A Second Democritus: The Two View Of The Indians
2/14/11 - Casey Ward
Turned in soft copy by deadlne
The Two View of the Indians:
Juan Gines de Sepulveda was a Spanish priest, theologian, and philosopher who wrote “A Second Democritus: on the just causes of the war with the Indians”. Sepulveda is most widely known for his involvement with Bartolome de la Casas in the debate at Valladolid in 1550 where he defended the position of the colonists by arguing that the Native Americans were barbaric, inferior, and incapable of self-governance. He believed that the Indians should be “natural slaves” and that violence was needed to make them be amendable to conversion. Sepulveda stated that, "Those whose condition is such that their function is the use of their bodies and nothing better can be expected of them, those, I say, are slaves of nature. It is better for them to be ruled thus." Juan Sepulveda is known as the ‘father of modern racism’ and the adversary of Bartolome de las Casas. …show more content…
He later changed his ways, gave up his slaves, and started to defend the rights and treatment of the Indians to King Charles. In the debate at Valladolid, he defended the treatment of the Native Americans and believed they should be treated like any other people in Spain. He based much of his defense from his faith and of the teaching of the Bible, but a large part was due to his realization through his own involvement in Indian slavery that it was unjust and
Turned in soft copy by deadlne
The Two View of the Indians:
Juan Gines de Sepulveda was a Spanish priest, theologian, and philosopher who wrote “A Second Democritus: on the just causes of the war with the Indians”. Sepulveda is most widely known for his involvement with Bartolome de la Casas in the debate at Valladolid in 1550 where he defended the position of the colonists by arguing that the Native Americans were barbaric, inferior, and incapable of self-governance. He believed that the Indians should be “natural slaves” and that violence was needed to make them be amendable to conversion. Sepulveda stated that, "Those whose condition is such that their function is the use of their bodies and nothing better can be expected of them, those, I say, are slaves of nature. It is better for them to be ruled thus." Juan Sepulveda is known as the ‘father of modern racism’ and the adversary of Bartolome de las Casas. …show more content…
He later changed his ways, gave up his slaves, and started to defend the rights and treatment of the Indians to King Charles. In the debate at Valladolid, he defended the treatment of the Native Americans and believed they should be treated like any other people in Spain. He based much of his defense from his faith and of the teaching of the Bible, but a large part was due to his realization through his own involvement in Indian slavery that it was unjust and