A Memoir By The Chevalier De Seingalt
The article claims that, A memoir by the Chevalier de Seingalt is distorted and falsified by himself, to present himself as a more of the glamorous person, and provides the reasons of support. However, The professor refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article posits that, in his memoir Chevalier, claims that he was very wealthy person, and spent his time lavishly and more he spent on gamblilng, and great deal in parties, Yet he there is evidence to prove that, he lended some money from the Swiss merchant. On contary, the professor explains that he had an assets, in order to convert them to real money; lending money was his interim plan. nonetheless, there was an evidence to prove that he was a wealthy person indeed.
Secondly, The artcile posits that, the Chevalier, mentions about the conversations between himself, and the famous writer the Voltaire. However, critics do support that he may knew him, but conversations are quite questionable as of the memoir written by himself was later many years after the conversation. However, the professor condems this by saying that, the Chevalier, always maintained a journal, and people closely accompanied by him, confirms that virtue of journal he used to refer, when writing the memoir. …show more content…
In the memoir he wrote that he escaped from the venice prision with a adventurous strategy, but article opposes that and mentions that he was a very powerful connnectiona and with help of bribe he might have esacaped. On contrary the professor refutes that, by saying that, there were other influential personals, also accompanied him as a prisoners, but why not some of them couldn't manage a escape. And more over there is a document eveidence by, the venice governemnt that, they made some repair works, the Chavlier
First, the article posits that, in his memoir Chevalier, claims that he was very wealthy person, and spent his time lavishly and more he spent on gamblilng, and great deal in parties, Yet he there is evidence to prove that, he lended some money from the Swiss merchant. On contary, the professor explains that he had an assets, in order to convert them to real money; lending money was his interim plan. nonetheless, there was an evidence to prove that he was a wealthy person indeed.
Secondly, The artcile posits that, the Chevalier, mentions about the conversations between himself, and the famous writer the Voltaire. However, critics do support that he may knew him, but conversations are quite questionable as of the memoir written by himself was later many years after the conversation. However, the professor condems this by saying that, the Chevalier, always maintained a journal, and people closely accompanied by him, confirms that virtue of journal he used to refer, when writing the memoir. …show more content…
In the memoir he wrote that he escaped from the venice prision with a adventurous strategy, but article opposes that and mentions that he was a very powerful connnectiona and with help of bribe he might have esacaped. On contrary the professor refutes that, by saying that, there were other influential personals, also accompanied him as a prisoners, but why not some of them couldn't manage a escape. And more over there is a document eveidence by, the venice governemnt that, they made some repair works, the Chavlier