Preview

12 Angry Men Quotes Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men Quotes Analysis
TWELVE ANGRY MEN – QUOTES
P1. ‘It now becomes your duty to separate the facts from the fancy’. (Judge)
‘I urge you to deliberate honestly and thoughtfully’. (Judge)
‘If, however, there is no reasonable doubt –then you must, in good conscience, find the accused guilty’. (Judge)
‘Your verdict must be unanimous’. (Judge)
P3. ‘..Even when the case is as obvious as this one. I mean, did you ever hear so much talk about nothing?’ (Juror 3)
‘Everybody deserves a fair trial. Sometimes I think we’d be better off if we took these tough kids and slapped ‘em down before they make any trouble.’ (Juror 3)
P4. ‘Goddam waste of time’. (Juror 7)
P7. ‘Boy-oh-boy! There’s always one.’ (Juror 10)
‘..We’re talking about someone’s life here. I mean, we can’t decide in five minutes. Suppose we’re wrong ?’ (Juror 8)
…show more content…
‘He’s had a pretty terrible sixteen years. I think maybe we owe him a few words. That’s all.’ (Juror 10)
P9. ‘I mean nobody proved otherwise’. (Juror 2)
‘Nobody has to prove otherwise. The burden of proof is on the prosecution.’ (Juror 8)
P10. ‘She’s one of ‘Them’ too, isn’t she? ‘ (Juror 8 )
‘What’s he so wise about.’ (Juror 10)
P12. ‘Slums are breeding grounds for criminals’. (Juror 4) ‘The kids that crawl outta those places are real trash. I don’t want any part of them.’ (Juror 10)
‘I’ve lived in slums all my life. I nurse that trash in Harlem Hospital six nights a week.’ (Juror 5)
‘There is something personal.’ (Juror 5)
‘This sensitivity I understand.’ (Juror

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In a crowded jury room, opinions collide as discussions about the innocence of a young boy are decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror 10. These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie 12 Angry Men depicts a typical scene today: twelve jury members meeting to discuss a case presented to them and determine guilt or innocence of a young man accused of killing his own father. Usually the jury room is a place for discussion and debate, but the evidence has swayed all but one of the jurors into voting guilty. The group in the movie is a jury of 12 men with various backgrounds and age groups. They were placed in a deliberation room where the entire move took place.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His words, ’there are facts for you’, ‘you can’t refute facts’ and his listing of reasons why he thinks the boy is guilty are persuasive to other jurors and the audience as well. Nevertheless, as the play goes on, the 3rd juror starts to be blindfolded by his aggressive feelings about his own son, making his opinion extremely bias and he even uses threatening language, ‘ let go of me, god damn it! I’ll kill him!’ ‘I’m telling you now!’ to force others agree with him. His shouting towards 8th juror, ‘The nerve! The absolute nerve!’ and also his bad behavior make others feel antipathetic towards…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter 11 of Unfair “What We Must Overcome” our author tackles on three serious challenges we face in realizing science-based reforms. First, he addresses the approach our justice system has towards juror screenings and exactly how we are getting it wrong. Benforado suggest that these juror screening are intended to eliminate those people who cannot be fair if selected to be a jury in a criminal case. While we purpose to address this bias, our author suggest that we are instead,” reinforcing a false narrative oh what bias is, where it comes from and how it can be remedied. “(P.g. 240) Consequently, Benforado offers us an experience of his own with the juror selection process, which he and other jurors filled out a questionnaire. Moreover, if you indicated that you are more likely to the believe the testimony of a police officer, over the testimony of a normal person all you received was speech on why it was wrong. The judge would explain to you that” your job as a juror required you to treat every witness the same regardless of his or her position, race, gender or the like. (P.g.240) After…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juror 11 can relate to the boy as he lived the same life in terms of the environment in which he was raised. Reminds others of their responsibilities and that…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is inevitable that the jurors own personal experiences affect their opinion on the innocence of the defendant. It is these personal experiences, which threaten the defendants right to ‘a fair trial’ at the danger of a juror’s personal bias ‘obscur[ing] the truth.’ Juror 3 is depicted as the juror with the most prejudice throughout the play, consistent with the vote of ‘guilty’ as he relates the defendant to his own son who he describes as a ‘rotten kid.’ This illustrates the danger that personal bias has on the justice system, as the defendant is being adjudicated by juror 3 on his age and gender rather than the merits of the case. Prejudice is also displayed by juror 10 who see’s the accused as ‘trash’ due to his ‘slums’ background, this…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    each juror has there own deficiencies or less than ideal qualities, these emerge through their interactions with eachother or their attitudes towards their trial. juror 10 is predjudice regularly using stereotypes to condemn the defendsant without actually considering if what he is saying is true. such as ‘a very big drinker’ or a born liar’ the third juror is guilty of stereotyping the defendant based on age, and he defends his opinions and stereotypes violently in the jury room, such as his near attack on 8th juror at the end of the first act. the play does not let a single character escape unflawed. even 8th juror,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wrightsman, L. E., Kassin, S.M, Willis, C.E (Ed.). (1987). In the jury box: Controversies in…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, a 16-year-old boy, who was abused by his father for about 13 years, was suspected of the murder of his own father. However, the jurors pointed out that the testimonies are shaky- and possibly they are just lying- and the physical evidences does not prove that the boy stabbed his father. The jurors were all convinced that there is no evidence sufficient to prove that the boy is an actual murderer. Ultimately, they brought and found this boy ‘not…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Latimer Mock Trial

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The rules of criminal procedure are highly significant to the defendants because they are designed to guarantee the constitutional rights and freedoms to those individuals charged with an offence. They serve to truly protect the victims, and ensure the guilty are brought to justice. In criminal trials, individuals in the jury wielded real power in the trial since they settle the fate of their fellow citizens by determining the defense is whether they are guilty of some of the most horrendous crimes. Being a member of the jury, my predominant responsibility in the mock trial was listening to the evidence presented by the Crown and the defense carefully. The jury was expected to examine all the evidence deliberately and make judgement without any bias. In order to make the discussion about the trial confidential, the jury were adjourned to the outside of the room to make a decision. An unanimous was made by the jury in order for a verdict to be reached. In this mock trial, the jury decided that Latimer shall be given a sentence of seven years. This decision made by the jury reflects the values and standards of the general public that Latimer do not deserve a more severe sentence. By bringing ordinary citizens into the court and placing them at the very heart of the decision-making process, trial by jury has become the most democratic part of the legal system. Furthermore, I experienced that the court uses witness testimony in an attempt to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense. During cross-examination, the Crown and the defense asked questions trying to detect falsehood of the testimony or to destroy the credibility of the opponent’s witnesses. By asking questions connected to the witnesses’ characters, the defense…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror 7 is disappointing because he selfishly wants to go to the ball game. Initially he believes that the judgement will be made rapidly and he becomes increasingly frustrated when it is evident that the vote won’t be unanimous. The disappointing aspect is that he has a voice but lacks any reasoning, dismissive of logic in preference to a speedy outcome. Some may suggest that he is simple, but he is so caught up in his own world that he refuses to see or acknowledge the emotional needs of others. He may well offer chewing gum to those around, but the reality is he has no real concern for the needs of others. He is blinded by the immediate, unable to see beyond his own needs. It is disappointing that he is depicted as the man on the street, the knock about bloke off to the ball game who is largely inoffensive. Yet his apathy is offensive as it presents a narrow world where people do not care for others.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror 10 is one of the most racist and prejudice of the all the jurors a quote to show this is “Now you’re not going to tell us that we’re supposed to believe that kid, knowing what he is. Listen, I’ve lived among ‘em all my life. You can’t believe a word they say. I mean, they’re born liars.” When he says this he means/believes that people are born in slums are born to live lives of crime and disseat, even thou juror 5 was born and lived in a slum all his life he is a perfectly respectably man. This proves that juror 10 was wrong and people born in slums aren’t born to lie and commit crime. There for prejudice did obscure the truth for juror 10.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    jurors (Sommers, 2007). As a result, the concerns and questions pertaining to the internal validity…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics