Preview

14th Amendment Pros And Cons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
14th Amendment Pros And Cons
Avigdor Schultz
Contemporary issues in Law
Professor. Kurland
12/15/15
PRO GAY RIGHTS FINAL The 14th amendment, passed by Congress on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868, under the presidency of Andrew Johnson. The fourteenth Amendment is one of the reconstruction Amendments, it addresses citizenship rights, and the equal protection of the laws. Gay rights and same sex marriage is protected by the Due Process Clause, and the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
…show more content…
You can't deny somebody the right to get married without touching discrimination. " On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Sarah Zabel ruled Florida's gay marriage ban unconstitutional and stated that the ban serves only to hurt, to discriminate, to deprive same-sex couples and their families of equal dignity, to label and treat them as second-class citizens, and to deem them unworthy of participation in one of the fundamental institutions of our society."(ProCon.org) Opposing gay marriage is just flat out wrong, you can't just treat some citizen of the country one way and favor the others, that is 100% discrimination, and unconstitutional. Some people might argue and say that it's strictly a religious matter, however, that's not true, marriage is also a secular matter. Secondly telling gay people they can't get married isn't a religious freedom its abuse. Because if you were to base your argument off of the fact that gay people can't get married because of your religion, that's flat our crazy, one because not everyone in this country, or the world is of the same religion, and secondly, I can just go an make a religion were gay people are allowed to get married, and that ok because that what we believe in. Other people maybe argue that it says in the bible that gays getting married is an abomination, however, this country was founded on the fact that there is separation of church and state, which make that argument invalid as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Initial thought of the 13th amendment is freedom, a freedom that was given to those forced into slavery. So if it was written to bring good to those affected; why is it that, it can be used to do more harm than good. Upon being written, the drafters set themselves up with an extremely credulous loophole, a clause that can go on simply missed by its definition. That same very clause which can be used as a method to legally make business out of slavery and to just as legally make enslavement a punishment for those who are incarcerated. Which is exactly what the Netflix Documentary, 13th, is all about, more specifically on how the American system of incarceration affects people of color. The film follows the chronological term of events in America’s…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding this, it should be understood that it should not matter what individuals believe, who they donate to or what or who they support. However, it appears more and more often that this idea of 14th amendment is being used to limit the 1st amendment. In another recent Pew Research study, they found that 40% of millennials would be in favor of limiting what people can and cannot say. Especially in regards to or about minority groups. This was compared to other groups such as Gen X and Baby Boomers where the percentage was found to at 27% and 24% . This stark compression shows what some are willing to give up, in order to appease others and to prevent the sins of the past.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, I wanted to start by stating that not only was your post compelling, but it was also well researched. Secondly, I agree with you that the idea of amending the 14th amendment, to exclude children born in the United States (U.S.), by undocumented immigrants would be absolutely horrific. In addition, I also agree with your statement that children born in the United States, whose parents are illegal immigrants should not be punished just because their parents are not U.S. citizens. It is tragic that so many people are blinded by the stereotypes of illegal immigrants that some U.S. citation will speak ill of infants born by undocumented immigrants. A survey was taken in 2011 which showed only 57% of American citizens wanted to keep the…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 14th Amendment states that people who are born in the U.S. are automatically citizens. Because of this, immagrants from all over are coming over to the U.S. and are having children in order for them to stay in the U.S. I agree with this amendment, however others may disagree. Others may believe that in order for your child to become a citizen, the parents themselves must be citizens.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It includes the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, among others. It was proposed on June 13, 1866, and was ratified on July 9, 1868. It is perhaps the most significant structural change to the Constitution since the passage of the United States Bill of Rights. (contributors, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution happened after the War Reconstruction .It was meant to secure the rights of former slaves. It was proposed on June 13, 1866. It was made official on July 9, 1868. The amendment tells a broad definition of citizenship. For example the overruling of Dred Scott v. Sandford which had excluded slaves from possessing Constitutional rights. The amendment requires states to provide equal protection under law to all persons within their jurisdictions and was used in the 20th century to get rid of racial segregation in the…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The incorporation of the Bill of Rights is the procedure by which the United States courts have implemented pieces of the United States Bill of Rights to the states, by the due process clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. During the case of Barron v. Baltimore, the U.S. Supreme Court expressed that the Bill of Rights implemented to the government, but not to the states. Some claimed that the creator of the 14th Amendment intention had been to reverse this particular precedent. This Amendment is one of the reconstruction Amendment, and was adopted in 1868. The fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause forbids local and state governments from denying persons of liberty, life, or property without particular steps that guaranteed fairness.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If a person was born in the United States of America, then that person is citizen…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.... ”(Source 5) This means, any person born in the United States is considered a citizen of America and whichever state they live in. Any citizen will have the rights of life, liberty, and property and nobody can deprive them of it. Even African Americans can have it without getting everything taken away from them as long as they are…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those are marriages are strictly between a man and a woman and marriage is a privilege, not a right. In bible it is often quotes that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. So in the case of Baker v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that “the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within an family is as old as the book of Genesis” (Gay Marriage - ProCon.org). So two couple of the same sex getting married is contradictory to that belief. Many Christian believers believe that it is morally wrong to allow same-sex marriage. These can be attributed to religious texts. Oppose group of marriage equality believe that marriage is a privilege and not a right. The classes that are protect under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 include “(1) a history of longstanding, widespread discrimination, (2) economic disadvantage, and (3) immutable characteristics… ‘Sexual Orientation’ does not meet any of the three objective criteria shared by the historically protected civil rights categories” (Gay Mariage – ProCon.org). Same-sex marriage contradicts nature. Two people of the same sex will never be able to marry because it is biologically…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay marriage and religion go hand and hand with each other. Religion is one of the main reasons that people are having a debate over gay marriage. Even with laws being passed, some churches still will not allow same-sex couples to be marry into their religion. Churches that are against gay marriage can have a choice to deny the people their right to be marry, but by doing so they will get punish with tax exempts and that their choice. Religions or churches should not interfere with the rights people to have when they get married. In the future, maybe all religions will be able to accept gay…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 14th Amendment to the Constitution states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States” are granted citizenship, which included slaves. Additionally, the 14th Amendment declares that states cannot deny any person “life, liberty or property, without due process of law” and that a state could not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” This amendment basically outlined who is a citizen of the United States and safeguarded particular rights for the people, making it an extremely important amendment.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legalization of gays

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even in the states where gay marriage is legal, gay couples don't always get the same benefits as other married couples. Why are they any different than anyone else? Denying them of marriage is the same kind of discrimination as being racist or sexist. It's completely wrong.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Rights Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book Gay marriage by Kate Burns, it states "Who owns marriage? In other words, who defines marriage? Who allows marriage, and who enforces it?" (22) It's wrong to tell two people who love each other that they cannot marry; it's nobody's business who you fall in love with. Just like it is no one's business to tell same sex couples they should not be able wed. Same sex couples just want the benefits of being married like everyone else and there is no proof saying that it is wrong for them to have those benefits. By not allowing them to marry all that America is doing is depriving same sex couples of their rights to care for each other and provide for each other. A common married couple gets benefits on health, gets to make decisions that are best for their spouse in extreme cases, and gets to inherit their spouse's belongings in death. Making same sex marriage illegal also makes the people who are attracted to the same sex feel inferior.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    same sex

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As a gay man, I found myself disappointed with this definition—that anyone with any sort of moral reservations about gay marriage is by definition anti-gay. If Raushenbush is right, then that means my parents are anti-gay, many of my religious friends (of all faiths) are anti-gay, the Pope is anti-gay, and—yes, we’ll go here—first-century, Jewish theologian Jesus is anti-gay. That’s despite the fact that while some religious people don’t support gay marriage in a sacramental sense, many of them are in favor of same-sex civil unions and full rights for the parties involved. To be sure, most gay people, myself included, won’t be satisfied until our loving, monogamous relationships are graced with the word “marriage.” But it’s important to recall that many religious individuals do support strong civil rights for the gay members of their communities.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays