Machiavelli's reason was the only rule. The most important and most dealt-with area of dialogue is the "ideal" government.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays