A Quilt Of A Country Summary
Looking at two similar, yet different, articles “A Quilt of a Country”, by Anna Quindlen, and the other, “The Immigrant Contribution”, by John F. Kennedy. It may have been hard, but we can tell some important things to you that you might have missed. While reading these articles, we found big differences between the two. Some people might say these are too similar to tell a difference. Well, let me to you something, both articles seem very similar with a glance, however, they both have many differences that can be seen if you look hard enough. Let’s compare and contrast these relations and divergences that we chose from these writings. Both authors have the same ideas and like to share on how they write it. One of these ideas is that they both show mutual encouragement for unity. This similarity should be rather easy to spot. The fact that both Quindlen and Kennedy have the same ideas, and express them rather roughly the same, they can be compared with some effort. An excellent example that we found in Quindlen’s writing is this quote: “One of
…show more content…
Let’s take a look at some that we found. While looking at both articles, we found that Quinlan's article talks more about terrorism, and Kennedy’s article talks about people hoping to climb the social ladder. By terrorism, we mean events like 9/11, and Quindlen even talks about the world wars, the cold war, even communism, ere she talks about this act of agroterrorism (Quindlen 15). For Kennedy’s side, we found that he talks more about the spirit of equality in all immigrants and where they came from. Once again, there are multiple different occurrences of this, so sourcing them all would be a bit of a pain. Kennedy never talks about wars, or terrorism, or anything of the sort. The same could go for Quindlen, as she never talks about the wishes of the people she is
Let’s take a look at some that we found. While looking at both articles, we found that Quinlan's article talks more about terrorism, and Kennedy’s article talks about people hoping to climb the social ladder. By terrorism, we mean events like 9/11, and Quindlen even talks about the world wars, the cold war, even communism, ere she talks about this act of agroterrorism (Quindlen 15). For Kennedy’s side, we found that he talks more about the spirit of equality in all immigrants and where they came from. Once again, there are multiple different occurrences of this, so sourcing them all would be a bit of a pain. Kennedy never talks about wars, or terrorism, or anything of the sort. The same could go for Quindlen, as she never talks about the wishes of the people she is