Preview

12 Angry Men Prejudice Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
627 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men Prejudice Analysis
1. Out of the 12 jurors, juror number 10,4, and 3 displayed some form of prejudice. Juror number 10 was the man that displayed his prejudice openly stating that “they” shouldn’t be trusted. He already had a view of the Turks from the time he "lived among them”. Another Juror that displayed prejudice is juror number 4. Juror number 4 was the stock broker. His prejudice was displayed when the group briefly talked about the slums and the people that come out of them. During this discussion he shows his feelings toward the kids in the slum in the statement “We're not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals... The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society. A third juror that displayed his prejudice is juror number 3. Juror number 3 is the man that sees the cases as simple, the accused is guilty. He is prejudice more or less towards the kids that are growing up in this society. Before telling his story about his son he says “You’re right. It's the kids. The way they are—you know? They don't listen.”. During this he reveals how he sees kids as stubborn and delinquents.

2. …show more content…
Reverse discrimination is the favoring of a minority group that used to be discriminated against this leaves the majority group feeling that they are now left out and mistreated. No reverse discrimination is not displayed by #8 or any of the jurors. If anything, they are giving this kid the benefit of the doubt taking into account that relationship between him and his father and that information given to has holes that they see are not all
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis

    Twelve angry men is a 1957 American Film that originated from a play of Reginald Rose and has been directed to a film by Sidney Lumet. The movie is not just about the outcome of the trial of a Puerto Rican youth who has been accused of murdering his father, but also shows how the beliefs and attitudes of the twelve jurors lead to his acquittal. Aside from that, this movie also shows Leadership traits that can help every individual on developing their leadership capabilities. The story started when the twelve jurors were put together in a sweltering deliberation room somewhere in America where they have been asked for their verdicts whether to put the child on chair or not. Eleven of them unanimously voted that the youth is guilty and must be…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Jurors 3/10 Different Essay Example
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12 Angry Jurors 3/10 Different Essay Example

    On the other hand, juror 10 is a loud mouthed, racist bigot. He scolds people he doesn’t agree with and a low opinion of people living in slum areas. Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision from the moment he saw the young boy and sees no reason for him to waste any time debating on whether the defendant is guilty. His prejudice comes from the fact he used to live in the “slums” and considers people like the defendant to be “trash”. This is established when he states “well take a look at them…you can’t believe a word they say…they act different… they don’t need any big excuse to kill someone. (59) This man is very…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview
    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

    In the play, Twelve Angry Men, juror #3 is an excitable, stubborn, and prejudiced man. He seems to be of middle class background because he can afford to look down on people from slum areas. From the way he refuses to listen to any other person’s opinions, if it contradicts his own, juror #3 marks himself as an ignorant and obstinate individual. He is quick to judge and eagerly jumps at any opportunity to engage himself in an argument, such as the dispute he starts with juror #5 over a changed verdict: “We’re trying to put a guilty man in the chair where he belongs and all of a sudden somebody’s telling us fairy tales – and we’re listening.” The third juror uses ethos to no avail and comes across as an unpleasant, partial, and uneducated man.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men
    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a murder trial conducted in a courtroom. The judge gave the jury its final instruction telling them that a guilty verdict will result in a death sentence for the defendant, an 18-year-old boy who was accused of murdering his father using a knife! One juror had a personal connection with the case. He has not seen his son for more than two years. He claims that the young boy is guilty and that all young kids are criminals. The juror has bias towards the trial because he see his son in the young boy. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven jurors voted for conviction. Another juror states that he has doubts about the case and hopes to give the boy a favorable decision. The young boy had a hard life living in the slum. A third juror claims that each of the…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Text Essay
    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Text Essay

    The generalisations established by certain Jurors, makes them oblivious to the facts before them. Characters rely on generalised stereotypes to support their prejudices against those of a lower-socio economic status. The 10th Juror says to other Jurors ‘the kids who crawl outta those places are real trash’ and the 4th Juror states ‘Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.’ Neither the 10th nor the 4th Jurors makes reference to specific details of the defendant’s situation, but…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Essay

    The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the movie unfolds, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities and how they deal with argumentation within groups and critical thinking. This allows Mr. Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men and Pessimistic Views
    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men and Pessimistic Views

    Pessimism? Depending on the definition that you give to this your answer might be different ... Pessimism infers negativity of some degree. If there is "pessimism" in Rose's message (and I think there is not!), it could be seen in the uncertainty that his description of the jury room process involves - it is not perfect and open to prejudiced manipulation, poor governance and apathy, but concurrently it is also open to a positive dissent that evokes the values that any civilized society governed by democratic processes and laws strives to achieve - a balance between individual and societal justice that allows for difference and for doubt, where the pragmatist might desire expedience and a retributive justice (revenge) as against a restorative justice dependent on a burden of proof provided by the prosecution and the presumption of innocence of the accused.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Conformity
    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Conformity

    The behaviour of individuals in any large dynamic group naturally exhibits various signs of either conscious or subconscious conformity. The psychological principle of conformity which related to social influence basically refers to an exertion on the will of the affected individual to act in a manner that is not in accordance with one¡¦s actual beliefs. Many different studies of conformity as a result of social influence have been conducted which reveal that almost all conformist responses to social influence can be narrowed down to three distinctive types: compliance, identification and internalization. This paper will use 12 Angry Men as a case study on the dynamics of social influence, especially the influence of individual nonconformist,…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 angry men
    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 angry men

    I believe in the beginning the 2 main jurors who were basing their decisions on prejudice were mainly Jurors #3 and #10. Juror #3 more based on prejudices of young men, particularly because he had such a horrendous relationship with his own son, I feel like this case really hit him close to home and really affected him in a personal way. I believe he let his feelings got in the way of his logical thinking and was practically projecting the anger he had towards his son towards the young men on trial, who had been accused of a horrible crime against his father. Juror #10 was more prejudice of the young suspects race, making statements like; “You know how they are,” and “They’re all the same, all born liars”.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men

    Bias and prejudice affect most decision making on some level. For instance, Juror 10 reveals his prejudice in his monologue on pages 63-65. The following quote makes it clear that Juror 10’s prejudice affects his decision, “They [foreigners] think different. They act different… they don’t need any big excuse to kill someone… They’re violent.” Juror 10’s bias led him to believe that the boy on trial was, by nature, violent. This would, without doubt, influence him to deliver a vote of guilty despite any evidence that could potentially exonerate the boy. There are several more instances of bias in the play such as Juror 4’s preconceived notions about people with slum backgrounds. “Slums are breeding grounds for criminals… Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.” This preconception influences Juror 4’s decision-making process. These examples illustrate major flaws that humans may bring to the jury system.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper
    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Research Paper

    His emotional prejudice gets in the way of his critically thinking through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son. He is grouping all teens together because of his altercation with his son, and Juror 3 is just punishing the young man on trial because he cannot come to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all alone on the vote count; he “looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them despise him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist down on the table” … (thundering) All right” (30).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Prejudice Essay
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Prejudice Essay

    Juror 10’s little rampage in pages 51 to 53 of the book really show his thought of people who live in a slum neighbourhood, he talks like they’re from a completely different planet to us, for example he tries to tell to the rest of the court room with a stern voice “They are different. They think different. They act different”. Juror 10 also thinks that people who live in the slums have a different way of life and a different way of resolving problems “They don’t need any big excuse to kill someone.” Juror 10’s experiences…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics