Although I feel bombing Japan was necessary, there are a few reasons as to why the bomb shouldn't have been used as well. In the midst of the bombing, a lot of innocent people were killed! Another reason is that Japan was already exhausted and reportedly on the verge of surrendering, it was just the military government with a “fight to the death attitude”, not the general population. They created the kamikaze because they ran out of weapons, this was a desperate act. The last reason I can think of would be that the bombing alarmed the Soviet Union and let to an eventual nuclear arms race.
If it isn't obvious already, I think bombing Japan was what had to be done. Even though it potentially killed innocent people, it saved just as many lives in the US, if not more! Many Japanese soldiers lives were saved, mainly because of the scheduled invasion. The experience of Iwo Jima and Okinawa proved their willingness to fight to the last man. The war ended much quicker. An invasion of the Japanese home islands was scheduled to begin no earlier than 1946 and would've lasted at least the better part of a year. At the end of the day it was drop the bomb and end the war, or be prepared to drag on a fight almost too great to fight.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In President Harry Truman speech to inform his citizens on how he was going to end WWII, he said the U.S. “shall destroy their docks, their factories, and their communications. Let there be no mistake; we shall completely destroy Japan’s power to make war” (Harry Truman). The U.S. made it very clear that their main goal was to force Japan to surrender and that they would stop at nothing to make that happen. Evidently, even using the world’s first nuclear weapons in war did not limit the United States. After the destruction and devastation the bombs had caused, Japanese officials had no other choice but to unconditionally surrender, and announce an end to the war. Though there is still a debate today about whether the bomb was necessary to end…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
“We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…
- 717 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…
- 186 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…
- 119 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…
- 639 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…
- 125 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…
- 141 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The bomb should have been used on Japan because they would not surrender even after the Soviet Union declared war on them. They also attacked Pearl Harbor killing 2,335 U.S. servicemen were killed and wounding 1,143. Sixty-eight civilians were also killed and 35 were wounded. During war just fighting with Japan 106, 207 American Heroes were lost; we could not let their deaths be in vein.…
- 275 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…
- 635 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
World War 2, is thought to a fight for humanity. Most people agree that if Hitler wins, that the world is going downhill from there. This is why the bombing has been justified. In my opinion, I believe that using nuclear weapons against Japan is necessary to end the war. If we do not drop the bomb, and we invade Japan instead, millions of soldiers will lose their lives. If we care about our country and our soldiers, we would choose to drop this…
- 376 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The atomic bomb was necessary in order to assure the war would end as soon as possible. On August 6th the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, on august 9th a second one was dropped on Nagasaki, and on August 10th Japan declared its intention to surrender. This is clear proof that atomic bomb was an effective way to end the war. Even if it did kill many people it might actually have killed less people then if we had kept the war going for much longer.…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Japans army was too strong for the United States to invade. That is why they chose to drop the bombs. The american soldiers were very tired from four years of fighting the war. Japan had two million soldiers waiting for an invasion to happen. There is no way the war would have ended without the bombings.…
- 881 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
"The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..." Admiral William D. Leahy (Alperovitz,The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, date of publication unknown) There have been many issues involved with the use of the atomic bomb because of the high cost of lives, and that it was considered to be immoral and unethical. However it has also been considered necessary for the war to have ended, avoiding further casualties on both sides.…
- 1787 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Personally I believe that we should not have dropped the atomic Bomb on Japan. The views for this issue is very questionable. Some say it was justified, because Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. However, others would say that it was inhumane. I am part of these people. if I was the president during this time, I would not have release the bomb, unless it was absolutely necessary to bring the end to World War II.…
- 250 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays