8th Amendment Pros And Cons
The 8th Amendment talks about freedom of speech and freedom of living life. It is not true for everyone to live his/her life by his/her choice. When one ask someone, he/she will tell that they are in favor of equal rights for homosexuals. They will all say that gay should have the same rights in housing, jobs, and public accommodations and they should have equal access to government benefits and equal protection of the law. When someone ask them about gay marriage, all this talk of equality stops dead cold. Nearly three people in four in the U.S. oppose gay marriage, almost the same proportion as are otherwise supportive of gay rights. Additionally, many people continue to believe that homosexuality is about nothing but sex, considering it
…show more content…
Heterosexual persons have right to marry foreigners and live with their love one. If person is homosexual, he can not marry a same-sex partner from another county (Action Alert). No matter how long the couple has been together or how committed their relationship. It means that many same-sex national couples must live apart for long period of time, perhaps years or decades, until the foreign partner finds some other way to get a green card. The common argument is about the gay relationships are immoral. The freedom of religion implied the right to freedom from religion as well. The Bible has absolutely no standing in American law, and because it doesn 't, no one has the right to impose rules anyone else simply because of something they perceive to be mandated by the Bible. There should be a moot point, Separation of church and state. Some religious leaders are the most forceful advocates of same-sex marriage. In Hawaii alone, many faiths such as the Reform branches of Judaism, Quaker, Buddhist, Episcopal and many individual Protestant Congregations are involved in the pro-marriage campaign (Rotello …show more content…
If I may use an analogy, their argument is like a large bucket with a hole in the bottom, except the hole is as large as the top. Also, the bucket does not actually exist but they refuse to accept that and pour into it anyway. Before I started my research, I thought of a few reasons I thought I could go further with but when I tried to make them work, I could only find arguments against them. The reasons I thought same-sex marriage should not be legalized are because a majority of people voted against it, there would be less procreation, and it would complicate laws by redefining marriage.
In the United States of America, we have a democratic form of government. One of the most important parts of a democracy is the fact that we, the people, have a say in what happens by way of voting. One thing people get to have a say in is if each state will allow same-sex marriage. As of January 6, 2010, states that allow it are Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, and Vermont; California, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and
Washington DC do not allow same-sex marriage but do recognize marriages legally
Heterosexual persons have right to marry foreigners and live with their love one. If person is homosexual, he can not marry a same-sex partner from another county (Action Alert). No matter how long the couple has been together or how committed their relationship. It means that many same-sex national couples must live apart for long period of time, perhaps years or decades, until the foreign partner finds some other way to get a green card. The common argument is about the gay relationships are immoral. The freedom of religion implied the right to freedom from religion as well. The Bible has absolutely no standing in American law, and because it doesn 't, no one has the right to impose rules anyone else simply because of something they perceive to be mandated by the Bible. There should be a moot point, Separation of church and state. Some religious leaders are the most forceful advocates of same-sex marriage. In Hawaii alone, many faiths such as the Reform branches of Judaism, Quaker, Buddhist, Episcopal and many individual Protestant Congregations are involved in the pro-marriage campaign (Rotello …show more content…
If I may use an analogy, their argument is like a large bucket with a hole in the bottom, except the hole is as large as the top. Also, the bucket does not actually exist but they refuse to accept that and pour into it anyway. Before I started my research, I thought of a few reasons I thought I could go further with but when I tried to make them work, I could only find arguments against them. The reasons I thought same-sex marriage should not be legalized are because a majority of people voted against it, there would be less procreation, and it would complicate laws by redefining marriage.
In the United States of America, we have a democratic form of government. One of the most important parts of a democracy is the fact that we, the people, have a say in what happens by way of voting. One thing people get to have a say in is if each state will allow same-sex marriage. As of January 6, 2010, states that allow it are Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, and Vermont; California, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and
Washington DC do not allow same-sex marriage but do recognize marriages legally