Preview

A Westchester Farmer Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Westchester Farmer Analysis
A Full Vindication of the measures of Congress
"A full vindication of measures of Congress" is one of Alexander Hamilton's first published letters, in response to the letter of " A Westchester Farmer", which accuses the actions of the first Continental Congress. Hamilton starts the letter with defending decisions and actions of the Congress, and disproving the "Farmer's" accusations by logically and precisely responding to his main points, with facts and examples. Then, he proves how the Congress has recommended the only effective way to secure Colonial security and establish a solid future, mainly by boycotting all trades with the British empire and gaining independence. Hamilton then, addresses the farmers of New York directly and talks them
…show more content…
Colonial farmers play a vital role in shaping the Colonial economics platform, before and after the measures taken by the Continental Congress, and Hamilton deeply realizes that, therefore tries to convince them to agree with the Congress.
First, Hamilton tells the farmers that the British Parliament is trying to ruin their lives and their children's, by forcing them to pay heavy taxes. He believes the English men have no interest in the farmers' wellbeing and would take their properties and lands whenever they please, once they become their masters. In addition, Hamilton tells the farmers that none of them should choose to become a slave! Choosing to become a slave sounds ironic, since no man would ever "choose" to live under horrible conditions with no liberty or right. Therefore, Hamilton adds: " The only distinction between freedom and slavery consists in this: In the former state a man is governed by the laws to which he has given his consent, either in person or by his representative; in the latter, he is governed by the will of another. In the one case, his life and
…show more content…
Being a Protestant, Hamilton mentions how the British Parliament let the Popery system continue in Canada, and didn’t stop it only to maintain their power. Hamilton tries to convince the farmers that the British Parliament is not their friend, because of the encouragement they gave to the Popery. Recent Religious compromises of the British government, especially in Canada, play a strong role in Hamilton's negative Perception of the British Parliament. That is, by introducing “arbitrary power and Popery”, the latter which Hamilton considers as enemy to Protestantism, the British Parliament is, by settling with the people of Canada, disregarding some major values only in order to maintain its power and control over them. Hamilton even makes the farmers feel guilty if they "neglect what [they] owe to God" (Hamilton, 31). Although Hamilton repeatedly encourages freedom and its necessity, but apparently freedom is only for land and life. When it comes to religion he isn't willing to accept the freedom in religion and has strong opinions against anyone who isn't Protestant. Hamilton is worried that the British Parliament would establish Popery in New York or other colonies, and the colonies would put "[themselves] in the way of losing everything that is precious" (Hamilton, 33). This shows that in that time, religious people were strict and couldn’t stand different

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Farmers dbq

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the late nineteenth century, twenty years after the Homestead Act, farmers used their land in the western plains to produce both crops and profits. The farmers of this time struggled in the agricultural way of life by facing economic and political obstacles that were impossible to avoid, requiring them to do something about their complaints. Although the farmers had plausible arguments for most of their criticisms, their beliefs of the silver standard and overproduction sometimes could not be backed up. However, farmers continued to struggle between inevitable issues like the currency debate, constant debt and rising costs.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French lost the entirety of their North American possessions after the French and Indian War, which led to numerous new possessions for the British (Doc A). The British and American colonies political views differed greatly because of the effect of salutary neglect. The colonies were not accustomed to direct taxation or strict governing rules. The Proclamation of 1763 was one of the first forms of direct control imposed by the British. The proclamation called for a movement of all settlers to stay east of the Appalachian Mountains. Many settlers ignored the proclamation, but nevertheless, it began a short era of direct control under the British. The British council determined that the American colonies needed to be taxed in order to raise revenue and regulate trade (Doc F). The council’s motives led to direct taxes on the colonies such as the Sugar Act, Currency Act, and Stamp Act. Benjamin Franklin attempted to represent the colonies in London as he partook in the repeal of the Stamp Act (Doc G). He wrote letters to John Highs, detailing his efforts to repeal the act and the dire need for the colonies to stay firm and loyal towards the crown. Many colonists did not waver from their loyalty towards the British Crown, such as Reverend Thomas Barnard. In one of his man sermons to Massachusetts, Barnard emphasizes how their mother country had protected them from turmoil and how she should be honored and served for her great services (Doc E). The differing political views were…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dinner begins with Thomas Jefferson’s account of the Compromise of 1790. Jefferson explains that Hamilton comes to him discouraged that his fiscal policy was being blocked, with most of that opposing force coming from Madison. In order to help them resolve this issue, Jefferson invited them to a dinner, where a compromise was reached; Madison would leave the assumption bill to its fate, and Hamilton would ensure that the Nation’s capital would lie along the Potomac. The assumption bill passed, and construction for the nation’s capital began along the Potomac. However, Jefferson’s story precipitates several question: was the affair really that simple, and why were these three men so fearful of the nation’s future? Ellis takes us through…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author continues developing a supportive narrative for his thesis claiming that farmers’ played a role in deciding to declare independence. As He continues to unfold the drama of farmers ‘refusal to export tobacco and refusal to sell to Chesapeake buyers as a means to raise prices for tobacco in order to reconcile debt payments. Evidence provided by the author argues that farmers decided to work with the elites, their," gentry’s association…became one of the vehicles that carried the thirteen colonies into the American Revolution"(129). Although some evidence of the merchants’ role is mentioned, such as their refusal to discontinue retailing imported goods and conveniences more information is needed to fully assist audiences with understanding the connection to influencing the war. Meanwhile, Professor Holton’s, solid presentation of Governor Dunmore’s makeshift emancipation offer for slaves in exchange for service in his army provides clarity about the slaves’ involvement in contributing to an already chaotic environment. Also, sources provide information about the attitudes toward blacks and the severity of punishment they endured for escaping which acts as a backdrop for the slavery uprising…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton believed that power was necessary for doing a thing. For example, power was needed in collecting taxes. Chapter 34 of Hamilton’s writings in Federalist paper is more about the concurrent jurisdiction, which covers the matter of taxes. It was argued that the concurrent jurisdiction played and important role by the power of revenue raising. Hamilton argued higher tariffs could affect consumers, because he believed that higher tariffs meant higher prices. Besides, higher prices would create monopoly that would put the market in a difficult situation. Hamilton’s altogether vision, which was seen as impossible by him, because it was also impossible to have different, trade members and occupation. He argued that the government should consider merchants as patron and friend. The most important thing was to keep taxes low, because it was the only boundary between the poorest to the wealthiest. Hamilton was disappointed about the poll taxes, because he believed that poll taxes should be imposed when…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton (2004), Ron Chernow tackles the errand of depicting America's most questionable Founding Father. The book gives an expansive perspective of the scene of early America, with unique accentuation on Hamilton's accomplishments and his relationship to certain Founders.Before understanding this book, my contemplations concurred with the prevalent picture of Hamilton as a splendid however tyrannical man who was as often as possible required in outrages or in clashes with different Founders. I heard that he pushed government, protectionism, mercantilism, a solid government, and a national bank. I additionally realized that he had something to do with the Constitution and thought of a portion of The Federalist Papers. I realized…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton believed that the upper-class ought to have a stake in the government, as they did during Shay’s Rebellion. “Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share in the government…as they cannot receive any advantage by a change, they therefore will ever maintain good government.” Hamilton would have argued that the elite legislature in Massachusetts was in fact acting in the best interest of the state as they “cannot receive any advantage,” and as such there was no need to rebel. Hamilton’s trust in the upper-class, and general distrust of the mass of the people, meant that he would have certainly been opposed to the…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first level of the FFA is the local level. The local level is our school, Baren County High. Our local level belongs to a larger group called the Chapter. Our chapter is Barren County. There are 12 local levels in the Barren County Chapter. The next level is the Regoinal level. The Regional level is a bunch of the chapters from one part of the state. The regional level is then brought up with the other regional levels that make up the state. The state is one of the 54 states of the National Level(including the USA states, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico). There are over 450,000 members in the FFA from the USA.…

    • 252 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideal American republic for Hamilton from Johnson perspective is that Hamilton created a scheme in order to run the country. The scheme was helpful to America because as he predicted America was able to borrow money more cheaply. The Debt-funding was the first policy drafted by Hamilton. He also spoke about implemented measures for individuals who tried to rebel against taxation. Hamilton got the militia to dissolve the rebellion to basically prove the government is not in control. In Zinn’s argument about Hamilton, he stated that Hamilton suggested that there should be a president and senate for life and the government should a line itself with the richest element of the society.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson had a good point showing that the rich and wealthy and wellborn should not rule, and that was a big point of Hamilton’s I did not believe in but, overall Hamilton’s views on who should govern passed Jefferson. For example, Hamilton wanted to raise voting qualifications meaning he didn’t want it to be so easy for anyone to vote, and that is how it should be, not everyone should be able to vote, it should be a privilege, and having anyone be able to vote like Jefferson believed, could hurt the government and who runs…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So after that he had been noticed, he had to go to the constitutional convention so not only he went he has been asked about what should the constitution have. So he had made some propositions for the constitution. During that time he wrote a paper on all of them in the “ Plan of the Union.” (Hamilton 1) This paper shows that the propositions that he had made when they asked. There are 12 things that not only include the right of the people but also the laws of the land. That would mean that all people has equal protection including the president, senate, and everyone else. As you can see that Hamilton really learned that freedmen should have full citizenship rights, that took two years to finally understand that you can live without people doing your…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrible things are no fun. Early in the book, Hamilton himself says “God, I wish there was a war!” (Miranda, 23). But if I had been in the situation, I would have wished for the opposite, for a peaceful solution between us and Great Britain. Besides just being generally bad, war is also very risky. If I had been living in the Revolutionary era, I wouldn’t be so eager to turn into another casualty. Hamilton is ambitious and wants to secure his legacy in history. He’s fine with martyrdom. I’m not. That goal isn’t relevant for me. I would value my life above my legacy.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, a political mastermind, was the first leader of the Federalists. Like him self, the Federalist followers were wealthy land owning men who were powerful and held high jobs within the cities. They believed that industries of mercantilism and business were going to be significant contributors to the success of America’s future. Therefor Federalism was very popular in New England and the North part of the United States because of the popularity of “big business” in those areas. In fear of getting in the middle of a war with another country they did not want any ties with any other countries, but to trade with them. Hamilton and his followers also believed in a very strong central government. They wanted a secure executive branch and trusted it as the key for a strong nation. However, they followed the Constitution, but if they found the need to change anything, and it was necessary and proper and would benefit the nation, they were ok to make the change. The federalists were very strong supporters of the British. Hamilton felt that they should not get involved with the war between France and Great Britain, this however angered the French because without them, they believed, America would have lost the Revolutionary war.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Ron Chernow is trying to inform the reader of what life was like for Alexander Hamilton. Chernow provides the reader with information about Hamilton’s childhood, marriage, and political career. Chernow wrote that Hamilton grew up in a society where slavery was accepted and people had very poor morals. For example, Rachel Faucette, Hamilton’s mother, died two years after his father abandoned his family. Shortly after his mother’s death, Hamilton’s cousin, who was also his guardian, committed suicide and his aunt, uncle, and grandmother died. Hamilton had a very rough youth because he suffered many losses young but no matter what he went through, he rose above it all. A successful merchant took him in and eventually Hamilton became…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays