Preview

8th Amendment Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
87 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
8th Amendment Case Study
The Carr brothers should have been sentenced separately and given two different hearings. The Eighth Amendment may be unclear whether defendants must be given an individualized trial or not but the court’s Eighth Amendment cases have often insisted that defendants must be given “individualized sentencing” in order for the jury to find “an individualized determination” and decide whether the death penalty is appropriate. The issue is that the court has never insisted for defendants to be sentenced by themselves, at their own hearing, without any co-defendants present.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most highly debated amendments of the United States Constitution is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has been disputed for hundreds of years on exactly of its exact true meaning. The United States Constitution wrote the Second Amendment as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This work POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment comprises solution of the following task: "What rights are protected by the 4th Amendment? Provide three concrete examples. Why are unreasonable searches forbidden? What factors determine whether a search is reasonable or not? Explain in 200…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article discusses the Eighth Amendment, which states that “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” According to the child rape statute in Louisiana, the death penalty or life imprisonment is being administered to convicted pedophiles, as such; research on mental abnormality, and Forensic Psychology to assess the punishment. The author of this article is Brian Sellers, BA, University of North Carolina, and works in the Department of Criminal Justice. As a knowledgeable individual of the law, he explored the pros and cons whether the death penalty is appropriate for pedophiles, hence the many studies being conducted to support his point. This article will highlight…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights were intended to protect Americans ' specific personal rights. The Founding Fathers recognized the importance of these rights and fought so that the people in the United States would have the independence that no other nation had known. These same men were well aware of the unavoidable sacrifices they were going to have to make. Listing every right that a person should possess was impossible to fit into ten amendments. Therefore, congress made the final two amendments in the Bill of Rights to be an all inclusive statute in an effort to prevent the United States government from discovering a loophole and gaining too much power. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments are the final two statutes in the Bill of Rights which outlines the limited control of the government and even more importantly the power of the people.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4th Amendment Case Study

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the two-fold requirement discussed in Katz v. United States, for analyzing when a search occurs under the 4th Amendment.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Case

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the fourteenth amendment it states no person is allowed to be denied life, in that case, should we have the right to die? In 1983, the supreme court ruled in favor of Nancy Cruzan, in the case of Nancy vs. Missouri, by vote of the Supreme Court 5-4. Yes, the Supreme Court made the right decision. My reasonings are because Nancy Cruzan died by choice.Next, a few days before she died nineteen doctors actually tried to reinsert the tube. Lastly, Missouri life support were taking away her right to pursue happiness.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Cruel and Unusual Punishment” Clause of the Eighth Amendment came from the English Bill of Rights that were adopted in 1689. This provision was written into the English Bill of Rights after Titus Otis, who lied causing many innocent people to be executed, was punished in a cruel and unusual way at the time. George Manson first used the cruel and unusual punishment clause in 1776 when he drafted the Declaration of Rights for the Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1791, the clause was added to the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. People feared that if this clause was not added that Congress would abuse its power and use cruel and unusual punishments as a tool to oppress them.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8th amendment

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment: It prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment. In the case of Atkins v. Virginia, the facts brought to the court was that the defendant, Daryl Atkins was tried for capital murder and sentenced to death for the shooting of a victim named Eric Nesbitt. Atkins had been smoking and drinking all day before he decided to walk to a convenient store and hold Nesbitt at gun point, upon Daryl’s dissatisfaction with the money he took, he kidnaped Nesbitt, taking him to an ATM to with drawl 200 dollars, along with a friend named William Jones, in Nesbitt’s car. When Daryl was satisfied with the money taken, he further continued his violence by driving Nesbitt to an isolated area, forcing him out of the vehicle, and then shot Nesbitt eight times killing him.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the constitution of the United States, the very documents that our nation is built upon, it is said that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, has three provisions” (Madison, 1778). Dzhokhar Tsarnaev would in turn later be sentenced to the death penalty for his crimes. However the questions still stand, is this the appropriate ruling? Or is capital punishment in violation of The Eighth Amendment? After all the killing and pain that he caused, the death penalty is nothing but the right punishment for a man so tarnished by evil. Tsarnaev does not stand alone in his crimes. Around the world and around our country people perform acts that should not be taken lightly, and should be punished heavily. Acts of terror, gruesome murders, rape, and a long list of other atrocious crimes should all be punishable by murder. While the system is not perfect, it is fixable and it is just. Justice is blind, but punishment…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Solitary confinement has been called into question as violating of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. The Eighth Amendment guarantee the protect from any cruel and unusual punishment. On Febuarary 24, 2012, a Russian immigrant named Viktor Bout challenged the use of solitary confinement during his time in Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). Bout was convicted on 2 November 2011, for conspiracy of attempting to smuggle arms to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) to kill U.S. citizens and delivery of anti-aircraft missiles. Once Bout was convicted he was held in solitary confinement for fourteen months. Judge Scheindlin (2012) ruled that,…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 7th Amendment

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Imagine being put into a situation where someone is in complete and utter control of your future and the severity of it. Now pretend they also are going to make it as severe as possible either because you are from a poor family, you have different religious or political views, or someone bribed them to make it as harsh as possible for you. This obviously is not fair and would cause any rational person to rebel against the system put in place for them; that is exactly what the colonists did when King George III took away the colonists’ right to trial by jury. Colonists knew the importance of the 7th Amendment because it prevented judicial bias and allowed…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ryan Douglas Roberts, 23, was found guilty of murdering a 13 - year old girl in Sacramento, California. According to an article written on September 21, 2015 by KCRA, Roberts faces a maximum potential sentence of 26 years to life in prison. This is exactly what the judicial system was made to do; convict those who have committed a crime. So why has the United States gone almost 200 years without being convicted of its most violent crime? Slavery in America began when the first African slaves were brought to the North American colony of Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619, to aid in the production of such lucrative crops as tobacco. And most aren't aware that slavery in this country didn't officially end until Dec. 6, 1865, the day the 13th Amendment…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pleading the Second Amendment to back up your gun rights is actually not a completely valid argument. Some people believe the Second Amendment not only allows them to own guns, but that the government cannot restrain those rights. This thought process on our rights in untrue not only in this circumstance but in all of our rights. The government can restrict our rights, and they do. The fact is, there are already limits on firearms by the government. For example: people cannot own machine guns, hand grenades, or shoulder-launched missiles and children, mentally ill, and felons cannot own any type of gun. The Supreme Court has refused to inspect the laws that bound the right to carry firearms and specific types…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the felony-murder law is unconstitutional and Tisons cannot be executed because if they did not plan to or actually kill anyone, under the 8th Amendment, their punishment given is cruel and unusual. In Enmund v. Florida, Earl Enmund was given the death sentence for being an accessory to two murders. He later appealed and the Supreme Court ruled it was unlawful and his death sentence was vacated. The defendant’s punishment must be proportionate to the crimes they have committed and those not actually performing the murders should not be given the death sentence. We want consistency in the Supreme Court and giving the death penalty for Ricky and Raymond Tison should be uplifted because it would just not be a reasonable punishment. The 14th Amendment states, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. In the Enmund case, Earl Enmund was not given the death sentence because he did not commit any murder. It is only fair, under these circumstances, that the Tison brothers shouldn’t be given the death sentence either because they did not commit any murders. Our defendants were accessories to the murders, they aided and embedded their father and his friend, they were involved in armed robbery, kidnapping, and car theft but due to the fact that there is no evidence that the defendants intended to, attempted to, or in fact kill anyone, they do not deserve the death penalty under these conditions. We want to honor the 8th and 14th Amendment and keep uniformity in this country and that is why these two men should not receive the death sentence. There is no question these two brothers should be punished and that is why a life sentence without possibility of parole is a more…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays