Thousands wrongly sectioned under mental health act following 'technical error'
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt told Parliament that thousands of Britain's most vulnerable patients have been locked up on the say so of doctors
By JEROME TAYLOR,REPORTER
Monday 29 October 2012
The Government has admitted that it will have to take the extraordinary step of bringing in emergency retrospective legislation after more than 5,000 people were wrongly sectioned under the mental health act over the past ten years because of a technical error.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt told Parliament that thousands of Britain's most vulnerable patients have been locked up on the say so of doctors who, despite having the requisite medical knowledge, were not legally allowed to make such a decision.
The error will require immediate retrospective legislation to avoid a deluge of legal complaints whilst a review has been ordered to find out what went wrong.
The Department of Health insists that no patients have been wrongly sectioned in clinical terms and that the doctors behind the decisions had the correct professional qualifications.
Under the Mental Health Act those who are sectioned for their own or society's safety are done so with the authorisation of a doctor who has to be approved by the Secretary
of State. In recent years the Health Secretary has delegated responsibility for approving doctors to the 10 Strategic Health Authorities that cover England.
However four authorities - North East, Yorkshire and Humber, West Midlands and East Midlands - delegated a further step top mental health trusts and then failed to sign off on the decisions they made, meaning they were effectively illegal.
In a statement to the Commons Mr Hunt said: "We believe that all the proper clinical processes were gone through when these patients were detained. They were detained by medically qualified doctors. We believe that no one is in hospital who shouldn't be and no patients have suffered because of this.
He added: "But for the avoidance of any remaining doubt, and in the interests of the safety of patients themselves, as well as the potential concerns of their families and the staff who care for them, we are introducing emergency legislation to clarify the position."
Andy Burnham, his opposite in the Labour party, said MPs would work with the Health Secretary in bringing in the emergency legislation but he warned: "There will be concerns about precedent - this the first time that the House has been presented with emergency legislation in this area which affects people's rights. The public will want to know that it is being used in exceptional circumstances as a last resort, not as a convenient means of correcting administrative failures."
Mental health charities reacted cautiously to the announcement saying that although the mistake was regrettable, they were assured by promises from the government that no-one had been sectioned falsely in clinical terms.
"Being involuntarily detained via the Mental Health Act is one of the most serious things that can happen to someone in terms of their mental health," said Paul Farmer, chief executive of Mind. "For this reason it is essential that the system works as it should, with safeguards in place to protect the rights of the person being detained. It is therefore regrettable that this mistake has been made and that it went unnoticed for so long."
Paul Jenkins, Chief Executive of Rethink Mental Illness added: "All of us need to know that if we were ever ill enough to be sectioned, we would be treated according to the proper processes. At this stage, we have no reason to think that anyone has been detained who should not have been, even though the correct procedures have not been followed. We believe that the Department of Health and Strategic Health Authorities are taking swift action and we will continue to monitor the situation."
Marjorie Wallace chief executive of the mental health charity SANE,added: "It is a matter of some concern that the procedures for something as sensitive as being sectioned have not been followed in so many cases. At the moment we have the Health Secretary's assurance that no-one has been detained unnecessarily, and must hope that these errors are correctly swiftly so that confidence in the system can be preserved. This is particularly important when an individual is placed in the care and authority of the state."
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Mental Capacity Act (2005) - The Mental Capacity Act 2005 for England and Wales received Royal Assent on 7 April 2005 and came into force in 2007…
- 8204 Words
- 33 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There was no action taken against these complaints because the police involved, took the word of what the staff said at Winterbourne View hospital over what the people in their care reported.…
- 803 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The CQC did a nationwide check on facilities owned by the same company, Castlebeck Care – as a result three more institutions have been closed. The CQC reported a "systemic failure to protect people or to investigate allegations of abuse"…
- 1012 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1.1 Case Study JOHN LITTLE John Little is a 69-year-old man living within an Enhanced Sheltered Accommodation Housing unit in Glasgow, where he has been resident for several years. I have changed the name of the individual to protect his identity in line with the (Data Protection Act 1998, 2017). Before the unit John lived in his own home in the same area of Glasgow, that he previously shared with his parents until they both died, he has a brother with whom he speaks with once or twice a month due to the fact he lives in Australia. John’s brother Charlie has not been home to Scotland for over twenty years making it hard for John to maintain a proper relationship with him. At the age of 18 John was diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia, throughout the rest of his adult life John has battled with this illness and needs regular routine support to help meet all his basic needs…
- 1268 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
This recent ruling further mandates that we, as human service workers, have a duty to not only warn, but a duty to protect a potential victim from the intentions of the client / patient. This is a legal way to not be bound by confidentiality, when another human beings life is in danger. Not only do we now have a way to protect, we are now legally and ethically obligated to follow through on notifications and the expectations are that all staff will abide by this new ruling.…
- 363 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are 60 mental health trusts in England. Patients normally access the services of mental health trusts through their GP or a stay in hospital. The trust works alongside other trust as well as the local authorities and voluntary organisation to provide care. The Children’s…
- 1743 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Unit Title: Enable rights and choices of individuals with dementia whilst minimising risks Unit sector reference: DEM 304 Level: 3 Credit value: 4 Guided learning hours: 26 Unit expiry date: 31/01/2015 Unit accreditation number: A/601/9191 Unit purpose and aim This unit is about developing the learners’ knowledge, understanding and skill of enabling the rights and choices of the individual with dementia whilst minimising risks. Learning Outcomes…
- 1003 Words
- 11 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Staff at Winterbourne care home were using unsafe practices, They were caught on CCTV slapping vulnerable residents, soaking them in water and trapping them under chairs, staff were caught physically abusing these residents as well as emotionally and verbally abusing them by taunting and swearing at them. The individuals were not able to defend themselves, this is an abuse of power and trust. Winterbourne were putting profits before humanity, it was run with a view to profit and with a lack of interest to its residents or staff.…
- 482 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The purpose of the act is to allow action to be taken in necessary situations to make sure that people with mental health difficulties including learning difficulties get the care as well as the treatment they need for their health, safety including the safety of others. However, the way it promotes anti-discriminatory practice is to ensure that all people with mental health difficulties or learning difficulties get the correct health care and treatment for their safety or others safety regardless of their disability. For example, in the community care the Meantal Health Act helps promote anti-discriminatory practice by giving the staff understanding of what to do if they are worried about a service users mental…
- 116 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
| The Mental Capacity Act 2005 prevents people who lack mental capacity from being mistreated or wilfully neglected.…
- 6605 Words
- 27 Pages
Better Essays -
The legal position of a formally confined patient is much easier to define – as their confinement is by definition – formal – all the formalities of the governing statutes must be followed. Greater confusion can therefore be found in the category of informal patients, where every situation may not be legislated for, and case law may not as yet have filled in the gaps.…
- 2131 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Therefore, in order for medical research to be approved to be experimented on a human subject, certain regulations must be considered. According to the Bioethics, Medical Ethics and Health Law, such regulations include, “1.) Experiments on human subjects are performed after experiments on animals have shown that a drug or technique has a reasonable possibility of benefiting human beings. In assessing the desirability and acceptability of the experiment, one should consider the severity of the disorder together with the possible side effects of the experimental treatment. 2.) Potential subjects must give informed consent. Informed consent is necessary for the personal autonomy of the subject. 3.) Researcher, as a physician, also has an obligation to neither harm nor exploit the patients/subjects”. Based on the previous medical experimentations on incarcerated human subjects, at least one of these regulations was and is violated. Even though someone is deprived the right to live, does not means that they are deprived from their right to choose what happens to their body. At this point the government is not only taking one’s life away, but also restricting their personal autonomy to do anything to their body. By now, this is going beyond what is known to be illegal. Normally patients are expected to be…
- 1104 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
State government of Victoria, 2013) Mental Health Laws and involuntary patients. Retrieved on the 23/03/13 from…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Moreover, it is important to state that these conclusions do not justify that these human rights violations only occur to those in prison. In fact, not only are the rights relating to appropriate health care violated but we can also assume that the right to security is also violated. As stated in the United Nations Principles for Older Persons (1991), older individuals inherently have the right to access to health…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
unfortunately retrogressive decision in English administrative law, insofar as it suggested that there are degrees of unreasonableness and that only a very extreme degree can bring an administrative decision within the legitimate scope of judicial invalidation. The depth of judicial review and the deference due to administrative discretion vary with the subject matter. It may well be, however, that the law can never be satisfied in any administrative field merely by a finding that the decision under review is not capricious or absurd.’ ( (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2001] UKHL 26, [32], Lord Cooke of Thorndon).…
- 2049 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays