Preview

A Change Of Heart About Animals Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Change Of Heart About Animals Essay
Many people believe that animals have feelings and that they are able to feel what a human feels such love, suffering, stress even some people think that we share similar characteristics. in the article "A Change of Heart About Animals '' the author Jeremy Rifkin argument that animals are the same as human beings and that we should also treat them with love and respect. For some reasons, activists and some law schools believe in animals rights and they want to protect animals but if there were a bill of rights for animals some certain things would change for a reason some would not be benefit from this. Pass a bill of right it is not a good idea because it would change many things.

Have you ever thought what would happen if there were an Animal's Bill of Right? Do you think would be the same what would happen if there were not animals in laboratories to test in them new medications. I do not think there will people willing to test in them new medications. Those things comes to mind while thinking about animals right.First I’m strongly against animals having a bill of rights because if people protect animals there would not be new medications for human beings. In the …show more content…
I maintain what I said which I totally disagree. There are some people not comfortable with the idea and projects in order to protects animals. In the article “ Of primates and personhood” by Ed Yong talks about some projects about apes basically talks how “ Great Ape Project” was established in 1993 it demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for chimpanzees and apes,gorillas bonobos and orangutans.” Yong state in his article “ i do think we have special obligations to the great apes as our closest relatives, but if we give rights to apes, what would be the compelling reason not to give rights to monkeys ,dogs rats, and so on” imagine give rights to this animals when they are not similar to us do not have
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin
    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin

    I am writing to you regarding Mr. Jeremy Rifkin’s article.”A Change Of Heart About Animals” I personally didnt agree with much of what Rifkin said.To me he is a man who just talks and doesnt really go in to depth or think what hes trying to say through.He reccomended we give pigs toys so that they would be more happier and less agressive.Mr. Bob Stevens on the other hand had an amazing argument to what Mr.Rifkin was saying it was outstanding.Rifkin makes an argument saying that we should be more sympathetic on how we treat our animals.Logically there is million of kids in the world who do not have toys but have familes and can not afford them.So there is a dirty pig who is destin for slaughter that is given the oppurtunity to have toys,they…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Of Primates And Personhood Summary
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    Of Primates And Personhood Summary

    Summary Response In the article “Of Primates and Personhood” written by Ed Yong, demonstrates major developments between primatologist, biologists, and ethicists around the world. These major developments are a pending spanish law that would grant unprecedented protection toward great apes; Also, a recent extension to a swiss law that protects the dignity of organisms, and to redefine the meaning of human rights, and indeed whether such rights are the exclusive domain of humans. Furthermore, the Great Ape Project (GAP) has been established (1993). Not everyone had been comfortable with the GAP’s project, says Yong;…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

    After reading the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin . I conclude that Rifkin is really interested in the way animals feel and the research that proves animals are just like humans . He is persuading us to think that animals are just like us by giving lots of examples of animals having emotions just like humans do. There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Like the studies researchers have done on pigs, they need attention to stay happy because keeping them isolated or alone will make the pig feel depressed.I feel like animals should have their own rights because they are very intelligent and some, like Koko the gorilla, can communicate with humans. Betty and Abel the…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyzing Jeremy Rifkin's Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

    Animals should have a Bill of Rights because they have sentiment, feel suffering, and are being forced into excruciating procedures. Animals should have the potential to stand up for themselves and make their own decisions because they are just as superior as human beings. People of El Monte, I encourage you to vote yes to an animal bill of rights because it will help prolong the lives of animals…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Change Of Heart About Animals Rifkin Summary
    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Change Of Heart About Animals Rifkin Summary

    “100 Million animals are killed in U.S laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity driven experimentation, chemical, drug, food and cosmetic testing.” -peta.org. The Rifkin article discusses about the pain animals feel. According to Rifkin Animals feel the pain as if they were a human bean. Innocent animals are being killed each day just for the fun of it or for some kind product testing. He believes we ought to change the way we treat animals. The way we treat the animals has to be changed.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brief Summary Of The Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief Summary Of The Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Change Of Heart About Animals
    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Change Of Heart About Animals

    In the article “ A change of Heart about Animals” by Rifkin, he states “ They feel pain, suffer, and experiences stress, affection, excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals.” These characteristics are just like any human being they feel pain just as we feel pain, they suffer just like we do too therefore i agree that they should have the same rights as us humans. Although many other people might say they're just animals but they realize they are species just like us humans.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Change Of Heart About Animals
    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Change Of Heart About Animals

    Visualize having someone mistreat you because they don’t feel the pain they’re making you go through. As humans we are capable of letting others know when we are in pain and we are also capable of standing up for ourselves. Animals aren’t able to do that so they are treated unfairly, like if they didn’t feel any pain at all. Although many believe that animals shouldn’t be treated like humans, my goal is to convince my classmates that we should improve the way we treat animals.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Should Animals Have Rights?
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Should Animals Have Rights?

    Animals should not have rights also because animals don’t respect our rights. As humans if one…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Bill Of Rights For Animals Essay
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Bill Of Rights For Animals Essay

    Humans do not own the Earth. Animals are not obligated to provide them any services, despite the objections of many people. Animals are constantly poked, probed, or burned for the benefit of the human race. We are allowed medicines that cure or treat chronic illnesses due to the sacrifices made by animals, yet we treat them with disrespect because we see them as inferior. An Animal Bill of Rights is necessary. Animals should be protected as much as human beings are, because without them we may not even be alive. If an Animal Bill of Rights is the incentive for humans to treat animals with respect, then so be it.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Rights
    • 793 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Rights

    Animals on a daily basis all over the world are being mistreated and abused by many people that do not care for them. There are very few people attempting to protect these animals, whether they are domestic animals, farm animals, or wildlife animals. More attention should be drawn to the treatment of animals because even if we do have laws for animals and for their well being, many people still do not follow these laws. The laws already established for animals should be enforced, because I do agree that animals need protection, as in free from any harm done towards them purposely, but to have a Bill of Rights specifically made for animals seems extreme.…

    • 793 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    animal bor
    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    animal bor

    Entitling animals to a bill of rights would cause world-wide consequences. Animals should not be entitled to basic legal rights because it goes against human cultural traditions and raise prices for food. Furthermore, animal rights would effectively increase the prices of animal products and decrease the supply of food. On the other hand, animals should be protected against abuse that we humans inflict.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animals Right
    • 894 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Animals Right

    Some people believe that animals are humans’ friends. The other people might do not think so. Because people have different values of animals, the arguments are commenced. Since 1977, all of three philosophers, Peter Singer, Tom Regan and Carl Cohen have respectively written their work to declare the status of animals. On the one hand, according to Peter Singer’s “All Animals Are Equal(1977) ,” and Tom Regan’s “The Case for Animal Rights(1989),” they claim that people should give equal rights to animals as the way do for human beings, and treat all the animals in certain way no matter how the consequences are; On the other hand, in “The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research(1986),” Carl Cohen believes that animals have no rights because they are not a part of a group whose typical members are moral agents and able to respond to moral claims. Only human can be the top one of the living beings in the world. Then the other two consider this is a form of speciesism. To see how this long debate’s process, animals’ equal rights and speciesism are the focus. First of all, animals should have equal rights. Peter Singer starts to call for the equal rights for animals. A similarity can be found by Tom Regan. Regan presents the principle, “subject-of-a-life” as the basis of his case for the fundamental rights of animals. Once any being has complicated spiritual life, like desire, belief, memory, intention and a sense of the future, which is a subject of a life. Due to the fact that each subject of a life is an individual who worries and thinks about his or her life, that life is defined with inherent value. Indeed, Regan identifies that being is not important as the state, and concludes that all who have inherent value equally. Therefore, all animals’ equal right should be treated with respect. However, Cohen replies that "animals are not morally self-legislative, cannot possibly be members of a truly moral community…

    • 894 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics