Preview

1977 Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1977 Dbq
The Alien and Sedition Acts were a series of four bills passed in June and July of 1798 that revealed the disagreements between Federalists and Democratic Republicans. The two parties debated over many things, such as foreign policy, the strength of federal government, and states’ rights. These debates defined the effort to decide our country’s future. Examples of the differences between Federalist and Democratic Republican views are the French Revolution, Kentucky & Virginia Resolutions, and the XYZ Affair. These events all resulted in conflicts of the late 1790’s. This decade was a time of international crisis and discord. The Federalists opposed the Democratic Republicans’ attachment to France. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, thought that Britain was superior and believed that the U.S. should model our government after theirs (Document D). Jefferson argued that Britain wasn’t democratic enough and we would lose our republican policies if we used their form of government (Document E). The Alien and Sedition acts obviously were in favor of Federalists and were passed by them to ensure a win in the election of 1800. The Alien and Sedition acts caused the requirement for naturalization as a citizen to be fourteen years. New immigrants were poor and would have favored the Democratic Republicans, but by taking their right to vote away, the Federalists were given an advantage. Democratic Republicans did not agree with the Acts and argued that they were unconstitutional. The Acts were an example of British influence on the Federalists because it gave government too much power (Documents P & Q). The XYZ Affair infuriated the country. The French were perceived by Americans as murderers with a corrupt government (Document M). Democratic Republicans lost a large amount of support because of their French ideas. This period of unpopularity for the Democratic Republicans allowed Federalists to pass the Alien and Sedition Acts. The French Revolution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1982 DBQ

    • 479 Words
    • 1 Page

    eventually became reason for slaves to fight for freedom. John Brown, though his raid on…

    • 479 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President George Washington’s own cabinet split along party lines. Secretary of State Tomas Jefferson and his Republican Party were passionately in favor of France, while Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and many other Federalists felt Britain was a bulwark of civilization against the rising tide of revolutionary anarchy. Nominally a Federalist, Washing…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying documents. You will have 60 minutes to read and analyze the documents and answer the question.…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton's Vision

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jefferson’s views differed substantially from Hamilton’s. As Hamilton went on his quest for economic development and superiority of the U.S, Jefferson always dreamed of a society ran by independent yeoman farm families. Jefferson attracted members of the south as southern society relied heavily on farming as opposed to the industrial north. Jefferson’s perspective may differ from Hamilton’s but that doesn’t mean Jefferson’s perspective was wrong. During the turmoil in Europe with the French Revolution, and the First French Republic’s war against the British-led coalition of monarchies, European farming was heavily disrupted and called for the importation of American crops. In addition, with the invention of the cotton gin, American cotton production skyrocketed as production efficiency increased substantially. This division between Hamiltonian Federalists and Jefferson’s Democratic Republican will lay the foundation of a 2 party dominant political system in the U.S for generations to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it has created. This was shown by interpretations of the constitution and other documents when the constitution was assorted together.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1996 Dbq

    • 696 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the timespan of 1860, the beginning of the Civil War, to 1877, the end of Reconstruction, many social and constitutional developments took place. Such developments included secession of the south, disputes over civil liberties such as voting, the ending of slavery, and the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments. These expansions were very revolutionary to an extent but due to the intrusion of white supremacist groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, couldn’t fully prosper.…

    • 696 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1789 in effect many issues revealed. The Alien and Sedition Act seemed to oppose to the Constitution. But with the Federalist seeming to be the “top dogs” they showed to it be reasonable. Some of the many controversies of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1789 resulted in producing Federalist to revolt against Democratic- Republicans and increase powers as well as it allowed one political party to believe they were in more control by eliminating the other.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Alien and Sedition Acts were pushed by a federalist administration that was keen on minimizing immigrant support for the republican side. The reason informing the law was by itself a major debate issue. Other issues included their constitutionality, whether they were right or wrong, as well as whether limitation of speech could ever be justified. While the federalist administration argued that the legislations were best for the nation, the democratic republican opposition thought that everything was unfair and…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1798 the United States was involved in an undeclared war with France. “The United States again stood on the brink of war with a major European power, only this time instead of Great Britain the hostile nation was France.”(Hay 141) Later on the Federalist Party passed a series of four laws which were called the Alien and Sedition Acts and the Federalists saw foreigners as a deep threat to American security. There were a series of four acts that were adopted to alienate aliens. The first of these acts was the Naturalization Act which was passed by Congress on June 18. This act required that aliens be residents for 14 years instead of 5 years before they become eligible for United States citizenship. The second major act was the Alien Act which authorized the President to deport aliens who were dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States during peacetime. Furthermore the third act was the Alien Enemies Act which allowed wartime arrest, imprisonment and deportation of any alien from an enemy power. The last of these acts was the Sedition Act which consisted of, if there was any treasonable activity, including publication of any false or scandalous writing was wrong and punishable by fine or imprisonment. These acts helped to assist the government's sense of security for the United States. Although the government accepted the acts, people like James Madison were against for what the acts stood for. To protest the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions were written to show that the acts were unconstitutional in the since that any acts of Congress that were not authorized by the Constitution and violated on the reserved powers of the states. Stating that the federal government can’t create new powers for itself and it must be approved by the states of the people.…

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American colonists experienced much turbulence in their journey to fight for the ultimate cause that shaped our country. In 1774, the Intolerable Acts were passed which would act as a prelude to the American Revolution. The Coercive Acts also known as Intolerable Acts were an unfair set of different acts placed upon the colonists resulting in popularization of the idea concerning self-government and unalienable rights held by each human. The Intolerable Acts, were several different acts that punished the colonists after The Boston Tea Party incident. After the acts were passed the colonists responded by uniting, “raising money, sending supplies, and [continuing to boycott], as well as burning British tea,” (Shi & Tindall 132).…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays